192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
layman
 
  -4  
Thu 4 Jan, 2018 12:38 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
The MSM has basically admitted that it had a calculated strategy with Trump. During the primaries they gave him preferential coverage. That was good for ratings, sure, but they also tried their best to help him win the primary because they wanted Hillary and were cocksure that Trump could NEVER beat her.

That's kinda like some cheese-eater loading and packing a gun that he's afraid of and doesn't know how to use. Then, when he panics in a threatening situation, and fumbles around trying to get it out to shoot it, his antagonist calmly takes it away from him and busts a cap in his sorry ass.

Nice try, cheese-eater.
0 Replies
 
wmwcjr
 
  1  
Thu 4 Jan, 2018 12:39 am
@layman,
But I like Blatham. I like Finn, too. With good will toward all, I say "good night."
layman
 
  -3  
Thu 4 Jan, 2018 12:43 am
@wmwcjr,
wmwcjr wrote:

But I like Blatham. I like Finn, too. With good will toward all, I say "good night."


Later, Bill.

BTW, there ya go, gettin personal again, eh?
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -2  
Thu 4 Jan, 2018 01:12 am
@layman,
Bannon's comeback response:

Quote:
Bannon appeared on Sirius XM’s Patriot Channel’s “Breitbart News Tonight” late Wednesday and called Trump a “great man.” When asked by a caller about Trump’s comments about him on Twitter, Bannon appeared to shake off Trump’s remarks.

“You know I support him day in and day out, whether going through the country giving the Trump miracle speech or on the show or on the website,” he said.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Thu 4 Jan, 2018 01:56 am
Anthony Zurcher's opinion piece on fall out between Hitler and Ernst Rohm.

Quote:
Donald Trump swept to the presidency in part on the back of Steve Bannon and his Breitbart conservative media empire. Now we will see how he fares when he's at war with them.

The president's blistering reply to Mr Bannon's comments appears to indicate that the bridge between the politician and his ideological spirit guide has been reduced to cinders. But how will Mr Trump's legion of supporters react? It is never wise to underestimate their dedication to the man himself, above all else.

No matter the outcome of this coming battle, this has to be viewed as a devastating failure for Mr Bannon personally. After spending years advocating for an anti-establishment conservative populism, he finally had a seat in the halls of power. He said in early 2017 that his goal was nothing short of the "deconstruction of the administrative state".

Now he is on the outside again, besieged by long-time antagonists and former allies. His president recently signed a tax bill embraced by corporate interests. His first post-2016 foray into elective politics, the Alabama Senate race, ended in humiliating defeat.

Perhaps, given all this, the Bannon-Trump feud was as inevitable as it is certain to be vicious.

Emails show Mr Trump Jr agreed to meet Russian associates in June 2016 on the premise that they had damaging information against his father's Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton. The meeting was also attended by Jared Kushner, the president's son-in-law and aide, and then campaign chairman Paul Manafort.

Mr Bannon reportedly told Mr Wolff that the three senior campaign officials "should have called the FBI immediately" after the meeting, according to US media reports.

The Senate, House of Representatives and a special counsel are all investigating alleged Russian interference in the presidential election and alleged attempts to undermine Mrs Clinton - a claim denied by the Kremlin. Mr Trump has also vehemently denied any collusion.

The book makes a series of other claims, including a suggestion that Mr Trump and his election campaign staff did actually not want to win the election.

It also alleges that former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair told Mr Trump during a meeting last February that the British intelligence services may have been spying on him and his campaign, according to a report in The Times newspaper.

In March the then-White House press secretary Sean Spicer told journalists UK intelligence services could have been involved in an alleged spying operation on Trump Tower in New York. GCHQ said the allegation was "nonsense".

The Times says Mr Blair was hoping to get a job advising Mr Trump on the Middle East. A spokeswoman for Mr Blair told The Times that the allegations were a "total fabrication" and said Mr Blair had not suggested himself as Mr Trump's Middle East envoy.

Mrs Sanders described the book as "filled with false and misleading accounts from individuals who have no access or influence with the White House".

"Participating in a book that can only be described as a trashy tabloid fiction exposes their sad desperate attempts at relevancy".


