192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
layman
 
  -4  
Wed 9 Aug, 2017 11:46 am
@ehBeth,
ehBeth wrote:
aaaaaaaaaand we can tell which sources you're following by that take on it


We don't you enlighten us on what the commie-ass sources you "follow" say, eh? Do they dispute anything I just said?
layman
 
  -4  
Wed 9 Aug, 2017 12:11 pm
@layman,
layman wrote:

ehBeth wrote:
aaaaaaaaaand we can tell which sources you're following by that take on it

We don't you enlighten us on what the commie-ass sources you "follow" say, eh? Do they dispute anything I just said?

I say, eh? Here ya go, here's some excerpts from the Trump-hating WaPo, who "broke" this story, allegedly via leaks from "people familiar with the special counsel investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election."

Quote:
Manafort has been voluntarily producing documents to congressional committees investigating Russia’s interference in the 2016 presidential election. The documents included materials Manafort had already provided to Congress, said people familiar with the search.

Manafort has provided documents to both the Senate Judiciary Committee and the Senate and House intelligence committees. The documents are said to include notes Manafort took while attending a meeting with Donald Trump Jr. and a Russian lawyer at Trump Tower in June 2016.

“If the FBI wanted the documents, they could just ask [Manafort] and he would have turned them over,” said one adviser close to the White House. “Mr. Manafort has consistently cooperated with law enforcement and other serious inquiries and did so on this occasion as well,” said Maloni, the spokesman for Manafort.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/fbi-conducted-predawn-raid-of-former-trump-campaign-chairman-manaforts-home/2017/08/09/5879fa9c-7c45-11e7-9d08-b79f191668ed_story.html?utm_term=.324ea85df642
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  -1  
Wed 9 Aug, 2017 12:24 pm
@glitterbag,
glitterbag wrote:

Shame on you Georgeob, it should be beneath you to even think of a sentence that puts the right of Americans to vote for our representatives in Local, State and Federal elections on a par with individual States establishing laws to regulate the privilege of driving a motor vehicle.


Get a grip on yourself. No shame and no par either. I merely pointed out - accurately - the readily verifiable facts that states are empowered to, and do, regulate voter registration qualifications and procedures, and those for Drivers licensing on the same constitutional sovereign authority. Other constitutional limitations exist and apply, but this state level authority does indeed exist. For example there are minimum ages established for both voting and driving. Voting generally requires proof of residency., etc. There's nothing either inherently new or prejudicial in either .... of, for that matter unique to this country about either..
layman
 
  -3  
Wed 9 Aug, 2017 12:36 pm
@georgeob1,
The "shame" is to be cast on Bag, whose "reasoning" is infantile. To begin with, she is just plain WRONG in suggesting that voter regulation is improper because "voting is a right."

Throwing in a cliche like "driving is a privilege" just enhances the exposure of her weak-ass suggestion.

Hey, Bag, try this some time. Don't register to vote, then go to the poll and DEMAND that you be afforded your RIGHT to vote, eh? If they offer to let you register on the spot, tell them to stick their registration form up their ass.

That way, you'll have a multi-million dollar suit against them for depriving you of your civil RIGHT to vote, see!?

If you really want to get rich, don't renew your driver's license or your license plates either. Then, when you get arrested, sue them for FALSE ARREST.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  5  
Wed 9 Aug, 2017 12:44 pm
@layman,
layman wrote:
We don't you enlighten us on what the commie-ass sources you "follow" say, eh? Do they dispute anything I just said?


RT, gopusa, newsmax are among the sites I reviewed

not suggesting anything was disputed - noting that your source can be identified as you have used their exact wording Smile

___

If you've lost track of things, commie-ass isn't an insult on the political right these days.

http://www.france24.com/en/20161115-why-west-right-wing-admires-putin-le-pen-farage-trump

Quote:
Russian President Vladimir Putin is widely admired by right-wing leaders in Western democracies – including Donald Trump, Nigel Farage and Marine Le Pen – a stark reversal from when conservatives were the staunchest of Cold Warriors.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has garnered much admiration in recent years from a bevy of right-wing politicians who have praised everything from his single-minded pursuit of Russian national interests to his rejection of “elitist” liberal values.

Republican US President-elect Donald Trump, UK Independence Party (UKIP) leader Nigel Farage and French National Front leader Marine Le Pen have all expressed varying degrees of appreciation for the Russian leader’s approach to international affairs.


http://www.newsweek.com/russias-putin-says-he-always-liked-communist-socialist-ideas-419289

Quote:
“You know that I, like millions of Soviet citizens, over 20 million, was a member of the Communist Party of the USSR and not only was I a member of the party but I worked for almost 20 years for an organization called the Committee for State Security,” Putin said, referring to the KGB.

“I was not, as you know, a party member by necessity,” he said. “I liked Communist and socialist ideas very much and I like them still.”


the very entertaining frontpage take on the same quote

http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/261611/putin-i-liked-communist-and-socialist-ideas-very-daniel-greenfield



__

why consider frontpage? because we see so much of their perspective reflected in posts on this thread

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm

Daniel Greenfield has tremendous set of followers

http://www.frontpagemag.com/point
old europe
 
  4  
Wed 9 Aug, 2017 12:47 pm
@georgeob1,
I think the founders should have put the right to vote and the right to bear arms into the same amendment. It would make the hypocrisy much easier to spot.
ehBeth
 
  3  
Wed 9 Aug, 2017 12:47 pm
@blatham,
frontpage on McMaster

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/267473/mcmasters-nsc-coup-against-trump-purges-critics-daniel-greenfield

http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/267526/mcmasters-media-sycophants-refuse-address-issue-daniel-greenfield

The Greenfield followers ... aren't hard to spot.
layman
 
  -2  
Wed 9 Aug, 2017 12:48 pm
@ehBeth,
ehBeth wrote:
not suggesting anything was disputed - noting that your source can be identified as you have used their exact wording Smile


"exact words," eh? Got a quote?

