@revelette1,
revelette1 wrote:I don't know too much about guns in spite of my husband owning several. So perhaps you could answer a question. Do either a semiautomatic handgun or sawed off shotgun do as much damage in the same amount of time as a AR-15
Probably not. Handgun rounds are much less deadly. Shotguns (especially short barreled ones) do not carry very many rounds.
revelette1 wrote:or another similar assault (whatever) gun?
An assault weapon is just a rifle with a pistol grip or other cosmetic feature on it. It does not do any more or less damage than the same gun without the offending cosmetic feature.
revelette1 wrote:Is it just a matter of a cosmetic (right word?) feature which turns one of those into a deadly weapon such a mass shooter's weapons of choice which has been an AR-15?
The distinction of the assault weapon label is all about cosmetic features. Being cosmetic, those features have nothing to do with why an AR-15 is so deadly.
So, no. Adding a cosmetic feature is not what turns them into such deadly weapons.
What makes them deadly is the fact that they are a rifle with a large magazine. Rifle rounds are far deadlier than handgun rounds. They also punch through Kevlar (without losing any of their deadliness when they do so). And the large magazine lets the shooter fire many times.
They are not the mass shooters' weapons of choice however. Mass shooters seem to prefer handguns. Although the potential for devastation is far greater when a mass shooter uses a rifle with a large magazine.
revelette1 wrote:If so to the last, then while we are banning assault weapons, ban those too.
Sawed off shotguns are fairly restricted already, and the legal ones are not any problem in shooting sprees or other crime.
The illegal sawed off shotguns are already illegal.
Banning semi-auto handguns would run afoul of the Constitution and Supreme Court (to say nothing of the NRA).
You're not going to be banning assault weapons. The NRA will stop that from passing.
And if the NRA didn't stop it, the fact that there isn't a good reason for banning cosmetic features means that such laws will be ruled unconstitutional in coming years.