@izzythepush,
We’re wasting a lot of space due to semantics.
If nothing was wrong with architecture of the NHS, the protest would not have happened.
The protest, as far as I’m aware, doesn’t complain about healthcare workers, but the system’s reliance on politicians to fund it properly—a problem that would be exponentially magnified by the comparative pack of jackals the US calls government. This funding problem is definitely a cause for concern by other countries considering adoption of the NHS style of healthcare delivery. Like mine.
People deserve healthcare. Poor human beings shouldn’t die or hurt because they can’t afford medication, surgery, or care.
I advocate universal healthcare, but I’m increasingly distrustful of the people I’d have to
1. Send a lot more money to, and
2. Trust to spend the money efficiently, prioritizing masses’ health
It’s easier for me to believe in Martians.
The protest did happen. That is my point. There is a problem. Countries and individuals considering - certainly advocating - a similar healthcare delivery system must carefully review the success and failures of current exemplar operating systems.
These are just bare unimpeachable facts.
If you can remove your emotions from this discussion, you’d have to agree.
While I’ve immensely enjoyed your input and suggestions in other conversations, I’m not going to defend who I am, nor will I shy away from discussing topics I find interesting or important. I’m sure you don’t censure yourself out of homage to others’ sensibilities. As with all of us, you are free to reach any conclusion you please and respond accordingly.