@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:...suddenly we have to worry about women going too far when all that happened was that they were made "uncomfortable."
Are you suggesting that any man accused by a woman of making her "uncomfortable" should face prosecution or condemnation? That seems overly broad and prejudicial.
As for your roster of rogues:
Denied guilt; paid off accusers; lost their jobs; many witnesses and complainants
Guilt undetermined at this time, denies any wrongdoing; anecdotal evidence of a pattern of behavior, many witnesses and complainants
Innocent; victim fabricated story; not politicians
(echoes of the Tawana Brawley case)
Paid off accuser, proven pattern of behavior, suspected of rape or assault but not formally charged
Photo evidence of guilt, proven pattern of behavior
Assumed guilty; settled with accuser
(as far as I know — haven't really studied this one)
Admits physical contact; accuser preserves anonymity; not much else known; not a politician
The innocent were found innocent, the others are indicted to the degree that the truth of the charges and extent of the damage can be established. I don't "unequivocally condemn" anyone based on hearsay, not even Moore. Not until they confess or are found guilty in a court of law. I suspect that Moore and Clinton are guilty of serious charges but will probably not face justice. I know that Franken is guilty of at least one of the charges, for which he deserves to be admonished and personally ashamed but honestly, I don't think it amounts to being an actual "crime". This is where you and Lash can yell "Gotcha!"
I don't see anyone defending the non-politicians Lauer or Weinstein — do they belong to any particular "tribe"? The alt right would have us think so. At least Joe Barton had the decency to announce that he won't seek re-election. How come George H.W. Bush never even gets a mention?