https://hotair.com/archives/2017/11/06/fishy-japan-suddenly-sees-major-boost-fake-news-exports-trump-arrival/?utm_source=hadaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl
Justin McCurry of The Guardian wrote:
White House reporters, keen perhaps to pick up on a Trump gaffe, captured the moment when he upended his box on their smartphones and tweeted evidence of his questionable grasp of fish keeping. However, other footage made clear that Trump was merely following his host’s lead.
Hot Air wrote:Yes, and had CNN shown the wide-angle footage from the beginning, it wouldn’t have been an issue at all. Like any president on a state visit, Trump took his cues from his counterpart.
Hot Air wrote:A second fake-news eruption came out of a meeting with auto manufacturers, a particularly thorny trade issue in the US. News media reported that Trump asked Japanese carmakers to build in the US. “Try building your cars in the United States instead of shipping them over,” Trump said. “Is that possible to ask? That’s not rude. Is that rude? I don’t think so.”
CNN and Slate immediately went to the fact-checkers. “Trump asks Japan to build cars in the U.S. It already does,” CNN headlined its report. Slate’s Jordan Weissman advised, “Perhaps someone should ask Trump where he thinks Toyota builds all those Camrys it sells in California. He might be pleasantly surprised to learn the answer.”
Our Pres. Trump wrote:And in the room, we have a couple of the great folks from two of the biggest auto companies in the world that are building new plants and doing expansions of other plants. And you know who you are, and I want to just thank you very much. I want to thank you.
I also want to recognize the business leaders in the room whose confidence in the United States — they’ve been creating jobs — you have such confidence in the United States, and you’ve been creating jobs for our country for a long, long time. Several Japanese automobile industry firms have been really doing a job. And we love it when you build cars — if you’re a Japanese firm, we love it — try building your cars in the United States instead of shipping them over.
Actually, he said, not wrote.
Aaron Blake - WAPO wrote:But this is completely unfair to Trump. A look at this fuller remarks makes clear he did know that Japanese cars are built in the United States. He even talked about it at-length and praised the manufacturers for the amount of jobs they’ve created here. …
Even if you isolate that one quote, it could be read simply as a plea for Japan to build more cars in the United States, which it seems is exactly what Trump meant.
Trump says plenty of things that are false or that belie a lack of familiarity with the subject at-hand. But spotlighting this quote as evidence of the latter is extremely uncharitable.
Hot Air wrote:However, news organizations are supposed to report the news in its fullest context, not serve on Gaffe Watch and slice it up to justify their own biases. Rather than work responsibly to cover events, American media now seem to be entirely focused on creating memes. We can get plenty of those on social media from other sources, thank you very much.
Margaret Sullivan of WAPO wrote:When there’s no agreed-upon reality — no Walter Cronkite as the most trusted man in America — we’re all in trouble.
This feeling of mistrust and disagreement on facts is backed up by public opinion polls: One reported last month that 46 percent of Americans believe the news media simply makes things up about Trump.
The president has been sowing those seeds of mistrust for many months, and cultivates them daily with extra-strength fertilizer.
Hot Air wrote:Well, if the first day of Trump’s Asia trip is an example of Sullivan’s “golden age” of journalism, then there’s plenty of fertilizer getting spread around without Trump to add even more.
Two perfect examples of why Americans' trust in the New Media is so pathetically low, and if Sullivan really cares to explorable this lamentable state of affairs, she should pay attention to them.
Maybe Aaron Blake and a handful of other journalists are feeling the heat generated by the malpractice of their brethren, and don't like what it means for their profession. If so, Blake in particular, need not leave his office to seek relief. The Washington Post has repeatedly been guilty of publishing "news" which they have latter had to issue retractions upon.
The most
charitable explanation is that competition in the News marketplace and corporate concerns for profit are pushing journalists to take shortcuts and ignore long established standards so they may trumpet a scoop and get clicks. (There's a link to Sullivan's article, but unless you are already paying WAPO for access to its online site, you won't get to see it...unless of course you are seduced by her headline and are willing to pay for the pleasure of reading yet another WAPO writer savage Trump.
Less charitable would be to credit the fall-off from standards, not from the pressure of the bottom-line, but from the zeal to bash Trump that for ideological reasons or simply the need to conform for the sake of one's career, is so pervasive with the MSM.
Least charitable of course but most likely is that for same reasons driving the former, journalists without a shred of integrity are manipulating stories or just making **** up. It's hard to imagine that anyone actually covering the two Japan stories cited wasn't able to come to the same conclusions as McCurry or Blake. If they were they should be fired for incompetence. Instead, they knew exactly what they were doing, which is incredibly dishonest and a real danger to an American institution our democracy relies pretty heavily upon.
There seems to a well-established meme within the MSM when it comes to Trump:
"He makes **** up, so we should to!" Some clown (whose moniker escapes me)from the NYT actually wrote an Op-Ed piece rationalizing how failing to adhere to the standards taught in Journalism 101 is not only forgivable in the case of
The Dread Pirate Donald, but a journalistic duty.
Some will dismiss these two examples of fake news as trivial; signifying nothing.
"It's not like they reported he murdered someone or declared war on North Korea" or, worse,
"Hey, we all know Trump is an oafish bull in the china shop. If these stories were manipulated to show that, it's still reporting The Truth." Either, I believe, would be a large mistake. If you are hoping that the News Media will play a major role in bringing down Trump, those hopes may be dashed
if nearly half the country believes they are making **** up about him. Sure, he's fostered the suspicion, and at times disingenuously, but if the MSM wasn't guilty as charged so frequently, his cynical but brilliant counter-strategy couldn't work...
with half the country.
Not to mention that everyone should be disappointed, outraged and scared when the institution we have foolishly trusted to tell us the truth, in countering the lies and deception of the powerful, is itself lying, and engaged in deceit. However the current, deeply divided, political environment in this country along with what should be a gift from the internet (scores of new sources for news) has enabled the great majority of us to do what we've always wanted: Consume news that confirms our biases. As a result, transgressions are trivialized, excused or denied and in the case of heavy duty ideological
warriors, welcomed and encouraged.