192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
ehBeth
 
  2  
Mon 29 Jan, 2018 09:17 am
@blatham,
blatham wrote:
Quote:
Something amazing will happen with the moon on Jan. 31
There will be a full moon, a blue moon, a supermoon and a total lunar eclipse — all in one day.
WP


someone at WP needs a good editor
georgeob1
 
  -4  
Mon 29 Jan, 2018 09:59 am
@blatham,
So far no real evidence of the existence of an" expansive Russian campaign to choose America's next President" has emerged. We certainly saw some Russian hacking and efforts to disrupt and possibly discredit the process, but there is nothing new in that. Perhaps you have some specific information or citations to back up your assertion.

Indeed after the silly "reset button" and Hillary's likely paid accommodation in the purchase of uranium assets, Putin had every reason to believe he could continue with her as he did with Obama. ( I suspect Trump looked a bit unpredictable to him). Here one recalls Obama's whispered request to then President Medvedev that he tell Vladimir that he (Obama) will have much more flexibility to be accommodating after our election.
revelette1
 
  2  
Mon 29 Jan, 2018 10:34 am
Nearly half of Americans believe Trump tried to obstruct the Russia investigation (WP)

Quote:
As expected, the majority of groups that have consistently been critical of Trump, such as liberals, African Americans and millennials, believe Trump’s behavior could have been obstruction of justice.

But so do groups such as independents — swing voters that Trump relied on to get elected. More than half — 51 percent — believe that Trump directly tried to interfere in the investigation.

Trump often blasts his political opponents for supporting the investigation, pointing to their bitterness over Democratic rival Hillary Clinton’s loss as their primary motivation.

But he seems to believe that the public agrees with him that the idea of a “Russian hoax,” meaning the investigation, is dead. He tweeted:

“Do you notice the Fake News Mainstream Media never likes covering the great and record setting economic news, but rather talks about anything negative or that can be turned into the negative. The Russian Collusion Hoax is dead, except as it pertains to the Dems. Public gets it!”

But sizable percentages of the demographic groups that helped elect Trump think Trump’s campaign colluded with Russia, including:

More than a quarter — 27 percent — of Americans who identify as “conservative.”

More than a third — 36 percent — of white non-college Americans.

More than four in 10 — 43 percent — of Americans 65 and older believe Trump interfered.

More than a third — 36 percent — of white men believe he interfered.

Trump’s historically low approval ratings aren’t just because the people who voted against him in 2016 remain critical of the president’s vision for America. The president is struggling to keep those who voted for him to continue to support him.


revelette1
 
  2  
Mon 29 Jan, 2018 10:36 am
TRUMP-RUSSIA INVESTIGATION: 'EXTRAORDINARILY IMPORTANT' NEW DOCUMENTS OFFER FRESH REVELATIONS, TOP DEMOCRAT SAYS (Newsweek

(Caps came with the title of the piece)
layman
 
  -4  
Mon 29 Jan, 2018 10:40 am
@revelette1,
Mueller's authority is limited to investigating (and prosecuting, if appropriate) actual crimes, not what "people believe." 100% of the people I seen on this thread who believe that Trump "obstructed justice" clearly don't even know what it means, as a legal matter.
0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
hightor
 
  4  
Mon 29 Jan, 2018 10:46 am
@revelette1,
Well it's comforting to know that if some truly blockbusting discovery is made the Republicans will simply shut down the investigation and release their "memo" outlining how unfair and biased the whole charade has been. And Trump will bomb North Korea or Iran to change the subject.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  2  
Mon 29 Jan, 2018 11:02 am
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

OK, now I'm getting really worried
Quote:
Something amazing will happen with the moon on Jan. 31
There will be a full moon, a blue moon, a supermoon and a total lunar eclipse — all in one day.
WP


Actually, it is much "worse", it will be " a full moon, a blue moon, a supermoon and a total lunar eclipse — all in one day", and, a red moon! So, it is to be a red, blue moon.
oristarA
 
  0  
Mon 29 Jan, 2018 11:04 am
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DUmSH6zVwAAmr7m.jpg
layman
 
  -3  
Mon 29 Jan, 2018 11:04 am
@revelette1,
This excerpt is from the rag which conducted the interview, not a disgrace like Newsweak that selectively "summarizes" it, eh?

