192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
blatham
 
  5  
Sat 25 Nov, 2017 06:51 am
It's difficult for me to state just how much I love this idea.
Quote:
David Frum‏Verified account
@davidfrum
Time should give it to Hillary, just to mess with him
blatham
 
  4  
Sat 25 Nov, 2017 06:53 am
Here's one hell of a good question.
In revisiting sexual harassment claims, where is the conversation on Clarence Thomas?
hightor
 
  3  
Sat 25 Nov, 2017 06:59 am
@blatham,
Well, oralloy said she was nothing but a liar so I guess that's the end of the story.

I've noticed that Bill O'Reilly doesn't get mentioned much either.
Lash
 
  0  
Sat 25 Nov, 2017 07:03 am
The charge against Clarence Thomas was thoroughly investigated on TV for a week. Nothing was left to chance. I still look for pubes on coke can tops.

Bill Clinton’s rapes were hushed up. Do you really not see the difference?
blatham
 
  3  
Sat 25 Nov, 2017 07:04 am
From ProPublica
Quote:
Koch Lobbyists and Opus Dei — Who’s Dropping in on Trump Budget Czar Mick Mulvaney?
The influential OMB director’s door is open to corporate and conservative interests, according to logs that the White House fought to keep secret.

One of President Donald Trump’s top cabinet officials has met with a long list of lobbyists, corporate executives and wealthy people with business interests before the government, according to calendars the Trump administration fought to keep secret.

The calendars for Mick Mulvaney, the former South Carolina congressman who now runs the White House Office of Management and Budget, offer a glimpse of who has access to the highest levels of the Trump administration.

Among those visiting Mulvaney: Trump friend and casino magnate Steve Wynn; a flurry of officials from the conservative Heritage Foundation; a string of health care and Wall Street CEOs; lobbyists for Koch Industries; a cryptocurrency evangelist; and a prominent member of the Catholic group Opus Dei.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  4  
Sat 25 Nov, 2017 07:08 am
@blatham,
Quote:
Does anyone have a good take on why Tillerson seems hell-bent on de-stabilizing and disempowering the working of the State Department?

Some good theories in the comments section.

I always got the feeling that, as with the intelligence community, the hard right never trusted the State Department. The idea that there were professionals in charge, people who suppressed any personal ideology in service of their greater duty to the country really upset them. Perhaps there's a twinge of jealousy as well. Hard to accept that some factotum might actually be better informed than a real estate developer or a CEO in the fossil fuel industry. There's also that paranoia about the "deep state" — which, incidentally, we don't hear mentioned that much anymore.
hightor
 
  5  
Sat 25 Nov, 2017 07:10 am
@Lash,
Quote:
Do you really not see the difference?

We're perfectly aware of the difference.

Anita Hill's story was disbelieved by most people at the time. Do you really not see the similarity?
blatham
 
  3  
Sat 25 Nov, 2017 07:13 am
Let us please note that neither Louis CK nor Al Franken nor John Lasseter have attacked the women who have complained about their sexual behavior.
Builder
 
  -1  
Sat 25 Nov, 2017 07:21 am
@snood,
Quote:
Please tell me - are you proud of this president?


You don't read anything here apart from you own posts?
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  0  
Sat 25 Nov, 2017 07:22 am
@hightor,
It was - and is - curious when accusers show up 20, 30, 40 years later, followed confidently by partisans with an agenda. Thomas was the first time it’d happened, splayed across the national stage, so people were naturally suspicious.

It’s old hat now. We’ve devised a mechanism. Give the benefit of the doubt to the accuser unless/until she’s disproven.

Hope Clinton’s trial is soon. 🙂

0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  -2  
Sat 25 Nov, 2017 07:22 am
@blatham,
Quote:
Apparently, while in prayer, God contacted Donald Trump and advised that Trump would probably be the Messiah.


Do you still believe in a sky pixie?
0 Replies
 
oristarA
 
  0  
Sat 25 Nov, 2017 07:24 am
Do you guys remember Trump said that he would not be accepting the $400,000 annual salary if he became president?

Now President Trump has already taken more than 81 million dollars from our taxpayers in less than a year in the Oval Office. "Good job," Mr President, huh? :

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DPcXFgRUIAErs4z.jpg
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  2  
Sat 25 Nov, 2017 07:35 am
@hightor,
Quote:
I've noticed that Bill O'Reilly doesn't get mentioned much either.
Or Ailes. But that's the current situation as both certainly were covered well previously.

I'm a serious fan of the #MeToo movement but at the same time it makes me very anxious. That's because we know that in this modern political world in the US, it is going to weaponized for political gain.

