@Builder,
Builder wrote:Brandon9000 wrote:The 2nd Amendment also says, "shall not be infringed." To infringe means to limit or undermine. Presumably, if people have the right to guns, then they have the right to guns which would be likely to be effective in the situations that realistically might be a danger to them.
It is certainly a rather gray area of contention, and with almost 340 million people party to the "debate", it won't be over until the porcine person of a particular gender vocalises sopranically.
There is no gray area. Americans have the right to carry guns for self defense when they go about in public.
Builder wrote:Still not sure why this thread is now meandering so far from the OP.
That's what happens when humans discuss things. The topic of interest may center around a main theme, but the subject meanders as other subjects temporarily become interesting for a time.
Builder wrote:It's not a week since the usual suspects were chastising all and sundry for not staying on topic.
The left is hypocritical that way. It's a variation of the way they want the law to apply to everyone else, but want to be above the law themselves. They want this thread to always focus on harming people who disagree with them, and never focus on anything that will harm them.
I advise not paying any attention to complaints of that nature.
