@hightor,
Quote:But the Russians evidently got a big bang for their buck:
And clever marketing is now a crime? All marketing carries a level of BS, and you'd have to be naive to think otherwise.
What this does tell me, is that the presidency doesn't have to be going to he/she who raises the most money (as if that was ever a democratic decision).
Quote:Where did anyone claim that Russia spent more than the combined totals of the two candidates and their campaign committees?
The point you're missing, is that social media isn't a US-oriented tool. It's a global platform, and anyone can, and will, use it as they like. Hounding the sellers of advertising, for selling advertising, in a purported "free-market capitalist" state, is ludicrous.
Quote:Where did anyone claim that the Russians even spent a comparable amount to that spent by the candidates?
Repeating yourself for the peanut gallery?
The effectiveness of their spend is where you need to focus.
Why did the US election campaigners fail, with their massive spend, where the insurgents succeeded, with so little monetary input, is the question.