What a coincidence, eh? The other day I reminded someone that "Trump is the president."

Come to find out that many in the media have said the exact same thing. Amazing that so many of us, just making up random lies, willy-nilly, happen to invent the same damn lie, eh?
maporsche
 
  4  
Wed 9 Aug, 2017 12:51 pm
Registering to vote? Not a violation of your rights, what's your problem?

Registering to own a firearm? YOU PUNK ASS COMMIE LIBTARD SCUMBAG!!!!!!
ehBeth
 
  2  
Wed 9 Aug, 2017 01:06 pm
@layman,
layman wrote:
Amazing that so many of us, just making up random lies, willy-nilly, happen to invent the same damn lie, eh?


not so amazing when the sources can be tracked

___

I've been following far-right/right/left/far-left media for a number of decades. Media and politics are two of my long-term areas of interest/study.

In cases like this thread where people get what they post say interests me more than the content.
layman
 
  -2  
Wed 9 Aug, 2017 01:14 pm
@ehBeth,
ehBeth wrote:

I've been following far-right/right/left/far-left media for a number of decades. Media and politics are two of my long-term areas of interest/study.

In cases like this thread where people get what they post say interests me more than the content.


Well, aint that special, eh? Tell me, Beth, since you're the expert, what does it reveal to you if a person insists on getting all his "news" from CNN?
ehBeth
 
  3  
Wed 9 Aug, 2017 01:17 pm
@layman,
Any person that deliberately considers only one source of noise/news is not interested in gathering new information.
Below viewing threshold (view)
layman
 
  -1  
Wed 9 Aug, 2017 01:36 pm
Even the lame-ass Wapo sees what's happening with Mueller, eh?

WaPo wrote:
Mueller has increased legal pressure on Manafort, consolidating under his authority a series of unrelated investigations into various aspects of Manafort’s professional and personal life.


I've seen some claim that Manafort was engaged in "money laundering" (whatever that is, exactly). If that's a crime, and theres's a valid basis for suspecting it, then it should be investigated. But not by Mueller, who is limited to investigating russian involvement in the political campaign. Likewise, of course, with Manafort's "personal life."

Mueller will be fired for a variety of good causes, including disregard of the instructions given to him, eh?

WaPo wrote:
Manafort’s allies fear that Mueller hopes to build a case against Manafort unrelated to the 2016 campaign, in hopes that the former campaign operative would provide information against others in Trump’s inner circle in exchange for lessening his own legal exposure.


Mueller is trying to "extort" testimony from Manafort (reliable or not), eh? Cops do it all the time. They plant drugs on a punk-ass bitch, and then demand that he provide incriminating testimony against his homeboys.

0 Replies
 
maporsche
 
  6  
Wed 9 Aug, 2017 01:49 pm
@maporsche,
maporsche wrote:

Registering to vote? Not a violation of your rights, what's your problem?

Registering to own a firearm? YOU PUNK ASS COMMIE LIBTARD SCUMBAG!!!!!!


a) Registering to vote is a good idea so that we can know who you are, know that your not voting for someone else, and know that you're eligible to vote (i.e. not a felon or crazy person).

b) Registering your firearms is a horrible idea. No one has the right to restrict our freedoms no matter if I'm a crazy person, buying a gun for someone else, and they damn sure don't have a right to know who I am and if I own a gun!!!
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  -1  
Wed 9 Aug, 2017 02:01 pm
@layman,
Going for the record!
blatham
 
  3  
Wed 9 Aug, 2017 02:29 pm
@blatham,
First Hannity goes after McConnell, then Dan Scavino and now Trump (in the Latin, Colossus Idiotus)
Quote:
Donald J. Trump ✔ @realDonaldTrump
Senator Mitch McConnell said I had "excessive expectations," but I don't think so. After 7 years of hearing Repeal & Replace, why not done?
11:14 AM - Aug 9, 2017
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Wed 9 Aug, 2017 02:33 pm
@old europe,
Quote:
Re: georgeob1 (Post 6480782)
I think the founders should have put the right to vote and the right to bear arms into the same amendment. It would make the hypocrisy much easier to spot.
Brilliant.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -1  
Wed 9 Aug, 2017 02:42 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Finn dAbuzz wrote:

Going for the record!

Ya still got a way to go, Finn. I claim the record. I once racked up 36 and was quickly banned for 6 months. There was nothing insulting or vulgar in the post, but the cheese-eaters didn't like the factual challenge presented, ya know?
blatham
 
  3  
Wed 9 Aug, 2017 02:43 pm
@ehBeth,
Jeez. It's been years since I even peeked in at FrontPage. I'd set myself the task of actually reading one of Horowitz's books front to back, which I did, and I deemed that experience as something akin to the trudge up Calvary. Once was definitely enough.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.42 seconds on 04/26/2024 at 12:04:00