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-42560520
0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
Walter Hinteler
 
  5  
Thu 4 Jan, 2018 02:40 am
Updated: Do Russia probe attorneys’ donations to Democrats threaten their independence?
Quote:
[...]
The Pinocchio Test
It now turns out that nine members of Mueller’s team have made political donations to Democrats, compared to six with no record of such donations. Five of the 15 known members – Rhee, Quarles, Freeny, Prelogar and Atkinson – contributed to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign.

So this leaves the team more unbalanced than the 4-4 split we found last June. But we are going to reaffirm the Three-Pinocchio rating. Trump asserted that the people who had been hired were “all Hillary Clinton supporters” and that obviously is not the case.

Moreover, Trump said “some of them worked for Hillary Clinton.” But that is clearly wrong. Rhee, who donated the maximum amount to Clinton’s campaign, represented the Clinton Foundation in a 2015 lawsuit. Zebley, who made no political donations, represented a Clinton aide at one point. That’s not the same as working for Clinton.

In any case, the DOJ is legally barred from discriminating career appointees based on political affiliation. Mueller took action against Strzok when texts expressing anti-Trump sentiments were discovered. But he can’t inquire about political leanings before hiring.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  3  
Thu 4 Jan, 2018 05:00 am
From the BBC.

Quote:
10 explosive revelations from new Trump book

Donald Trump was "befuddled" by his election win, did not enjoy his inauguration and was scared of the White House, according to a new book.

Journalist Michael Wolff's Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House also purports to lift the lid on Ivanka Trump's secret presidential ambitions.

The book details Mr Trump's regard for media titan Rupert Murdoch, though the admiration was apparently not mutual.

Michael Wolff's book was reportedly based on more than 200 interviews.

But White House press secretary Sarah Sanders said the book was filled with "false and misleading accounts".

The author says he was able to take up "something like a semi-permanent seat on a couch in the West Wing" following the president's inauguration for a close-up insight into the administration.

Here are 10 of the book's revelations, with commentary from the BBC's Anthony Zurcher.

1. Bannon thought Don Jr meeting 'treasonous'

According to the book, former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon thought a meeting between Donald Trump Jr and a group of Russians was "treasonous".

The Russians had offered Donald Trump Jr damaging information on Hillary Clinton at the June 2016 meeting.
Wolff writes that Bannon told him of the meeting:

"The three senior guys in the campaign thought it was a good idea to meet with a foreign government inside Trump Tower in the conference room on the 25th floor - with no lawyers. They didn't have any lawyers. Even if you thought that this was not treasonous, or unpatriotic, or bad s***, and I happen to think it's all of that, you should have called the FBI immediately."

Bannon reportedly said the Justice Department investigation into links between the Trump campaign and Moscow would focus on money laundering, adding: "They're going to crack Don Junior like an egg on national TV."

Anthony Zurcher: In just a few sentences, Bannon manages to detonate a bomb under the White House's efforts to downplay the significance of that fateful June meeting in Trump Tower and their attempt to dismiss Robert Mueller's inquiry as a partisan witchhunt. It's bad, Bannon is saying, and even more unforgivably it was stupid. Taking aim at Mr Trump's own family in the most personal terms makes it all the more biting.

2. Trump 'befuddled' by his victory

In an article for NYMag adapted from his book, Wolff describes the amazement - and dismay - in the Trump camp at his November 2016 election win.

"Shortly after 8pm on Election Night, when the unexpected trend - Trump might actually win - seemed confirmed, Don Jr told a friend that his father, or DJT, as he calls him, looked as if he had seen a ghost. Melania was in tears - and not of joy. There was, in the space of little more than an hour, in Steve Bannon's not unamused observation, a befuddled Trump morphing into a disbelieving Trump and then into a horrified Trump. But still to come was the final transformation: Suddenly, Donald Trump became a man who believed that he deserved to be, and was wholly capable of being, the president of the United States."

AZ: This is decidedly different from what has been recited by the Trump circle since election night. While campaign hands - at least the less-than-dedicated ones - may have been positioning themselves for a soft landing after a defeat, Mr Trump and his close allies believed in their success. A "horrified Trump" was never part of the script.

