192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
hightor
 
  2  
Mon 29 Jan, 2018 06:29 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:

Do you know the regulations that Trump is doing away with which will result in people being injured or dying?

You didn't mention environmental damage so as far as mine safety goes the concerns are about the people who are being appointed, access to affordable health care for black lung victims, and further deregulation and repeal of legislation. Coal mine deaths are increasing but this may partly be due to the arrival of new inexperienced miners. Zardoz draws attention to this administration's preference for profits over health, safety, and the environment.

With the scuttling of much of the EPA's mission, resulting in a loss of scientists and research assistants, it's possible that we could be setting the stage for catastrophic environmental damage or public health emergencies in the future, like a tailings pond disaster, groundwater pollution from fracking chemicals, or coal industry-related chemical spills as happened in the 2014 Elk River incident.

0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  4  
Mon 29 Jan, 2018 06:33 am
@ehBeth,
Quote:
I think people just don't expect much of Mrs. #45. They think HRC is a responsible adult woman. Though why she should be responsible for the actions of other people is a mystery.
These two women are an interesting contrast for sure. More accurately though, the critical contrast is in the way each has been regarded and treated by political players as this brings the misogyny of the right into clear view.

Not much is expected of Melania because it is understood by everyone that she's where she is because of her beauty. She has demonstrated no particular political interests or preferences or ambitions, she clearly doesn't enjoy the media limelight as first lady and she is mostly and unusually silent for a modern first lady. In other words, she is a rather ideal woman for a certain sort of retrograde right wing mind. - she's eye candy, she keeps her mouth shut and doesn't challenge men's power. Hillary is quite a different sort of woman and it's a sort that this retrograde right wing mind does not like.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -4  
Mon 29 Jan, 2018 07:00 am
@layman,
layman wrote:

Obama and the FBI colluded to cover up his complicity with Clinton's crimes


Plenty of evidence has now surfaced to prove that the "fix was in" to let Hillary Clinton get away with her crimes. But, ya know, that's actually been obvious for a long-ass time. Exposure of the deal the FBI cut with Cheryl Mills, et al, to grant them immunity and consent to them destroying massive amounts of evidence told you all you needed to know, and that came to light over a year ago.

Quote:
Published October 03, 2016:

Cheryl Mills, Hillary Clinton's former chief of staff, received an immunity deal from the Justice Department during the year-long FBI investigation of Clinton's server.

Two other State Department staffers, John Bentel and Heather Samuelson, were also given immunity agreements, bringing the total number of witnesses who were protected by deals to five.

Immunity deals for two top Hillary Clinton aides included a side arrangement obliging the FBI to destroy their laptops after reviewing the devices, House Judiciary Committee sources revealed on Monday.


Know what I'm sayin?
blatham
 
  2  
Mon 29 Jan, 2018 07:02 am
The Netanyahu family (kind of like the Adams family but worse)
Quote:
Just how much damage his wife and son have done to Mr. Netanyahu’s political standing is difficult to assess, since he faces scandals of his own.
NYT
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  2  
Mon 29 Jan, 2018 07:24 am
More on the Koch boys
Quote:
Tim Phillips, president of Americans for Prosperity, the network’s main advocacy arm, praised Trump’s staff for involving the network in talks “from day one” about what a tax code overhaul might look like.

Phillips said 2017 was “the most productive year . . . in the existence of this network” at the federal level. “A lot of the policies they’ve put forward in the first year have been good ones,” he said.

He added, “We really don’t get caught up in all the other extraneous stuff out there.”
That last added comment refers to things like the expansive Russian campaign to choose America's president. Not important.
Below viewing threshold (view)
blatham
 
  2  
Mon 29 Jan, 2018 07:27 am
OK, now I'm getting really worried
Quote:
Something amazing will happen with the moon on Jan. 31
There will be a full moon, a blue moon, a supermoon and a total lunar eclipse — all in one day.
WP
revelette1
 
  2  
Mon 29 Jan, 2018 07:28 am
Secret Memo Hints at a New Republican Target: Rod Rosenstein (NYT)

So all this beef is about conspiracy theories from Representative Nunes regarding Rosenstein getting a warrant to Page under surveillance? Nunes contends Rosenstein must have relied on the disputed report from Christopher Steele to obtain that warrant and didn't adequately reveal to the intelligence judge that fact? Democrats who have seen the memo said those who put together this memo cherry picked information to create a misleading narrative.

If they release the memo, it is only fair they release the information they relied on, in full, to form the memo.
blatham
 
  2  
Mon 29 Jan, 2018 07:42 am
The convenience of dishonesty.
Quote:
On Fox News Sunday, host Chris Wallace displayed a shocking lack of self-awareness when he asked his guest, Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC), if “Republicans hurt their credibility on real issues of bias when they make such a big deal about secret societies and palace coups?” referring to the GOP hyping a text message between two FBI employees referencing a "secret society." Wallace ignored Fox News’ role in hyping the texts, airing the term "secret society" over 100 times on Fox News over the course of two days, before stopping abruptly after it was reported the “secret society” reference was likely a joke.
MM
blatham
 
  2  
Mon 29 Jan, 2018 07:44 am
@revelette1,
Quote:
it is only fair
Fairness is the last thing these boys want or value.
Below viewing threshold (view)
blatham
 
  2  
Mon 29 Jan, 2018 08:05 am
The happy convenience of dishonesty when mixed with yuge dollops of ignorance
Quote:
President Trump has a long history of mind-bogglingly foolish statements about climate change, the most notorious of which is probably his 2012 Twitter declaration that the phenomenon is merely a Chinese hoax.

