@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
That might explain his response re Russian meddling, but it does not explain his attacks on NATO and his lukewarm response to the invasion of Crimea and Assad's war crimes, (with Russian backing,) in Syria.
Russia and Trump go back a long way, long before he was running for office. Putin has had a long time to collect damning evidence. To be honest I wouldn't be surprised if it was Putin's idea that Trump should run for president in the first place.
Actually, I think that it does, at least to a degree. Trump feels himself(or so I think) as the undesignated leader of the NATO(probably historically justified). However, if he then takes the look of a businessman, you once again find yourself with Trump at the helm of an organization he probably sees no real use for, since in his eyes, his 'strong bonds' with Putin makes the reason NATO was established in the first place kind of moot. Couple that with his irritation at the fact the financial burdens were unfairly falling on US shoulders. I think Trump is more then ready and willing to either dissolve NATO or at least withdraw the USA from it.
But frankly, I don't buy that Putin would have something so bad on Trump that he could make him say these things in front of the camera. Or rather, that he would make Donald say these sort of things for the world to hear. Because what would he have to gain for it?
If this is true, then Putin effectively has the US president in his pocket, right? Then why make him make such inflammatory remarks on tv? If Trump goes too far, it might get him impeached, and then what would happen? Putin would lose his puppet, and the US would distrust Russia once again.
So what does Putin have to gain from Trump saying what he did?