3. Trump 'angry' at inauguration

Wolff writes:

"Trump did not enjoy his own inauguration. He was angry that A-level stars had snubbed the event, disgruntled with the accommodations at Blair House, and visibly fighting with his wife, who seemed on the verge of tears. Throughout the day, he wore what some around him had taken to calling his golf face: angry and pissed off, shoulders hunched, arms swinging, brow furled, lips pursed."

But the first lady's office rejected the claims.

Communications director Stephanie Grisham said in a statement: "Mrs Trump supported her husband's decision to run for President and in fact, encouraged him to do so. She was confident he would win and was very happy when he did."

AZ: These words tell the same story as the viral video clip of a stone-faced Melania forcing a smile when the president looks her way. It also explains why Mr Trump was so insistent about the success of his inauguration and the size of his crowds. He felt slighted and aggrieved and was acting accordingly.

4. Trump found White House 'scary'

Wolff writes:

"Trump, in fact, found the White House to be vexing and even a little scary. He retreated to his own bedroom - the first time since the Kennedy White House that a presidential couple had maintained separate rooms. In the first days, he ordered two television screens in addition to the one already there, and a lock on the door, precipitating a brief standoff with the Secret Service, who insisted they have access to the room."

AZ: For much of his adult life, Mr Trump has lived according to his own rules, as a real-estate tycoon whose wealth allowed his every whim or idiosyncrasy to be accommodated. Adjusting to the White House - which Bill Clinton once referred to as the "crown jewel of the federal penitentiary system" and Harry Truman called "the great white jail" - must have been quite a shock.

5. Ivanka hopes to be president

Mr Trump's daughter and her husband Jared Kushner allegedly struck a deal that she might run for president in future, according to Wolff:

"Balancing risk against reward, both Jared and Ivanka decided to accept roles in the West Wing over the advice of almost everyone they knew. It was a joint decision by the couple, and, in some sense, a joint job. Between themselves, the two had made an earnest deal: If sometime in the future the opportunity arose, she'd be the one to run for president. The first woman president, Ivanka entertained, would not be Hillary Clinton; it would be Ivanka Trump. Bannon, who had coined the term 'Jarvanka' that was now in ever greater use in the White House, was horrified when the couple's deal was reported to him."

AZ: The feud between Bannon and "Jarvanka" was no secret, and it certainly wasn't surprising. In a way, the couple represented to Bannon everything he's fighting against - East Coast elitism and entitlement. Yet, thanks to familial ties, they had the president's ear and - this new book claims - harboured dynastic hopes.

6. Ivanka mocks dad's 'comb-over'

The US first daughter poked fun at her father's alleged "scalp-reduction surgery", according to the book.

"She treated her father with a degree of detachment, even irony, going so far as to make fun of his comb-over to others. She often described the mechanics behind it to friends: an absolutely clean pate - a contained island after scalp-reduction -surgery - surrounded by a furry circle of hair around the sides and front, from which all ends are drawn up to meet in the center and then swept back and secured by a stiffening spray. The color, she would point out to comical effect, was from a product called Just for Men - the longer it was left on, the darker it got. Impatience resulted in Trump's orange-blond hair color."

AZ: It wouldn't be particularly surprising if this is one of the anecdotes that Mr Trump finds most irksome. The president is proud of his hair, and once notably let late-night host Jimmy Fallon ruffle it to establish its authenticity. On windy days, Mr Trump usually wears a hat - the origin of the Make America Great Again ball cap - to ensure there are no coiffing malfunctions. The hair is as much a part of the Trump brand as big hotels and gold-plated escalators.

7. White House unsure of priorities

Katie Walsh, the White House deputy chief of staff, asked Mr Kushner, the president's senior adviser, what the administration wanted to achieve.

But according to the book, Mr Kushner did not have an answer.

"'Just give me the three things the president wants to focus on,' she [Katie Walsh] demanded. 'What are the three priorities of this White House?' It was the most basic question imaginable - one that any qualified presidential candidate would have answered long before he took up residence at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Six weeks into Trump's presidency, Kushner was wholly without an answer. 'Yes,' he said to Walsh. 'We should probably have that conversation.'"

