192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
izzythepush
 
  3  
Sat 24 Feb, 2018 01:46 pm
@MontereyJack,
Iain Banks is a very good writer, his Sci Fi stuff is OK but it's not a patch on his other writing, it's far less challenging.

Don't let the person recommending him put you off. The Wasp Factory is a fantastic first novel and is studied at A level over here. Well worth a read.
0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
BillW
 
  2  
Sat 24 Feb, 2018 01:46 pm
@revelette1,
revelette1 wrote:

My goodness, unbelievable.

The republicans today are the democrats of the south years ago.

They were, anyways - the rigth wing extremists of the party....
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  7  
Sat 24 Feb, 2018 01:57 pm
@oralloy,
oralloy says:
Quote:

And now you want to try to pretend that the NRA isn't protecting our rights?


They sure did a shitty job of protecting the dead Parkland students' and teachers' rights. And Vegas concert-goers' rights. And Newtown students' rights.
blatham
 
  4  
Sat 24 Feb, 2018 02:01 pm
@farmerman,
Quote:
My point is that this is too important for any side to claim some kind of righteousness. Polarization will not fix a damn thing. It merely makes each side dig in farther.That results in NOTHING getting done, and maybe itll be your kids in the line of fire next time. Think about that.
If these gun ownership issues were merely a matter of differences in opinion relatively available for reflection, I'd agree. But there are billions of dollars involved in weapons production, weapons sales, weapons promotion, lobbying, and electoral donations. And much of that is built upon a very purposeful campaign by the NRA to resist any regulations on ownership or on when/where such weapons can be brought into civic environments.

Failing to oppose the NRA will not, I think, get you anything of what you or I would like to see come about. Polarization is in place and the present economic and political dynamics push towards the continuation of what is going on. Level heads and compromise are not presently available. And I think the only way out is robust activism.

To use an obvious if trite example, the civil rights movement changed America not through avoiding polarization and fixed ideas.
revelette1
 
  3  
Sat 24 Feb, 2018 03:32 pm
Quote:
WASHINGTON — House Democrats released a heavily redacted memorandum on Saturday that was drafted to counter Republican claims that top F.B.I. and Justice Department officials had abused their powers in spying on a former Trump campaign aide.

President Trump blocked the memo’s outright release two weeks ago, with the White House counsel warning that the document “contains numerous properly classified and especially sensitive passages.” Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee had since been haggling with the F.B.I. over redactions.

Democrats have insisted that Mr. Trump’s deference to national security concerns in the case was hypocritical and politically motivated. Just a week before blocking their memo’s release, the president had ignored similar objections from the Justice Department and the F.B.I. to declassify the contents of a rival Republican memo, which was based on the same underlying documents. Mr. Trump asserted, incorrectly, that the Republican document vindicated him in the special counsel investigation into Russian election interference.



NYT
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  4  
Sat 24 Feb, 2018 03:39 pm
@oralloy,
Good fellow for providing some source material.

You are exaggerating, however, when you refer to "vets who cannot balance their checkbooks". If their affairs are managed by appointed fiduciary trustees, their problems exceed the inability to balance a checkbook, and the provisions of the Brady Bill prohibit them from buying a gun. It's the law. It would seem that a better way of dealing with those who feel they have to competence to handle a weapon and not endanger themselves or others would be through some sort of appeal process. (Which I think was the idea behind Burr's bill.) Dealing with individual cases is better than a wholesale repeal of the provision because some of those people truly are incompetent.
Quote:

Seeking tighter controls over firearm purchases, the Obama administration is pushing to ban Social Security beneficiaries from owning guns if they lack the mental capacity to manage their own affairs, a move that could affect millions whose monthly disability payments are handled by others.

The push is intended to bring the Social Security Administration in line with laws regulating who gets reported to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, or NICS, which is used to prevent gun sales to felons, drug addicts, immigrants in the country illegally and others.

A potentially large group within Social Security are people who, in the language of federal gun laws, are unable to manage their own affairs due to "marked subnormal intelligence, or mental illness, incompetency, condition, or disease."

LA Times
Quote:
Military veterans whose Veterans Affairs benefits are managed on their behalf by appointed fiduciary trustees are deemed “mentally defective” and reported to the FBI’s National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS), a computerized database which prohibits them from purchasing firearms.

Daily Caller

The posts from Lash and me were obviously referring to troubled individuals and weren't suggesting that a whole class of citizens should be prohibited from owning weapons.




Glennn
 
  -1  
Sat 24 Feb, 2018 04:08 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:
I'm not a doctor and don't play one on TV. . .

That's exactly what I was thinking.
Quote:
Pharmaceuticals have been a huge boon for humanity, but like everything else under the sun, there are problems associated with them.

Yeah, that's the point I was making. You must have thought that it bears repeating. On that, you are correct! I think it bears repeating again.

