monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

I originally posted the above link when I was replying to Oralloy in an earlier post.

Oralloy is making up his own interpretation.

Snood, click on the link and read it for yourself. Don't accept Oralloy ridiculous interpretation.

There is nothing in this link that backs up or supports Oralloy claims of BLM advocating the murder of police.

Even Oralloy own excerpts that he is citing from the link does not show BLM advocating the murder of police officer.

Also, nowhere in Oralloy excerpts that it supports in any way his claim that George Zimmerman was defending himself against a black person trying to murder him.

Oralloy's excerpt from link above:

Quote:

She’d been expecting a conviction, for manslaughter if not murder, but Zimmerman was acquitted. “It felt like a gut punch, you know?”

Can anyone show me where in this excerpt that Oralloy is citing, does it state that George Zimmerman was defending himself? And can anyone show me where in this excerpt that Oralloy is citing, does it state that Treyvon Martin was a murderous black person? The answer is: it doesn't.

Here is Oralloy other excerpt he cited from the link:

Quote:

the afternoon before, in Ferguson, Missouri, 18-year-old Michael Brown had been shot and killed by Darren Wilson, a police officer.

This was a turning point for #blacklivesmatter. In the following weeks, as the slogan trended on Twitter and Facebook, it became synonymous with the protests taking place across the country, as close as the disparate movement came to a clarion call.

Can anyone show me where in this excerpt that Oralloy is citing, does it states that BLM supports or advocate the murdering of police officer? The answer is: it doesn't.

You repeat it over and over and over... Prove that BLM advocates cop-killing.

She’d been expecting a conviction, for manslaughter if not murder, but Zimmerman was acquitted. “It felt like a gut punch, you know?”

the afternoon before, in Ferguson, Missouri, 18-year-old Michael Brown had been shot and killed by Darren Wilson, a police officer.

This was a turning point for #blacklivesmatter. In the following weeks, as the slogan trended on Twitter and Facebook, it became synonymous with the protests taking place across the country, as close as the disparate movement came to a clarion call.

I think you're missing the point of Kaepernick's silent protest, though. Cops are killing black Americans with seeming impunity.

There's no end to videos of violence enacted by the police, against black American people, where the only "crime" apparent, is resisting arrest, even when there's no crime to begin with.

Try debating that truth.

I haven't bothered to read your reply to my post because you're so infuriatingly predicable in your repetitive comments.

I swear if you ever showed any ideological independence a single time, I'd faint in a state of shock.

You think conservatives are ALWAYS right; so, your comments are always going to be predicable.

In contrast to you, although I agree with some stances on the political left, I'm still independent of the progressive movement:

The point is that I don't make a religion or a cult out of a political ideology that may have its good points, but is certainly NOT infallible as if it were God.

I suppose you have no problem with the fire chief publicly calling Coach Tomlin a "no-good n*gger."

If you had been an adult in the 1950s and the 1960s, you probably would have been defending the Southern segregationists and other white supremacists all in the name of "states rights"; and if you had been living during the Roaring Twenties, you probably would have been tempted to participate in one of the many spectacular Ku Klux Klan marches.

But in the meantime, you remind me that there is a particular kind of person who simply is beyond reason and is not a suitable candidate for a civil discussion. That's because that person "reasons" thusly: "My side is ALWAYS right; and whoever disagrees with it is intellectually dishonest and EVIL, EVIL, EVIL!"

Sadly speaking, what's also true is that the "side" in question may have nothing to do with politics! I had that experience when I started posting at websites in the spring of 2009. Some of the most hateful posts I've ever read have had nothing to do with politics.

Whether the "side" is politics or not, trying to reason with such a person is like repeatedly pounding your proverbial head against the proverbial wall. It's an exercise in futility! I feel like pulling my hair out!

I give you credit for stamina. You're calm and collected while I feel like shrieking.

I feel better now. I always do after a good rant. Unless I end up with feelings of guilt.