On Sunday, he added another whopper to his least-greatest hits collection.

Speaking to kindred spirit Piers Morgan on the British network ITV, Trump said that, despite what you may have heard, the polar ice caps are actually thriving.

“The ice caps were going to melt, they were going to be gone by now, but now they’re setting records,” he said.
NYMag
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Mon 29 Jan, 2018 08:11 am
@blatham,
It's by now even noticed in Germany:
Under Donald Trump, socialism seeps into US mainstream
Quote:
American socialists have been celebrating a comeback at the same time as approval ratings for Republican president Donald Trump and the opposition Democratic Party have hit all-time lows.

At the end of his first year in office, only 39 percent of Americans approved of the job President Donald Trump was doing in office – lower than any US president at that point in his term in at least 40 years. His opponents the Democrats, however, are not doing much better. According to a poll late last year, only 37 percent of Americans had a favorable view of Democratic politicians in general.

To find a political tendency that hasn't suffered from the last year, you would have to look further to the left in American politics. Socialist organizations, long relegated to the sidelines of influence or even persecuted for their views, have seen their numbers grow considerably since Trump entered the White House.

One organization in particular has experienced a surge in membership. The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), founded in 1982, had roughly 6,000 dues-paying members for the duration of its history. Then, in the two days following Trump's election, 1,000 people joined DSA. Today the organization claims to have around 25,000 card-carrying members, having tripled its size in just over one year. This would make it the largest socialist membership organization in the US since the Second World War.

... ... ...
blatham
 
  2  
Mon 29 Jan, 2018 08:15 am
Prediction:
If Donald Trump, during his SOTU speech, does not drop his drawers and take a dump, he will be feted as "presidential" or as having "turned a new leaf and reset his administration and image" or some such.
blatham
 
  2  
Mon 29 Jan, 2018 08:17 am
Quote:
Jane Mayer
‏@JaneMayerNYer
More Jane Mayer Retweeted Matea Gold
WashPost puff piece on Kochs neglects to note their interest in criminal justice reform began when their company was charged with crimes.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  2  
Mon 29 Jan, 2018 08:20 am
From Jay Rosen
Quote:
Normalizing Trump: An incredibly brief explainer
A conflict in the journalist's code was created by a president wholly unfit for the job.
17 SEP 2017 1:12 AM
Most every journalist who covers Trump knows of these things:

1. He isn’t good at anything a president has to do. From the simplest, like pretending to help out in flood relief, to the hardest: making the call when all alternatives are bad. (We’re told he can be charming one-on-one. So maybe that’s his one skill.)

2. He doesn’t know anything about the issues with which he must cope. Nor does this seem to bother him.

3. He doesn’t care to learn. It’s not like he’s getting better at the job, or scrambling to fill gaps in his knowledge.

4. He has no views about public policy. Just a few brute prejudices, like if Obama did it, it was dumb. I do not say he lacks beliefs — and white supremacy may be one — but he has no positions. His political sky is blank. No stars to steer by.

5. Nothing he says can be trusted.

6. His “model” of leadership is the humiliation of others— and threat of same. No analyst unfamiliar with narcissistic personality types can hope to make sense of his actions in office.

It’s not like items 1-6 have been kept secret. Journalists tell us about them all the time. Their code requires that. Simultaneously, however, they are called by their code to respect the voters’ choice, as well as the American presidency, of which they see themselves a vital part, as well as the beat, the job of White House reporting. The two parts of the code are in conflict.

If nothing the president says can be trusted, reporting what the president says becomes absurd. You can still do it, but it’s hard to respect what you are doing. If the president doesn’t know anything, the solemnity of the presidency becomes a joke. That’s painful. If they can, people flee that kind of pain. In political journalism there is enough room for interpretive maneuver to do just that.

This is “normalization.” This is what “tonight he became president” is about. This is why he’s called “transactional,” why a turn to bipartisanship is right now being test-marketed by headline writers. This is why “deal-making” is said to be afoot when there is barely any evidence of a deal.

What they have to report brings ruin to what they have to respect. So they occasionally revise it into something they can respect: at least a little.
layman
 
  -4  
Mon 29 Jan, 2018 08:21 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:

It's by now even noticed in Germany:
Under Donald Trump, socialism seeps into US mainstream
Quote:
One organization in particular has experienced a surge in membership. The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), founded in 1982.... Today the organization claims to have around 25,000 card-carrying members... This would make it the largest socialist membership organization in the US since the Second World Wa



WOW!! 25,000, ya say! A crew like that could probably almost fill the outfield bleachers at a typical major league baseball game on any given Saturday, eh!? No, I don't mean at all 15-20 games being played, I just mean at one of them.
Below viewing threshold (view)
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Mon 29 Jan, 2018 09:07 am
@layman,
layman wrote:
WOW!! 25,000, ya say!
It's only a third of the membership in our Socialist party (Die Linke ["the Left") here (62,300), but I think it is quite a number for the US. And a huge increase of the membership.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.47 seconds on 11/05/2024 at 06:04:31