@camlok,
camlok wrote:He is with the Department of History, University of Chicago.
The funniest things about the retards that you cite are when they start throwing around terms like "radioactive atomicity".
The retards believe that all radioactive atoms are equally dangerous. They don't believe in half lives, either in context of the duration of the radioactivity or the intensity of the radioactivity. The question of a radioactive isotope's chemical affinity for biological processes is totally beyond them.
Even funnier yet, the retards don't comprehend that the fragments of split atoms might also be radioactive.
So in the eyes of the retards, the Hiroshima bomb was an incredibly dirty (in terms of radioactive fallout) weapon because its very low efficiency resulted in few uranium atoms being split. In their eyes, if all of those atoms had been split, the bomb would have been perfectly clean.
The only thing worse than the Hiroshima bomb in their eyes, is an anti-tank shell made from depleted uranium. Since
none of the uranium atoms are split when an anti-tank shell is fired, the retards think that every time someone fires a DU anti-tank shell it causes unparalleled global devastation that no nuclear weapon could possibly match.
https://encrypted.google.com/search?hl=en&q=site%3Aglobalresearch.ca%20%22atomicity%22
---
BTW, fun trivia fact: America's DU anti-tank shells contain trace amounts of weapons-grade plutonium. This is because unlike the DU that is sometimes used as ballast in airliners (which is a byproduct of the enrichment process), the DU used in our anti-tank shells is a byproduct of the plutonium production reactors that we used to make all of our weapons-grade plutonium.
The radioactivity from the trace amounts of plutonium makes the danger from the shell's radioactivity exceed the danger from chemical toxicity (heavy metal poisoning) posed by the shell. If it were uranium alone, the chemical toxicity would outweigh the danger from radioactivity.
We're still talking very low levels of danger though -- unless you climb around inside a destroyed tank or let kids play in the dirt next to one. That would be a bad idea.
camlok wrote:What level of expertise do you have?
100%.
camlok wrote:It is truly amazing, you call others retards, folks who are professionals and deal in the truth, science and facts
If you are so impressed with them, try using high level nuclear waste as a topping for your breakfast cereal. Your retards say that radioactive atoms are only harmful
before they've been split.