@georgeob1,
Quote:Your argument is fallacious on several points. Socialism, even in the moderate forms found in Europe, has proven to the a generally enervating economic system that yields few benefits for the loss of freedom and social/economic creativity it involves.
Let's be accurate here and rewrite your claim as "even in the moderate forms found in Europe
and New Zealand and Australia and Canada the United States".
We've been through this before. There is no example of a broadly prosperous and free nation now or ever which operates without redistribution of wealth and without large social programs in place nor without significant controls on the certain tendencies of unfettered capitalism. Not one.
Quote:(Indeed a strong case can be made for the proposition that long term political and stability is best achieved in Republics with built in mechanisms allowing a cycle between left & right wing governments - thus avoiding the excesses of both.)
That's sane if we define "republic" to include Japan, Britain, Norway, etc.
Otherwise, your post is a typical example of the false dilemma I'm pointing to, bolstered for you by what you presume are axiomatic truths (European nations
must be less free - nothing else is possible).