monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

How does anyone imagine that a free and functioning democracy can be maintained when those in power lie with such facility every day?

Wray alluded to having seen aspects of the IG's report into the way the FBI handled the investigation into Hillary Clinton's use of a private e-mail server.

The lefties on this site and in the MSM truly have their heads jammed into the echo chambers and have the sound turned way up!

That person would already be in prison through the bipartasan efforts of the Dems and Repukes. Why? because the Dems are Americans first while the Repukes are just, well, traitors or never were Americans. Not all mind you, but the ones that aren't need to stand up and be counted,(AND AGREE WITH BILLYBOY HERE) otherwise they too are traitors! I fully appauld those that already have.

The lefties on this site and in the MSM truly have their heads jammed into the echo chambers and have the sound turned way up!

Is there some law or code of conduct which makes it illegal or unethical for federal agents to have and express political opinions? Maybe we should scour all the e-mails sent by agents investigating Mrs. Clinton, you know, just to make sure no agent ever said anything negative about her, ever voted for a Republican, or had any family members who ever ran for office as a Republican.

TRANSLATION:

Why do you types always have to be so disenginous

“Weak people cannot be sincere.”

There is nothing to this memo but conjecture and assumptions

FBI officials review surveillance memo, could not cite 'any factual inaccuracies'

Two senior FBI officials have now reviewed a controversial Republican staff memo alleging abuses of government surveillance programs during the 2016 presidential campaign, a source familiar with the matter told Fox News – adding that the officials “could not point to any factual inaccuracies.”

The two officials – one from the bureau’s counterintelligence division and the other from the legal division – followed up after an initial review of the memo during a rare Sunday trip to Capitol Hill by FBI Director Christopher Wray.

Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., indicated that the FBI and Justice Department had “fought tooth and nail” for close to a year to avoid providing the surveillance-related records to Congress.

The Page-Strzok text exchanges might offer a few answers. Or, as Lisa Page warned her paramour as early as February 2016, at the beginning of the campaign and well before the respective party nominees were even selected:

One more thing: she [Hillary Clinton] might be our next president. The last thing you need us going in there loaded for bear. You think she’s going to remember or care that it was more doj than fbi?

That is, the current players probably broke laws and committed ethical violations not just because they were assured there would be no consequences but also because they thought they’d be rewarded for their laxity.

How could Lynch in the middle of an election have been so silly as to allow even the appearance of impropriety? Answer: There would have been no impropriety had Hillary won — an assumption reflected in the Page-Strzok text trove when Page texted, about Lynch, “She knows no charges will be brought.” In fact, after a Clinton victory, Lynch’s obsequiousness in devising such a clandestine meeting with Bill Clinton may well have been rewarded: Clinton allies leaked to the New York Times that Clinton was considering keeping Lynch on as the attorney general.

In short, such hubris was not just what Peter Strzok in August 2016 termed an “insurance policy” against an unlikely Trump victory. Instead, the Clinton and Obama officials believed that it was within the administrative state’s grasp and their perceived political interest not just to beat but to destroy and humiliate Donald Trump — and by extension all the distasteful deplorables and irredeemables he supposedly had galvanized.

The corruption is epic and utterly disgusting.

Why do you types always have to be so disenginous.