I'm also anxious about it for another reason. Some of you may be familiar with the "recovered memory syndrome" movement that began with the publication of The Courage to Heal. And if you are familiar with this bit of history (and particularly if you're familiar with Frederick Crews writing on this at the New York Review f Books or elsewhere) you'll grasp how people, encouraged, can come to believe a past that never happened.
blatham
 
  2  
Sat 25 Nov, 2017 07:41 am
@hightor,
Quote:
Some good theories in the comments section.
It was good to be reminded of the prior relationship between Tillerson and Putin, which seems to be all about petroleum and profit with perhaps some shared affinity for authoritarian control. And also, to be reminded that sheer incompetence can be mistaken for planning and schemes.
Quote:
Hard to accept that some factotum might actually be better informed than a real estate developer or a CEO in the fossil fuel industry.
I think you're definitely on to something there. This administration is a dangerously perfect example of that thing.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Sat 25 Nov, 2017 07:52 am
@hightor,
She wrote
Quote:
The charge against Clarence Thomas was thoroughly investigated on TV for a week. Nothing was left to chance.

For a week. A full week. That's exactly the same time frame as Clinton being investigated for sexual misbehavior. This began before his arrival in DC and continues to the present - which is one week if I'm not mistaken.
blatham
 
  3  
Sat 25 Nov, 2017 08:01 am
And meanwhile, back at the ranch...
Quote:
For more than five hours, Attorney General Jeff Sessions sat in a hearing room on Capitol Hill this month, fending off inquiries on Washington’s two favorite topics: President Trump and Russia.

But legislators spent little time asking Sessions about the dramatic and controversial changes in policy he has made since taking over the top law enforcement job in the United States nine months ago.
WP
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Sat 25 Nov, 2017 08:11 am
Today's edition of Voices From The Right
Quote:
Former RNC chairman Michael Steele (@MichaelSteele) joins us for a live conversation from the Texas Tribune Festival in Austin, Tx. We discuss why Steele no longer recognizes the Republican party [10:00], whether he sees Trump as an existential threat to American democracy [43:00], and why those three words “We The People” mean so much to him [50:40].
"Can't countenance the bullshit anymore"
Recorded interview here
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  1  
Sat 25 Nov, 2017 08:27 am
I'm struggling here to fathom just how clueless you kids really are.

You take wide swipes at people while exhibiting zero thought and action.

Are you waiting for an angel to come swooping down sometime soon?

Someone to sort out all of your probs, bro?
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Sat 25 Nov, 2017 08:29 am
"Big Money Rules, by Dianne Ravich at NYRB
Quote:
I grew up in the 1950s, an era when many believed that our society would inevitably progress toward ever greater economic equality. Desperate poverty would recede, it was assumed, as new federal programs addressed the needs of those at the very bottom of the ladder and as economic growth created new jobs. The average CEO at the time earned only twenty times as much as the average worker, and during the Eisenhower administration the marginal tax rate for the highest earners was 91 percent. Today, the goal of equality appears to be receding. The top marginal tax rate is only 39 percent, far below what it was during the Eisenhower years, and most Republicans would like to lower it even more. Employers now make 271 times as much as the average worker, and half the children in American schools are officially classified by the federal government as low-income and eligible for free or reduced-price lunch. Union membership peaked in the mid-1950s and has declined ever since; the largest unions today are in the public sector and only about 7 percent of private sector workers belong to a union.

... In uncatalogued stacks of papers she came across personal correspondence between Buchanan and the billionaire Republican donor Charles Koch.

What she pieced together, she writes, was a plan “to train a new generation of thinkers to push back against Brown and the changes in constitutional thought and federal policy that had enabled it.” This was indeed a bold project: most mainstream economists in the postwar era had long accepted Keynesian doctrines that affirmed the power of the federal government to regulate the economy and protect the rights of workers to organize in unions. Buchanan’s rejection of governmental actions that he thought infringed on individual liberty and his defense of states’ rights gave intellectual ammunition to those who opposed both Keynesian economics and federal interventions in the states to enforce desegregation.

The reigning rightwing economic theory in the US has two parts, in ascending order:
1) those who are poor deserve to be poor and those who have a ****-ton of money deserve to have it
2) those who are poor actually have more money than they deserve and the very rich deserve much more.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Sat 25 Nov, 2017 08:56 am
@blatham,
Clinton’s crimes against Juanita Broaddrick never saw investigation. He paid Paula Jones with hush money, modus operandi of his pal Weinstein.

Charges against Clarence Thomas were given a public hearing more open than any I’ve heard previous or since, alongside Clinton’s impeachment trial for having weird sex with a White House intern.

I don’t think any sane person could argue that point.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_570fb8f9e4b0ffa5937e5e72/amp

Ailes’ mess was spread all over the news, then he died.

O’Reilly was fired.

It is time to stop apologizing for any powerful abuser. It is time to stop supporting sex abusers of any political party.

Conyers, Clinton, and Franken need to face the music. They all do. Stop supporting predators of women.



0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.42 seconds on 05/21/2024 at 01:40:20