AZ: It often takes a new administration a bit of time to find its footing. In Mr Trump's case, the situation was particularly acute. Having campaigned on some clear policy items - strengthened borders, renegotiated trade deals, a sweeping tax cut and Obamacare repeal - prioritising was clearly a challenge. Once in the White House, he allowed Congress to kick off with healthcare reform, and the difficulties achieving that goal haunted the Trump presidency for nearly a year.

8. Trump's admiration for Murdoch

Wolff, who previously wrote a biography of Rupert Murdoch, describes Mr Trump's high regard for the News Corp media titan.

"Rupert Murdoch, who had promised to pay a call on the president-elect, was running late. When some of the guests made a move to leave, an increasingly agitated Trump assured them that Rupert was on his way. 'He's one of the greats, the last of the greats,' Trump said. 'You have to stay to see him.' Not grasping that he was now the most powerful man in the world, Trump was still trying mightily to curry favor with a media mogul who had long disdained him as a charlatan and fool."

AZ: During the campaign, Mr Trump had at times feuded with Murdoch's Fox News - fighting with presenter Megyn Kelly, boycotting the network and skipping a Fox-broadcast primary debate. The president, however, is one of Fox News' biggest fans - and the network has become his greatest advocate since his inauguration.

9. Murdoch calls Trump 'idiot'

But the admiration was not mutual, according to Wolff's account of a call between Mr Murdoch and Mr Trump about the president's meeting with Silicon Valley executives.

Mr Trump is said to have told Mr Murdoch:

"'These guys really need my help. Obama was not very favorable to them, too much regulation. This is really an opportunity for me to help them.' 'Donald,' said Murdoch, 'for eight years these guys had Obama in their pocket. They practically ran the administration. They don't need your help.'

'Take this H-1B visa issue. They really need these H-1B visas.'Murdoch suggested that taking a liberal approach to H-1B visas, which open America's doors to select immigrants, might be hard to square with his promises to build a wall and close the borders. But Trump seemed unconcerned, assuring Murdoch, 'We'll figure it out.' 'What a f****** idiot,' said Murdoch, shrugging, as he got off the phone."


AZ: There's sometimes been a disconnect between Mr Trump's anti-immigration rhetoric and his action as a businessman, where his companies often relied on immigrant labour. Perhaps the president-elect was reflecting his business sensibilities. Or maybe, in this case, he was simply echoing the opinion of the last group of people who had met with him - a criticism that has been lobbed his way on more than one occasion.

10. Flynn knew Russia ties 'a problem'

Former US National Security Adviser Mike Flynn knew that accepting money from Moscow for a speech could come back to haunt him, according to the book.

Wolff writes that before the election Mr Flynn "had been told by friends that it had not been a good idea to take $45,000 from the Russians for a speech. 'Well it would only be a problem if we won,' he assured them."

Mr Flynn has been indicted in the Justice Department special counsel's inquiry.

AZ: Like Paul Manafort, Flynn was one of the members of the Trump campaign's inner circle whose prior affairs were not ordered in a way that would, shall we say, stand up to close legal scrutiny. If Mr Trump had been defeated, that probably wouldn't have mattered. Like the protaganists in the film The Producers, however, their success was their undoing.



http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-42559436
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  5  
Thu 4 Jan, 2018 05:36 am
https://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.snopes.com%2Fwordpress%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2016%2F08%2Fa24.jpg&f=1

https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.breitbart.com%2Fmedia%2F2015%2F01%2Fmichael_moore.jpg&f=1

I'd like to see these two guys armed with 2x4's and locked in mortal combat at the end of a steel pier.
maporsche
 
  3  
Thu 4 Jan, 2018 05:57 am
@wmwcjr,
Finn and Blathem have developed a very close relationship on this board, mostly Finn though.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  4  
Thu 4 Jan, 2018 06:06 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
Finn wrote:
It's also precisely what so many Democrats and liberals were absolutely certain Trump taking center stage would accomplish, and all he managed to do was win the White House.

I don't quite understand the seriousness of your response, fairly dripping with disgust, to what seemed like an offhand comment by blatham.

