monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

-- a real monster for our times.

US President Donald Trump is expected to withdraw backing from the nuclear accord with Iran on Friday and lay out a more confrontational strategy.
The move would not withdraw the US from the deal but give Congress 60 days to decide whether to do so by re-imposing sanctions.
Secretary of State Rex Tillerson has been consulting with counterparts in Europe and China, officials said.
Mr Trump has been under pressure at home and abroad not to scrap the deal.
Under the 2015 accord, Iran agreed to freeze its nuclear programme in return for the partial lifting of sanctions.
President Trump has been a longstanding critic of the deal and pledged to scrap it during his campaign.
Congress requires the US president to certify every 90 days that Iran is upholding its part of the agreement. Mr Trump has already recertified it twice.
Speculation that Mr Trump might refuse to recertify the deal has caused alarm among US allies and some members of his own administration.
Defence Secretary James Mattis told a Senate hearing earlier this month it was not in the national interest to abandon it.
President Trump has called the Iran nuclear accord the "worst deal ever negotiated", and threatened to tear it up.
It looks, though, as if he will first try to "fix" it. He is expected to tell Congress that Iran is not meeting certain conditions set by US law; that the deal's benefits are too meagre, for example, to justify continued sanctions relief.
Then it would be up to lawmakers to decide whether to re-impose sanctions.
Mr Trump is unlikely to advocate they do so now. Even critics of the deal fear this would isolate the US and weaken its credibility, because Iran is complying with the agreement.
Republicans have suggested they could use decertification as leverage to get the changes they want.
Ed Royce, Republican chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said that though the deal was "flawed, I believe we must now enforce the hell out of it".
Foreign leaders, including British PM Theresa May and French President Emmanuel Macron, have urged Mr Trump to keep the deal.
Mr Trump recently reaffirmed his long-held opposition to the accord, calling it "one of the most incompetently drawn deals I've ever seen".
"They got a path to nuclear weapons very quickly, and think of this one - $1.7bn in cash," he told Fox News, referring to a decision by the Obama administration to settle a decades-long legal claim with Iran as part of the deal.
Mr Trump has repeatedly said Iran has broken the "spirit" of the deal, although the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and Congress agree Iran is complying with the terms of the agreement.
The 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action was designed to prevent Iran developing a nuclear weapon.
It lifted some sanctions that stopped Iran from trading on international markets and selling oil.
The lifting of sanctions is dependent on Iran restricting its nuclear programme. It must curb its uranium stockpile, build no more heavy-water reactors for 15 years, and allow inspectors into the country.

What you mean is that he's better at breaking than making deals.

You're giving him more credit for influence than he actually has.

what actually motivates Trump, who often brags about his own dealmaking abilities, to seek withdrawal from so many international agreements

The time for whispered criticisms and quiet snickering is over. The time for panic and decision is upon us. The thin line of sane, responsible advisers at the White House — such as Chief of Staff John F. Kelly, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson — could break at any moment. Already, Trump’s protests of eternal love for Kelly are a bad sign for the general’s future. The American government now has a dangerous fragility at its very center. Its welfare is as thin as an eggshell — perhaps as thin as Donald Trump’s skin.

Any elected Republican who shares Corker’s concerns has a political and moral duty to state them in public. If Corker is correct, many of his colleagues do have such fears. Their silence is deafening and damning.

Trump ‘drains the swamp’ by appointing Lockheed Martin executive to Pentagon position
It's unclear why the president has selected someone whose company he's heavily criticized.