192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Tue 18 Sep, 2018 11:38 am
camlok
 
  -1  
Tue 18 Sep, 2018 11:46 am
@coldjoint,
Wow, talk about totally unhinged conspiracy theorists, coldjoint. You Trump guys take the cake!

This is precisely how your war criminal governments have been able to dupe so many of you sheeple into supporting their perpetual lies and then illegal invasions of sovereign nations.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  5  
Tue 18 Sep, 2018 11:47 am
Quote:
China has hit back at President Donald Trump by imposing new trade tariffs on $60bn of American goods.

It comes after the US slapped duties on $200bn of Chinese imports on Monday, escalating its trade war with Beijing.

China will target American goods such as liquefied natural gas, which are produced in states loyal to the US president.

However, in a tweet Mr Trump warned Beijing against seeking to influence the upcoming US midterm elections.

"There will be great and fast economic retaliation against China if our farmers, ranchers and/or industrial workers are targeted!" he said.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-45555749
camlok
 
  0  
Tue 18 Sep, 2018 11:50 am
@izzythepush,
Quote:
"There will be great and fast economic retaliation against China if our farmers, ranchers ... are targeted!" he said.


You sure don't want some of the most heavily subsidized folks in the world to be targeted. Nosireebob!

Isn't the USA just the most hypocritical bunch of folks?
0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Tue 18 Sep, 2018 01:15 pm
Quote:
NBC does not want the truth about Trump to come out

Of course they don't.
Quote:
Now then, why is the political press so angry that the president of the United States is releasing information to the public pertinent to an investigation that the political press has obsessed with for nearly two years?


Any answers?
https://donsurber.blogspot.com/2018/09/nbc-does-not-want-truth-about-trump-to.html?spref=tw
0 Replies
 
Blickers
 
  3  
Tue 18 Sep, 2018 01:18 pm
@coldjoint,
Posting a news magazine article that says Trump's lawyer pleads guilty in court to violating campaign finance laws at Trump's direction is evidence that it what occurred. You are determined to maintain it is still not proven, so I'll just post it again so the readers can make their judgment.

What Michael Cohen’s Guilty Plea Means for Trump
The president’s former fixer on Tuesday said he broke campaign laws at Trump’s behest, paying off two women who alleged extramarital affairs.

David A. GrahamaaaaAug 21, 2018

https://i.imgur.com/eImKUNi.jpg
Michael Cohen leaves his apartment building in New York on Tuesday.Richard Drew / AP

In a sudden development Tuesday, Michael Cohen, Donald Trump’s longtime attorney and fixer, pleaded guilty to bank fraud and tax fraud and said he broke campaign-finance laws at the president’s behest, with the goal of quieting allegations of sexual affairs.

The plea on eight felony counts, entered Tuesday afternoon in federal court in Manhattan, is the culmination of an investigation by the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York that became public in April, when the FBI raided Cohen’s office, home, and a hotel room where he was staying. In reality, the story runs back even further, to payments that Cohen arranged in 2016 to Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal, the two women who alleged affairs with Trump. Cohen has not agreed to cooperate with prosecutors, but reportedly decided to enter a plea to save himself public exposure and the cost of defending himself.

If not for Cohen’s connection to Trump, Tuesday’s plea would barely crack the news consciousness—just another small-time white-collar criminal. But because Cohen was close to the president and worked at the Trump Organization from 2006 until after the election, the case has been closely watched as a possible augur of Trump’s various legal troubles. The most important takeaway Tuesday is that the president’s own former personal attorney pleaded guilty to breaking campaign-finance laws at his alleged direction.

Source

Of course, the upshot of all this is that the news of Trump's lawyer pleading guilty to violating campaign finance laws at Trump's direction gets posted more often in this thread. Just in case the readers might have skipped over it the first few times. Exactly how that helps your side, I don't know.
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Tue 18 Sep, 2018 01:54 pm
@Blickers,
Quote:
. You are determined to maintain it is still not proven,

It is not. Trump has not been to a court to defend himself. It is called due process. Next.
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Tue 18 Sep, 2018 02:04 pm
Quote:
Grassley says Kavanaugh accuser IS NOT responding to their requests for next week’s hearing

Think someone is holding her down? Where is she?
https://therightscoop.com/grassley-says-kavanaugh-accuser-is-not-responding-to-their-requests-for-next-weeks-hearing/
Quote:
ON THE RUN: Kavanaugh’s Accuser Goes Underground, Blows Off Senate Invite to Testify

