192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
oralloy
 
  -3  
Tue 17 Apr, 2018 10:25 pm
@revelette1,
revelette1 wrote:
Rasmussen, enough said.

Excellent accurate polls.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -3  
Tue 17 Apr, 2018 10:32 pm
@glitterbag,
glitterbag wrote:
Trump has been bad mouthing Amanda Knox, he claims he was one of the reasons she was released and now he laments ever helping her. Said she isn't loyal enough.
You can google it.

I believe that Barack Obama helped her.

Italy changed the judge in her second instance trial at the last minute, swapping out some tough on crime blowhard for a maverick judge with a history of overturning wrongful convictions.

I have no proof, but I believe that this was the result of quiet diplomatic pressure from Obama.
oralloy
 
  -3  
Tue 17 Apr, 2018 10:33 pm
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:
It took Old Buck several years to meet up with his reasons for disdain, Trump has gotten his going at his inauguration.
Im amazed how stupid you folks are for NOT seeing his failings on display.

Kind of like Lincoln's supporters were too stupid to see his failings?
0 Replies
 
glitterbag
 
  2  
Tue 17 Apr, 2018 10:33 pm
@oralloy,
Trump claims it was all because of him.
oralloy
 
  -4  
Tue 17 Apr, 2018 10:34 pm
@blatham,
Quote:
Hundreds of ex-DOJ officials now urging Congress to ‘forcefully respond’ if Trump fires Mueller

The Constitution says that Trump has the right to fire Mueller if he feels like it.

Congress can pass a law if they like. The courts will just strike it down though.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -3  
Tue 17 Apr, 2018 10:36 pm
@revelette1,

Comey's whining is tedious. He deserved to be fired and he got what he deserved.

Can we please forget about him now?
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -4  
Tue 17 Apr, 2018 10:43 pm
@glitterbag,
glitterbag wrote:
Trump claims it was all because of him.

She wrote an article about the Trump kerfuffle:

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-knox-trump-loyalty-20170504-story.html

I don't have a problem with her opposing Trump. When I was young and foolish, I thought Reagan and Bush were evil.

I grew up, and now I'm embarrassed by my youthful views. Maybe her views will change too when she grows older.

Or maybe not. No big deal either way.

Trump gets into name-calling wars with pretty much everyone. I don't pay any attention to it. As long as he prevents liberals from violating the Second Amendment, I'm good.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  3  
Wed 18 Apr, 2018 05:12 am
Quote:
China has announced a hefty anti-dumping move against US sorghum imports, as a multi-billion dollar tit-for-tat trade spat between the two nations continues.

China said US importers would have to pay a temporary 178.6% deposit on the value of their imports from Wednesday.

China initiated its investigation into US sorghum imports in February.

US growers were "deeply disappointed" with the findings and are considering legal action in response.

Sorghum is a grain used primarily to feed livestock, but it is also used to create ethanol, or drinking alcohol.

The US is the world's leading producer of sorghum, and is the largest supplier of sorghum to China. China uses its sorghum imports to feed its farm animals, and in its spirits industry.

Analysts said the temporary anti-dumping deposit imposed by China, which comes ahead of a possible anti-dumping tariff on the product, was quite high and that some US shipments in the future could be cancelled as a result.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-43805549
0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  3  
Wed 18 Apr, 2018 06:09 am
Quote:
WASHINGTON — President Trump was watching television on Sunday when he saw Nikki R. Haley, his ambassador to the United Nations, announce that he would impose fresh sanctions on Russia. The president grew angry, according to an official informed about the moment. As far as he was concerned, he had decided no such thing.

It was not the first time Mr. Trump has yelled at the television over something he saw Ms. Haley saying. This time, however, the divergence has spilled into public in a remarkable display of discord that stems not just from competing views of Russia but from larger questions of political ambition, jealousy, resentment and loyalty.

