@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Try telling a 14 year old's mom that he'd take care of her while the mom is in court, then driving the girl back to his house, getting her drunk, and sexually assaulting her.
You can't even get the unproven allegations right, eh? According to Time (and all others I've seen):
Time wrote: The allegations: Leigh Corfman told the Washington Post that she met Moore in 1979 when she was just 14 years old. The then-district attorney offered to watch Corfman while her mother attended a custody hearing, she said, and he asked for her phone number when he was alone with her. Corfman said that days later, Moore drove her to his house and kissed her. During a second encounter, he allegedly took off her shirt and pants and touched her over her underwear and led her hands to touch him over his underwear. “I wanted it over with,” Corfman told the Post.
Moore’s response: “It never happened,” Moore said during an interview with Sean Hannity. “I don’t know Miss Corfman from anybody. I never talked to or never had any contact with her. Allegations of sexual misconduct with her are completely false. I believe they’re politically motivated.
http://time.com/5029172/roy-moore-accusers/
He "then" got her phone number, the claim is, not "then driving the girl back to his house."
On a different day, he allegedly kissed her.
On yet a third day, he allegedly had some sexual interaction with her.
There is no allegation whatsoever that he "got her drunk."
These are minor details, granted, but your know it all attitude is completely unwarranted.
Furthermore, Lash only addressed what you (don't) know about what Moore DID, not about what allegations were made by one person. Implicitly, you are asserting that you know he did the things alleged.