Quote:
. “We have reached out to her in the last 36 hours, three or four times by email and we have not heard from them. It kind of raises the question do they want to come to the public hearing or not? The reason we’re having the public hearing is obviously, well number one, accusations like this deserve consideration and looking into and that’s what the purpose of the hearing is. We wouldn’t be having the hearing if Dr. Ford told the Washington Post and other people publicly she wanted to testify.”

https://truepundit.com/on-the-run-kavanaughs-accuser-blows-off-senate-invite-to-testify/
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Tue 18 Sep, 2018 02:15 pm
Quote:
Trump declassification order commences total war with the deep state

Rats running of a sinking ship comes to mind. Let's see who is the first to go under the bus that was intended to run Trump down. Laughing
Quote:
Democrats and their media allies go full anti-transparency

Democratic leaders and their allies in the legacy media are pulling out all the stops to convince the public that the president should not be allowed to use his declassification authority. Immediately following the president’s statement, they moved in lockstep, arguing that declassifying information and making it available to the public somehow interferes in active investigations.

https://www.conservativereview.com/news/trump-declassification-order-commences-total-war-with-the-deep-state/
Below viewing threshold (view)
Blickers
 
  4  
Tue 18 Sep, 2018 02:37 pm
@coldjoint,
Quote coldjoint:
Quote:
It is not. Trump has not been to a court to defend himself. It is called due process. Next.

See, this is the strategy that Trump supporters on social media have been using all along. First you said there is no proof that Trump committed a crime, so let's just drop it. Then you said there is no proof that Trump committed a crime so let's not have a Special Counsel investigating.

Now you say there is no proof unless it's been presented in a court of law and resulted in a conviction. So I guess that means that no public figure you like should get investigated until after they've been to court for it and convicted. Which means that no public figure that you like will ever get investigated in th first place. And so on.
camlok
 
  -3  
Tue 18 Sep, 2018 03:03 pm
@Blickers,
Quote:
See, this is the strategy that Trump supporters on social media have been using all along. First you said there is no proof that Trump committed a crime, so let's just drop it. Then you said there is no proof that Trump committed a crime so let's not have a Special Counsel investigating.

Now you say there is no proof unless it's been presented in a court of law and resulted in a conviction. So I guess that means that no public figure you like should get investigated until after they've been to court for it and convicted. Which means that no public figure that you like will ever get investigated in th first place. And so on.


All this reveals your stunning hypocrisy when one considers what has been revealed just two posts before, Blickers. You are willing to speculate over the smallest, most unimportant of things, all the while ignoring the blockbuster news above.

I guess that you simply do not understand the importance of this or the implications of this.

I can understand coldjoint ignoring it but "liberals" are supposed to be better than this.
camlok
 
  -2  
Tue 18 Sep, 2018 03:43 pm
@camlok,
Quote:
All this reveals your stunning hypocrisy when one considers what has been revealed just two posts before, Blickers.


Hmmmmmm, where oh where did my post of the most relevant contemporary event of the last 17 years get to, on the Univ of Alaska, Fairbanks WTC7 report?

Does A2K have censors?
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Tue 18 Sep, 2018 03:44 pm
@Blickers,
Quote:
So I guess that means that no public figure you like should get investigated until after they've been to court for it and convicted.

I did not say that, and I am still waiting for you to cite the law Trump broke. Your deflections and excuses are as worthless as your posts.
0 Replies
 
Blickers
 
  3  
Tue 18 Sep, 2018 03:51 pm
@coldjoint,
From the Conservative Review:
Quote:

On Monday evening, President Trump ordered the “immediate declassification” of materials related to the Russia investigation and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) applications used to spy [sic] on former campaign aide Carter Page.


Oddly, the Conservative Review fails to mention that for a time Carter Page's best buddies just happened to be members of a Kremlin spy ring before they all got busted. One of them, Evgeny Buryakov, got sentenced to jail for 30 months and got deported back to Russia after he was released. The other two, Victor Podobnyy and Igor Sporyshev, had diplomatic immunity and left for Russia.

And Trump supporters were angry that someone was checking out Carter Page after that happened???
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Tue 18 Sep, 2018 03:54 pm
@Blickers,
Quote:
And Trump supporters were angry that someone was checking out Carter Page after that happened???

Why hasn't Page been charged then? I do not expect you to answer this question either. It was an excuse to spy on Trump and the documents will prove that.
Blickers
 
  4  
Tue 18 Sep, 2018 04:09 pm
@coldjoint,
Why is it mandatory that a guy who was best buddies with a Kremlin spy ring that was later exposed and busted necessarily be charged? Maybe he didn't know they were spies, maybe he did. Either way the government still had a damned good reason to check him out.

How much more do conservatives want to do to assist Putin's spy agencies?
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.42 seconds on 04/25/2024 at 08:46:48