The rift erupted into open conflict on Tuesday when a White House official blamed Ms. Haley’s statement about sanctions on “momentary confusion.” That prompted her to fire back, saying that she did not “get confused.” The public disagreement embarrassed Ms. Haley and reinforced questions about Mr. Trump’s foreign policy — and who speaks for his administration.

At the very least, the episode highlighted the crossed circuits over foreign policy in an administration with no secretary of state, an increasingly marginalized White House chief of staff and a national security adviser who has only been on the job for a week and has pushed out many of the senior national security officials in the White House but has yet to bring in his own team.

Since Mr. Trump fired Secretary of State Rex W. Tillerson last month, Ms. Haley has been the administration’s leading foreign policy figure. And yet she was not kept in the loop on a major decision involving perhaps America’s most powerful adversary.

According to several officials, the White House did not inform Ms. Haley that it had changed course on sanctions, leaving her to hang out alone.

“It damages her credibility going forward and once again makes everyone, friend and foe alike, wonder that when the United States says something, approves something, calls for something, opposes something, is it for real?” said Representative Gerald E. Connolly, Democrat of Virginia and a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee. “Should we wait to see what Trump does the next day?”


NYT
revelette1
 
  2  
Wed 18 Apr, 2018 06:16 am
I realize izzythepush has already posted something about the following, but I thought the piece down below brings it more closer to the ones who will be affected by the trade war of Donald Trump's.

Quote:
President Donald Trump’s trade war with China has already sparked promises of retaliatory tariffs on U.S. exports, including soybeans, that will hit such Trump-friendly Midwestern states as Iowa, Indiana, North Dakota, and Nebraska—if they take effect. In March, U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer said “there is hope” they can be forestalled.

Sorghum growers aren’t so lucky. On Tuesday, China’s Ministry of Commerce announced it would impose a 178.6 percent duty on sorghum imports from the U.S. that will take effect almost immediately. The news puts an additional Trump-friendly state (and Republican leader) squarely in the crosshairs: Kansas is the largest sorghum producer in the U.S., and its senior senator, Pat Roberts, chairs the Senate Agriculture Committee. 

“It’s extremely frustrating and very disappointing,” says Jesse McCurry, executive director of the Kansas Grain Sorghum Commission. “Half of Kansas sorghum or more was going to China, and that probably stops, at least for now.” 


Bloomberg
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  2  
Wed 18 Apr, 2018 06:34 am
Be prudent. Wax your surfboard.
Quote:
James Fallows
‏Verified account
@JamesFallows
Republican Rep. Charlie Dent, to @NewsHour’s Judy Woodruff, on why he is retiring right now:

“There’s a big wave coming. Sometimes you’ve got to get off the beach.”

0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Wed 18 Apr, 2018 07:08 am
Today's Voices From The Right
Quote:
What Jennifer Rubin saw while looking at that photo: a Republican Party that “has become the caricature the left always said it was—the party of old white men. And that has become more so in the age of Donald Trump, when he is actively courting and stoking white resentment.”

Trump’s use of identity politics, Rubin told me in an interview for the latest episode of POLITICO’s Off Message podcast, “is a dead end for the party. It’s a dead end because it’s immoral and anti-American to base an entire political movement on one racial group, and it’s a dead end because that’s not America and [what America] is becoming.”

...“Republicans have permanently eliminated themselves from credibility to govern,” Rubin said. “You can’t be willing to sacrifice core American values for the sake of a tax cut and be deemed to be worthy of trust going forward.”
Politico

Most of us would echo these sentiments. But Jennifer is still not confronting something very important and relevant to her understanding of American conservatism since Trump has brought deep tendencies to the surface.

Notice that the valid observation in the first two graphs (the party of old white men) and the equally valid complaint in the final graph (tossing everything to produce tax cuts for the wealthy) are not at all the same criticism of the modern GOP.