So:

Soon after the introduction of the first selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), fluoxetine (Prozac) into the United States marketplace in January 1988, reports began to appear describing fluoxetine-induced violence against self and others. In May 1990 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration required the manufacturer of Prozac, Eli Lilly and Company, to add “suicidal ideation” and “violent behaviors” to the Post Introduction Reports section of its label. In 2003 the British Committee on the Safety of Medicines and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued warnings about increased rates of self-harm and suicidal behavior in children and youth under the age of 18 exposed to paroxetine (Paxil). Most recently, on August 22, 2003, the manufacturer of venlafaxine (Effexor) issued a similar “Dear Doctor” letter warning about the increased risk of “hostility and suicide-related adverse events, such as suicidal ideation and self-harm” in children age 6 to seventeen.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________

I've highlighted the pertinent parts so that you wouldn't miss them this time.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote:
From what I can tell, you are an intelligent free-thinker, but you are also a conspiracy nut.

I've provided you with information and the source of that information. The information comes from others who outrank you when it comes to credibility concerning this issue. I can only assume that you suspect that the individuals responsible for the information I provided you are involved in some kind of conspiracy against the pharmaceutical companies.

But probably what's more likely is that your reaction to being shown something from a credible source that doesn't support your opinion caused you to resort to the old tried and true "conspiracy nut" insult as a kind of consolation for yourself.
Finn dAbuzz
 
  -1  
Sat 24 Feb, 2018 05:13 pm
@Glennn,
You must be right.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Sat 24 Feb, 2018 05:24 pm
Quote:
US billionaire Warren Buffet says his conglomerate has received a profit boost of $29bn (£20bn) as a result of President Donald Trump's tax reforms, he says.

Berkshire Hathaway reported a record quarterly and annual profit on Saturday.

The Republican law reform, approved in December, cut the corporate tax rate to 21% from 35%.

Mr Buffett, one of the richest men in the world, opposed the plan.

In his letter to investors, Mr Buffett said the tax cut accounted for nearly half of the firm's gain in net worth during 2017.

Republicans have argued that the tax reform will boost economic growth.

Passing the bill through Congress was a major victory for President Trump. He called it "the largest tax cut in the history of our country" and a gift to the nation.

The reforms give the vast majority of taxpayers lower tax bills in the immediate future. However those cuts expire in 2025.

Mr Buffett, who believes in higher taxes for the rich, has said he would have preferred a different tax bill.

"A large portion of our gain did not come from anything we accomplished at Berkshire," he wrote. "Only $36 billion came from Berkshire's operations. The remaining $29 billion was delivered to us in December when Congress rewrote the US Tax Code."

Non-partisan analysts had said the greatest beneficiaries of the tax package would be multinational corporations.

Last month Barclays, a British bank, predicted that Berkshire Hathaway would be a major beneficiary. It said that after an initial windfall, its earnings could continue to rise by 12% on an ongoing basis.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-43183737
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Sat 24 Feb, 2018 05:33 pm
@oralloy,
The only ones more to blame than the ones paying the bribes are the ones taking them, in my opinion. Our whores in Congress.
Glennn
 
  0  
Sat 24 Feb, 2018 05:43 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:
You must be right.

Concerning the last two paragraphs of my post? You bet.

Concerning the first part of my post, I'm afraid I can't take credit for that.

That would be these guys: http://breggin.com/wp-content/uploads/2005/01/31-49.pdf
Finn dAbuzz
 
  -2  
Sat 24 Feb, 2018 05:47 pm
@Lash,
The NRA is a favorite scapegoat for many people.

It does not, and cannot, however, force any member of Congress to vote in a certain way.

It has millions of members which gives it electoral clout, just like any other organization that attempts to represent the wishes of its membership.

If it was not representing the views of its membership it would lose paying members and that would be that.

It spends the dues it collects from members to advance their interests.

OMG! How horrible! We can't have that in America!

Lobbying is always a matter of whose ox is being gored, and anyone who thinks that there are only right-wing lobbyists is a fool. (and a ******* fool to boot)

Lobbyists with great amounts of cash wouldn't have as much influence as they do if we didn't have career politicians who are motivated more by retaining power and status than doing the right thing.

The NRA doesn't pay bribes.

Finn dAbuzz
 
  -2  
Sat 24 Feb, 2018 05:49 pm
@Glennn,
Again, you must be right.
Lash
 
  1  
Sat 24 Feb, 2018 05:53 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
The NRA does pay bribes. All lobbyists finesse this corruption through dubious barely-legal processes.

I agree with your comment that only corrupt politicians make lobbyists and their rich benefactors powerful.
Finn dAbuzz
 
  -2  
Sat 24 Feb, 2018 06:00 pm
@Lash,
If you care about the health of poor pre-schoolers and contribute to a candidate that you believe will do something about it, have you paid a bribe?

If so, then I agree the NRA pays bribes.
ehBeth
 
  2  
Sat 24 Feb, 2018 06:10 pm
https://www.courier-journal.com/story/news/politics/2018/02/16/trump-metoo-kentucky-women-running-legislature/1077231001/
Glennn
 
  0  
Sat 24 Feb, 2018 06:38 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:
Again, you must be right.

There it is!! It's down there!!
Go git it boy!!!! Follow the dots boy!!
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Last word
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Sat 24 Feb, 2018 07:09 pm
@hightor,
As Eric Boehlert just tweeted
"it's like, teens: 21, NRA:0"
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.45 seconds on 01/16/2025 at 02:07:37