monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

Donald Trump’s pick to lead the FBI said he did not believe a special counsel investigation into possible coordination between Russia and Trump aides was a “witch-hunt”.
At the Senate confirmation hearing, Christopher Wray says he sees ‘no reason to doubt’ Russia meddled in the 2016 election.

Does this mean, there will be another, different candidate?

I don't think even Trump would make an idiot move and try to fire the FBI director candidate before he's confirmed.

You had this same feeling about Hillary winning the election and then felt the very same way about some sort of election fraud by Trump and company when you supported Jill Steins silly recount efforts. I wonder what she did with all that extra money she made on that scam...

This is going to amount to nothing just like the rest of the election scams you have supported.

Source: Page 85

PS: It's already been established that a contribution does not have to be money.

It doesn't have to be money, no. It could be, for example, an expensive yacht. But it has to be a "thing." Information is not a tangible "thing."

Paying for a recount, which by law you are allowed to do, is your idea of a "scam"? Oh, by the way, even with the money Stein raised, she did not get a full vote-by-vote recount in any of the three states she paid the money for.

And your "Stein-is-keeping-the-money" charge commenced BEFORE any recounts, flawed or otherwise, were even allowed! Nobody knew how much the recounts would cost, and you were posting over and over about how she was supposedly keeping the "extra" money-when you didn't even know if she'd have enough money to get the recounts done in the first place. Sleazy.

Finally, didn't you hear about the Russians hacking the voter rolls in several states? Oh, they don't cover that in right wing news, so you never heard about it. The Russians were hacking the lists of eligible voters in several counties, especially the ones that lean strongly Democratic. If you'll remember 2000, there were extreme problems with people in Democratic leaning counties disappearing from the voter rolls and told they were ineligible to vote on Election Day.

So tell me, why was I wrong saying it was a possibility that the Russians tampered with the vote? Looks like they were certainly attempting to tamper with the number of people allowed to vote in Democratic leaning precincts.

Quote:

Ahem. Mueller and the committees are investigating collusion between the Trump campaign and Russians to affect the election. Well, they just got it. Sorry, but no amount of "Really dahling, surely you aren't serious about this amounting to anything" is going to change that.

You had this same feeling about Hillary winning the election and then felt the very same way about some sort of election fraud by Trump and company when you supported Jill Steins silly recount efforts. I wonder what she did with all that extra money she made on that scam...

This is going to amount to nothing just like the rest of the election scams you have supported.

I am listening to the confirmation hearing of the new FBI on the internet, what a politician he is. He gives no straight answers. The only positive answer he gives so far is agreeing the Russian investigation is not a witch hunt.

Opposition Research is a thing.

Not bullshit. The republicans are actually, in fact, holding closed door meetings with just 13 white republican men.

The democrats aren't happy but they know they lost the election. That's it, they lost and there are no avenues to crown a runner-up.