Keep that in mind when considering this bit of her first graph... that the GOP "has become the caricature the left always said it was". If something or someone becomes a caricature then, obviously, the "caricature" was an accurate observation of fundamental facts/tendencies in the subject observed. What she is half-saying is that the left correctly identified and described the right in America.
(Note: I have not listened to the sound file at link)

0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  3  
Wed 18 Apr, 2018 07:29 am
@revelette1,
Quote:

“It damages her credibility going forward” said Representative Gerald E. Connolly, Democrat of Virginia and a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee.”


I think Mr. Connolly has got it very wrong.

Ms. Haley has gained here, not lost.

The Democrats need to pay attention to what's happened. She's positioned herself as a Republican (non-white/non-male) who can and does stand up to #45 and the WH. She could well be the future of the party after it shakes off the damage #45 has caused to it. Underplaying/ignoring that is dangerous for the Democrats.
blatham
 
  3  
Wed 18 Apr, 2018 07:30 am
Talk about porous borders.
Quote:
The 28-year-old man who attacked a mosque in a Quebec City suburb in January 2017 spent hours in front of his computer screen reading about mass shooters and scouring the Twitter accounts of right-wing commentators, alt-right figures, conspiracy theorists and President Trump, according to evidence presented at his sentencing hearing this week.

On Monday, prosecutors revealed a 45-page document itemizing the contents of a computer belonging to the shooter, Alexandre Bissonnette, who pleaded guilty last month to six counts of first-degree murder and six counts of attempted murder in an attack that sent shock waves through Canada, a country unaccustomed to mass shootings. Six people were killed and 19 were injured in the attack.
WP
ehBeth
 
  3  
Wed 18 Apr, 2018 07:33 am
@glitterbag,
glitterbag wrote:
Aren't all the Lincoln haters dead?


not even close

I see it on some right-wing blogs and 'news' sites. They're still blaming him for black people thinking they are equal to any other humans (some are of course still pushing the question of whether they are human).
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  3  
Wed 18 Apr, 2018 07:42 am
@blatham,
CBC Radio 1 just had an interesting piece on this. The full episode is up now - they'll have it broken down later today. http://www.cbc.ca/radio/thecurrent/the-current-for-april-18-2018-1.4623673

One of the issues - should #45's twitter account be suspended? I belong to a forum owned by a guy who's gone on to beone of twitter's leads - #45 would have been long gone and I know banning his twitter account has been considered - as it's a source of hate speech.

A2k has been blocked by my American employer because of the hate sites which are regularly linked by one of the posters in this thread.
blatham
 
  1  
Wed 18 Apr, 2018 07:47 am
@ehBeth,
Quote:
I think Mr. Connolly has got it very wrong.
Absolutely right. And it gets me thinking that a necessary rebranding of the GOP post-Trump will be that "real conservatives" are independent of mind and motivated by traditional principles. Not unthinking followers, we.
blatham
 
  1  
Wed 18 Apr, 2018 07:51 am
@ehBeth,
Quote:
A2k has been blocked by my American employer because of the hate sites which are regularly linked by one of the posters in this thread.
Possibly one of those who deem that it is inappropriate for Canadians (or Germans or Brits or Australians) to arrogantly comment on American politics and culture.
0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  1  
Wed 18 Apr, 2018 07:52 am
@ehBeth,
The democrat you are speaking about was not talking about Halley's personal credibility but her credibility to represent Washington when she is in her role at the UN. If Halley makes another announcement of what the US will do or not do, others at the UN could understandably think or say, "we should wait until Trump speaks tomorrow..."

But yes, she ends up the winner in this spat.
Walter Hinteler
 
  4  
Wed 18 Apr, 2018 07:55 am
@blatham,
Trump has contradicted today his 2017 statement that he ousted the FBI director last year over the probe.

https://i.imgur.com/6s8QfTkl.jpg


Quote:
Two days after dismissing Comey, Trump had explained why he did it in a televised interview with NBC News.

“In fact when I decided to just do it, I said to myself, I said, ‘You know, this Russia thing with Trump and Russia is a made-up story,” he said. “It’s an excuse by the Democrats for having lost an election that they should have won.”
reuters
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.42 seconds on 05/17/2024 at 10:48:25