192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
Olivier5
 
  2  
Wed 6 Dec, 2017 10:09 am
@layman,
Hi Layboy. You might wish to read this:

Quote:
Eating Cheese Every Day May Actually Be Good for You

By AMANDA MACMILLAN
December 5, 2017, TIME Health

Cheese is typically considered more of an indulgence than a health food, but a new review of research suggests that it may not be as bad for you as once thought. In fact, people in the analysis who ate a little bit of cheese every day were less likely to develop heart disease or have a stroke, compared to those who rarely or never ate cheese.
ehBeth
 
  3  
Wed 6 Dec, 2017 10:11 am
@revelette1,
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -3  
Wed 6 Dec, 2017 10:14 am
@Olivier5,
Olivier5 wrote:

Hi Layboy. You might wish to read this:

Quote:
Eating Cheese Every Day May Actually Be Good for You

Cheese is typically considered more of an indulgence than a health food, but a new review of research suggests that it may not be as bad for you as once thought. In fact, people in the analysis who ate a little bit of cheese every day were less likely to develop heart disease or have a stroke, compared to those who rarely or never ate cheese.



The old standby "correlation equals causation" fallacy that you embrace so unwittingly is supposed to be of interest to me?

I don't think so! Homey don't play dat.

That aside, I would rather die of of a heart attack that eat filthy cheese, know what I'm sayin?
Olivier5
 
  2  
Wed 6 Dec, 2017 10:15 am
@layman,
I'd rather have a heart attack rather than forego cheese...
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Wed 6 Dec, 2017 10:19 am
@izzythepush,
I do realize religion underpins that regional conflict, but more recently, Russia has made moves to partner with Iran to counter the US/Saudi oil/currency partnership—hence the US/Russian proxy war in Syria.

You probably knew.

Editing to add that this theory isn’t universally accepted.
izzythepush
 
  3  
Wed 6 Dec, 2017 10:28 am
@Lash,
US Russia maybe, but not Sunni/Shia Arab Persian.

Yemen doesn't have any oil but that doesn't stop it being a bloody warzone. Iran and Saudi Arabia have been fighting a proxy war for years all over the ME.

Russia is more interested in protecting its military assets in Syria than partnering with Iran to counter Saudi oil dominance. The Russians have got plenty of oil of their own.
0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
Lash
 
  1  
Wed 6 Dec, 2017 10:35 am
@layman,
That’s definitely one way to look at it.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -3  
Wed 6 Dec, 2017 10:45 am
@layman,
layman wrote:


Contrast Flynn. The FBI knew every word Flynn said to the Russian Ambassador--they had listened in on every conversation. So why was there a "need" to interview him? There wasn't. They didn't interview him to gather information. They did it to set him up for a criminal charge (for doing something completely legal, no less) and "destroy his life," as Trump put it.


Those FISA-related wire taps were immediately and feloniously leaked to the press. Gee, I wonder what FBI agent might have done that, eh? Easy to violate the law when you have advance assurances that your felonies will not be prosecuted by the FBI, eh?
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  2  
Wed 6 Dec, 2017 10:49 am
Theories abound.

I’m watching Russia and Iran for a growing alliance.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/theconversation.com/amp/russia-and-irans-growing-cooperation-hints-at-a-new-middle-east-75181

An excerpt:

A New Middle East Driven by Russia?

Above and beyond a circumstantial deepening of ties arising from the emergence of a new Middle East, Russian military presence in Syria has led these two countries into a new military alliance against Sunni jihadists. But the Russian military intervention in Syria also represents a challenge to Iranian military doctrine on regional security.

Since Iran’s 1979 Islamic revolution, which created a government centred around a religious power, Tehran has insisted on the need for Western Asian countries (the Iranian name for the Middle East) to reject all military interference from powers outside the region.

Iranian diplomats often make a distinction between so-called independent states, such as Iran, Russia and China, and those subservient to the United States, such as the oil-rich kingdoms of the Persian Gulf. Russian military intervention in Syria then constitutes a challenge to Iran, which opposes the international system dominated by major powers.

When Russia revealed in August 2016 that its armed forces had used the Noje airbase, just outside Hamadan in Iran, it provoked a controversy in the Islamic Republic as the country’s constitution prohibits the establishment of military bases on Iranian soil by foreign powers.

The chairman of the Iranian parliament, Ali Larijani, specified that the Russian air force only used the base temporarily, in order to bomb “terrorists” in Syria.

Despite the inherent limits of an asymmetrical partnership between a world power and a regional one, the Iranian political elite must be given their due for transforming the old Russian enemy into a partner, a feat which the Iranian communists from the Tudeh party failed to achieve in the time between the end of the second world war and their exit from the Iranian political stage in 1983.

