monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

Not to mention that the crime is "statutory rape," not child molestion, eh? A rapist is not, ispo facto, a child molester.

Quote:

In the state of Alabama, child molestation is defined as any type of intercourse or sexual contact with a person under the age of 12.

https://www.sexcrimesdefensealabama.com/child-molestation.html

I am over 15. But, if I wasn't, I would never accuse some 20 year old BABE of "raping" me if she would just put out, know what I'm sayin?

Rep. John Lewis announced that he would not be attending the opening of the Mississippi Civil Rights Museum over the weekend, because President Donald Trump will be there.

Lewis said that Trump’s “attendance and hurtful policies are an insult to the people portrayed” by the museum itself.

“After careful consideration and conversations with church leaders, elected officials, civil rights activists, and many citizens of our congressional districts, we have decided not to attend or participate in the opening of the Mississippi Civil Rights Museum,” Lewis said in a statement.

In particular, Lewis pointed to the president’s “disparaging comments about women, the disabled, immigrants, and National Football League players.”

“The struggles represented in this museum exemplify the truth of what really happened in Mississippi,” he said. “After President Trump departs, we encourage all Mississippians and Americans to visit this historic civil rights museum.”

This is a particularly damning decision and statement from Lewis, considering the fact that he is a hero to the civil rights movement.

Lewis is not the only one to express concerns over Trump attending the museum opening, either. The NAACP has also said that it does not want Trump there.

“President Trump’s statements and policies regarding the protection and enforcement of civil rights have been abysmal, and his attendance is an affront to the veterans of the civil rights movement,” Derrick Johnson, NAACP president and CEO, said in a statement. “He has created a commission to reinforce voter suppression, refused to denounce white supremacists, and overall, has created a racially hostile climate in this nation.”

Rep. Bennie Thompson of Mississippi also announced that he would not be speaking at the event if Trump was there.

“The civil rights marchers who are being honored would turn over in their grave knowing that somebody who’s stood for that stuff would be in attendance,” Thompson told the Boston Globe. “The question is, do I want to be associated with someone who is that narrow in focus.”

I'm glad the girl enjoyed herself. Not surprisingly you either completely missed or have just chosen to ignore the substance of the article and have simply thrown out a red herring.

The problem here is that Allred trots this entry out as though it proves her case, which it obviously doesn't.

I'll acknowledge that she is not admitting that his actual signature was forged, but, again, that's doesn't establish anything improper.

What we’re looking at isn’t a grand conspiracy of forgeries against an innocent man. It’s a note, written by one woman, marking the date and place of an inscription that looks just like Moore’s writing to another woman a few years later. In each case, Moore now denies he met or knew the woman. So either he’s lying, or both of the samples are forgeries, which would require the world’s most amazing combination of conspiratorial genius (getting access to old books in two different states) and conspiratorial incompetence (forging an inscription with redundant words in two different styles). And Moore and his attorney would have to be in on the conspiracy, faking private suspicions—through the words tampering and everything—that the inscription was authentic.

Someone made an entry into her yearbook and signed Moore's name to it.

Roy Moore accuser alters part of her account about inscription

Allred said Friday that Moore did not write several notes at the end of the inscription....In her initial statement, Nelson said that Moore had written the entire inscription in her yearbook. “He wrote in my yearbook as follows,” Nelson said. “ ‘To a sweeter and more beautiful girl I could not say Merry Christmas. Christmas 1977. Love Roy Moore, Olde Hickory House.’ And he signed it ‘Roy Moore D.A.’

In recent weeks, Moore has said of his accusers, “I did not know any of them.” This contradicts an interview Moore gave with Sean Hannity on Nov. 10, in which Moore said he knew two of the accusers when they were teenagers. He told Hannity that he did not remember dating girls between the ages of 16 and 18, but could not rule it out.

“I don’t remember dating any girl without the permission of her mother,” Moore said.

Nelson is willing to testify under oath. A courtroom would be a better place to establish the relevant facts of this case.

And this is only one accuser; what about the other five?

In recent weeks, Moore has said of his accusers, “I did not know any of them.” This contradicts an interview Moore gave with Sean Hannity on Nov. 10, in which Moore said he knew two of the accusers when they were teenagers. He told Hannity that he did not remember dating girls between the ages of 16 and 18, but could not rule it out.

“I don’t remember dating any girl without the permission of her mother,” Moore said.

He told Hannity that he did not remember dating girls between the ages of 16 and 18, but could not rule it out.

Moore should be in jail, for many different reasons, along with tRump.

Quote:

Someone made an entry into her yearbook and signed Moore's name to it.

Yeah, a skilled forger who knew exactly what Moore's signature looked like.

"Essay #4 called for a comparison between a novel and a film. You chose to compare "Easy Rider" and "Metamorphosis." I really enjoyed your essay and would have given you full points except for your one big mistake. "Metamorphosis" is a novella!"