Quote:
On the revelations contained in the latest document dumps, for example, Warner says the panel still cannot attest to their “veracity or truthfulness” and is now “trying to either corroborate or not” by calling up to a dozen new witnesses. He also says that the allegations contained in the dossier compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele and made public last year remain neither “proven nor, conversely, disproven” despite the extensive investigations.

That's pretty amazing,” he says, “because as long as that sits out there, there's going to be a cloud that hangs over this administration.” With the 2018 midterm elections set to begin little more than a month from now, Warner says that’s still the big story...


https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/01/29/mark-warner-global-politico-216545

1. Ya can't "disprove" something (like whores pissing on beds) that never happened in the first place. If Mueller thinks he has anything on Trump, he has to PROVE it. Trump has no obligation whatsoever to "disprove" it.

2. He says "more questions" have arisen that will extend the investigation indefinitely, eh? I wonder why? Maybe because "as long as that sits out there, there's going to be a cloud that hangs over this administration," eh?
Finn dAbuzz
 
  -3  
Mon 29 Jan, 2018 11:15 am
https://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2018/01/this-civil-war-my-south-carolina-tea.html

The only problem with this is he's giving the Republican establishment a free pass.
Finn dAbuzz
 
  -1  
Mon 29 Jan, 2018 11:23 am



The Koch Brothers’ Rorschach Test

Saturday afternoon at the Koch winter meeting, I was watching a panel of leaders from community-building and social-capital-building nonprofits: the Cara Program in Chicago, which helps workplace skills; Phoenix Multisport, a Boston-based peer-to-peer recovery organization for young addicts; Rising Tide Capital, which helps low-income individuals start businesses in Jersey City, New Jersey; and Chrysalis, which helps low-income and homeless individuals in Los Angeles prepare for, find, and retain employment.

The Koch network doesn’t single-handedly keep these organizations going, but their financial and operational assistance is considerable. Stand Together, part of the Koch network of organizations, provided Rising Tide $350,000 last year; the group’s annual budget is $5 million.

It struck me that the reaction to the Koch brothers is a pretty good example of how politics has gotten worse over the past two decades. (Alternatively, if you believe American politics has been getting worse for a long time, that worsening accelerated in just the past decade or so.) To hear Harry Reid and a lot of Democrats tell it, they’re “the shadowy Koch brothers.” David Axelrod called them “contract killers.” Liberal columnist Mark Morford once compared them to a combination of “a ruthless drug kingpin, a mafia crime lord, the willful blindness of the NRA, the combined CEOs of Monsanto, Exxon, and RJ Reynolds and a couple scared old wolverines with God complex and a penchant for contaminating the world.” A documentary labeled them “the one percent at its very worst.”

The very worst? They donate more to charity that most of us will ever earn in our entire lives. David Koch and his charitable foundation have pledged or contributed “more than $1.2 billion to cancer research, medical centers, educational institutions, arts and cultural institutions, and to assist public policy organizations.” The Charles Koch Foundation donates tens of millions of dollars to colleges and universities each year; in 2014, it gave $25 million to the United Negro College Fund.

Yes, the Kochs are libertarian-leaning, free-market advocates for limited government and a big supporter of a lot of Republicans. As noted last year, they’ve rolled up big wins in large part because they don’t just throw up a bunch of television ads. Their organizations like Americans for Prosperity and the Libre Initiative are established to operate 365 days a year, not just around election time. Their organizations pay attention to state legislatures and state attorney generals. They notice and get involved in local tax fights like a referendum on a light rail plan for Nashville.

One can argue about the merits of this policy or that one. But if our national political discourse were better, saner, and more accurate, the Kochs would be universally seen as generous guys who are completely convinced that private organizations, non-profits, and free enterprise can tackle the country’s biggest problems. Maybe they have too much faith in the free market; the nonprofits mentioned above said they get about ten percent of their funding from government grants. But they’re not evil, they’re not greedy, and you don’t invite two dozen reporters to your organization’s meeting if you’re “shadowy.”