0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  3  
Wed 6 Dec, 2017 10:55 am
FYI: Oil, currency, casus belli

https://www.telesurtv.net/english/opinion/What-Does-the-Sale-of-Venezuelan-Oil-in-Currencies-Other-Than-the-US-Dollar-Mean-20170916-0014.html

https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/6245914

^Pretty strong reasons for Iran/Russian alliance.


0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  6  
Wed 6 Dec, 2017 11:02 am
Another woman has come forward to accuse Al Franklin of forcibly trying to kissing her. I am coming to agree, Al Franklin should resign, these stories are starting to form a pattern of behavior of which his apologies and excuses fall flat. However, this latest one, he denies.
Lash
 
  -1  
Wed 6 Dec, 2017 11:06 am
Btw, thank god some democrat chicks are finally doing the right thing and calling for the ouster of Al Franken.

Good political move for the 2020-ordained Harris.
Coincidentally, the right thing to do.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.nytimes.com/2017/12/06/us/politics/franken-harrassment-resign.amp.html
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  4  
Wed 6 Dec, 2017 11:08 am
@layman,
Pro-tip #2: Deutsche Bank in all likelihood is not legally allowed to reveal to the subject of an investigation that they've answered a subpoena of records. When prosecutors issue subpoenas to companies, this is a common thing to prevent the company from doing.

So, when the WH says that they didn't do it: that doesn't mean ****. Not that anyone would ever believe a word they say, in any event, because they lie constantly about everything.

Cycloptichorn
Olivier5
 
  2  
Wed 6 Dec, 2017 11:09 am
The sunni have hated the shia since Ali and Hussein, and vice versa. They both see this shia-sunni conflict as existential, absolutely central to their world view and historic destinies. It's not going away anytime soon.

Nowadays some of the shia minorities in Gulf states try to free themselves of their second class citizen status, including in Yemen. They dare to exist, to speak up, to fight back, and this is anathema for their sunni monarchs.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -3  
Wed 6 Dec, 2017 11:13 am
@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote:

Pro-tip #2: Deutsche Bank in all likelihood is not legally allowed to reveal to the subject of an investigation that they've answered a subpoena of records. When prosecutors issue subpoenas to companies, this is a common thing to prevent the company from doing.
Cycloptichorn


Anyone served with a subpoena for records is allowed (and the cases of banks, even required) to challenge the subpooena in open court.

Pro-tip #2, "not legally allowed," eh? Nice try, cheese-eater. Reality is not just whatever **** you make up on the spot because you want it to be true. Try again.
Cycloptichorn
 
  5  
Wed 6 Dec, 2017 11:17 am
@layman,
layman wrote:

Cycloptichorn wrote:

Pro-tip #2: Deutsche Bank in all likelihood is not legally allowed to reveal to the subject of an investigation that they've answered a subpoena of records. When prosecutors issue subpoenas to companies, this is a common thing to prevent the company from doing.
Cycloptichorn


Anyone served with a subpoena for records is allowed (and the cases of banks, even required) to challenge the subpooena in open court.


You don't know the first thing about what you're talking about, man. Prosecutors both can and do include secrecy clauses in subpoenas and you can be tried for violating them.

Why even bother commenting? Makes this **** pretty amusing. Why don't you just go troll somewhere else? The constant insults you sling are boring and inane, and add nothing to the conversation

Cycloptichorn
layman
 
  -4  
Wed 6 Dec, 2017 11:20 am
@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote:

You don't know the first thing about what you're talking about, man. Prosecutors both can and do include secrecy clauses in subpoenas and you can be tried for violating them.


Only in the proto-facist left-wing world you create in your imagination, cheese-eater. Sorry, but the leftists have not yet succeeded in abolishing due process of law. Dream on.
Lash
 
  1  
Wed 6 Dec, 2017 11:22 am
@revelette1,
Watch out! You’re stepping out from under the establishment umbrella of acceptable opinions!!

Somebody’s going to school you by PM within five minutes.

Women should be abused and not heard—or something like that.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  3  
Wed 6 Dec, 2017 11:25 am
@layman,
Maybe you should Google 'FBI Secret Subpoena' for a plethora of examples of when the FBI has done, yeah. Exactly what I said.

If secret subpoenas didn't exist, Warrant Canaries wouldn't need to exist either. But they do.

Like I said, you literally have no knowledge on this subject at all. Isn't that the truth?

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.43 seconds on 05/02/2024 at 10:58:11