@Lash,
Quote:A primer on the term limousine liberal for know-it-alls who don't know so much:
Gee, thanks. But you haven't told me anything I didn't already know, and I hope your comment is not directed at me — nor do I fit the description of a "limousine liberal".
I recall Procaccino and his sort of politics very well and remember his use of the term. It's misleading to say it was a Democrat vs Republican context; in a city without a strong GOP the conservative wing of the Democratic Party functioned much the way the Tea Party would like to pretend it does today — but "Porkaccino" didn't have the Koch brothers funding his campaign. Of course the angry voters could always find some minor party to represent them, like the "Taxpayer's Party" perennially fronted by Vito Batista.
Anyway, the term was clearly coined to reflect — and stoke — envy and resentment. Now it's more of a petty insult, as if there's something wrong with a wealthy person actively supporting social change. It's now often used against the Hollywood types the GOP finds so reprehensible.
Quote:These self-righteous folk couldn’t care less, Procaccino proclaimed, about the “small shopkeeper, the homeowner. . . . They preach the politics of confrontation and condone violent upheaval.”
To make that charge against John Lindsay is ridiculous.
Somebody had to buck the entrenched power of Tammany Hall and work to secure the civil rights and promote the economic security of the city's minority population. Lindsay was well-respected by the Hispanic, black, and mainstream liberal portion of the Democratic electorate.
Quote:And, do a little reading, will you, before pontificating and accusing? You seem Trumpish.
Trump doesn't "pontificate".