Of course, they’re just one vivid example of a broader trend: the Kochs can’t just be wealthy guys with a clear philosophy on how to fix the world’s problems; they have to be monsters. The tax bill has to be “ARMAGEDDON!” A Republican president can’t just be bad; George W. Bush and Donald Trump, two very different men, both have to be the next Hitler. The White House proposal on immigration reform can’t be merely flawed, it has to be “a white supremacist ransom note.”

Who in their right mind would want to be involved in politics when people react like this?

Read more at:http://www.nationalreview.com/jolt
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -2  
Mon 29 Jan, 2018 11:26 am
@oristarA,
The commie-ass Nation wrote:
When California fights back, it matters. With over 39 million people, it is the nation’s most populous state and the world’s sixth-largest economy, and it has thrived in large part thanks to the immigration that produced its ethnically diverse population. No other state in the Union comes as close to being a model of an alternative to the fearful future that Washington now offers.

America’s future arrives first in California, and that bodes ill for the president and his Republican enablers.

[California]up for sanctuary cities, filing a suit challenging a new Justice Department requirement that in order to qualify for certain federal crime-prevention funds, cities and counties (including sanctuary cities, of which California has dozens) must give jailhouse access to federal immigration agents and provide 48 hours’ notice before releasing any undocumented immigrants sought by the feds. Those conditions, in the words of the attorney general’s office, represent an “unconstitutional attempt to force California law enforcement officials to engage in federal immigration enforcement.”

It sued to stop Trump’s attempt to build a wall at the Mexican border, arguing that it violated federal environmental laws and the Constitution’s separation of powers by giving the president authority “to waive state and local laws.


Who knew that "filing a suit" that is going to be lost in court is "beating" someone, eh?


revelette1
 
  4  
Mon 29 Jan, 2018 11:27 am
@layman,
Pretty sure it is official, you ain't too good at comprehension.

Warner was speaking of the "dossier" has been neither proven or disproven. Mueller has been conducting his own probe, I doubt the dossier has been any part of it other than checking out the allegations. Mueller is not going to release findings which are in doubt or haven't been investigated and conclusions drawn. At this point, I don't know if allegations of collusions have proven or not. I don't think anyone will know until Mueller speaks; if he is allowed.
0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
oristarA
 
  0  
Mon 29 Jan, 2018 11:33 am
@layman,

layman wrote:

Obama and the FBI colluded to cover up his complicity with Clinton's crimes


What crimes? Have common sense: In dubio pro reo! Comey has made clear that he could neither prove nor disprove the guilty of Hillary. America has not yet abandoned the principle of presumption of innocence.
Below viewing threshold (view)
revelette1
 
  2  
Mon 29 Jan, 2018 11:58 am
FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe stepping down (NBC NEWS)

Well, I hope he has a tell all book coming out.
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Mon 29 Jan, 2018 12:04 pm
@georgeob1,
georgeob1 wrote:
... the fact that a large minority of Americans are found in a poll ...
It's a fact, not just in a poll, that a large minority elected Trump as president.


Sorry, but I couldn't resist
layman
 
  -4  
Mon 29 Jan, 2018 12:07 pm
@revelette1,
revelette1 wrote:

FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe stepping down (NBC NEWS)

Well, I hope he has a tell all book coming out.


He aint "stepping down." He done done it. He walked the plank with a sword at his back, ya know?

Quote:
FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe stepped down Monday, multiple sources familiar with the matter told NBC News.

McCabe will remain on the FBI payroll until he is eligible to retire with full benefits in mid-March, the sources said.


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/fbi-deputy-director-andrew-mccabe-stepping-down/ar-BBIplpl

So, he "quits" now but is staying on the government tit, eh? Figures, sho nuff. Whatta leech, eh?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.47 seconds on 12/27/2024 at 01:03:17