Be that as it may, I think you're missing a big part of the reason for Trump's unexpected victory — his opponent was dropping in the polls and had a negative approval rating close to his own. Establishment Democrats were so used to HRC they never detected her real level of unpopularity. They were thinking of her as someone with the comfort level of a Joe Biden, unaware that she actually made peoples' skin crawl. So I think drawing cautionary lessons from Trump's victory is useful but as long as Dems field a solid candidate, defeating Wacky Bachman shouldn't pose much of a problem. And, like Palin, she'd be sure to generate a lot of negative publicity and embarrass thinking conservatives everywhere.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  5  
Thu 4 Jan, 2018 06:29 am
Wow, another stunning success story!

Quote:
President Trump on Wednesday abruptly shut down a White House commission he had charged with investigating voter fraud, ending a brief quest for evidence of election theft that generated lawsuits, outrage and some scholarly testimony, but no real evidence that American elections are corrupt.

NYT

The first the members of the commission heard about it was on the news.
revelette1
 
  4  
Thu 4 Jan, 2018 07:38 am
Eric Trump suggests that DeGeneres is part of the 'Deep State' (Entertainment Weekly)

Quote:
Eric Trump is finding that Twitter’s recommendations of who he “should” follow are getting suspicious. In his latest suggested round-up, the first son was presented with three options: former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former U.S. President Barack Obama, and talk show host Ellen DeGeneres.

“Shocking,” Trump tweeted with a screenshot of the suggestions. “Once again, here are the @Twitter ‘suggestions’ of who I should follow. #DeepState.”


The apple does not fall from the tree.

Quote:
Stephen Colbert wasn’t the only late-night television host concerned about President Donald Trump‘s tweet about the “nuclear button.” The host of Jimmy Kimmel Live called POTUS one of “two maniacs with nuclear warheads” when discussing Trump’s latest series of tweets on Tuesday.

On New Year’s Day, North Korean President Kim Jong-un gave a speech in which he said (via The New York Times), “It’s not a mere threat but a reality that I have a nuclear button on the desk in my office. All of the mainland United States is within the range of our nuclear strike.”

In response, Trump tweeted, “North Korean Leader Kim Jong Un just stated that the ‘Nuclear Button is on his desk at all times.’ Will someone from his depleted and food starved regime please inform him that I too have a Nuclear Button, but it is a much bigger & more powerful one than his, and my Button works!”

North Korean Leader Kim Jong Un just stated that the “Nuclear Button is on his desk at all times.” Will someone from his depleted and food starved regime please inform him that I too have a Nuclear Button, but it is a much bigger & more powerful one than his, and my Button works!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 3, 2018



EW
blatham
 
  4  
Thu 4 Jan, 2018 08:43 am
@ehBeth,
Quote:
Until #45 and his squad started responding, that book could have sunk nicely.
But Trump clearly cannot control his responses when he feels slighted or betrayed. Attack! is what he knows. Loud, public bullying.

The Breitbard/Fox contest for audience (and the big money attached) is possibly the most interesting element. I'm not sure how another bifurcation on the right is avoided.
blatham
 
  2  
Thu 4 Jan, 2018 08:48 am
@BillW,
Quote:
tRump lawyers send Bannon a letter of a 'Cease and Desist' order
I can't imagine that a confidentiality agreement has power in this setting (political operations of the WH/President). If Bannon was working for Trump Inc, that would something else. I'm sure someone will write on this point today.
Below viewing threshold (view)
blatham
 
  5  
Thu 4 Jan, 2018 08:54 am
@wmwcjr,
Quote:
It sure gets personal around here. Sad!
One doesn't have to respond to that stuff.
Below viewing threshold (view)
revelette1
 
  3  
Thu 4 Jan, 2018 09:15 am
@blatham,
The lawyers didn't stop there:

Trump lawyer seeks to block insider book on White House (WP)

Where do they imagine they live at? China or Russia? I imagine the Clinton's wished they had such powers to just stop books from being published about them when they were in the WH.

Why didn't they go to courts? Surely they can't just demand a book from being put out and sold?
blatham
 
  3  
Thu 4 Jan, 2018 09:19 am
@hightor,
Quote:
President Trump on Wednesday abruptly shut down a White House commission he had charged with investigating voter fraud
That's the most surprising decision I've seen in a while. There's some piece to this story we don't know yet.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.44 seconds on 04/27/2024 at 02:25:17