@layman,
Quote:Handel’s victory in the closely fought contest
Quote:With 99 percent of the vote counted, Handel leads Ossoff 53 percent to 47 percent in a race that many expected to be much closer.
Was it really ever closely fought and why might "many" have expected the race to be much closer? Could it be because the MSM were incredibly biased and maybe even dishonest and deceptive in their reporting on the race due to their deeply held hope that Ossoff would pull off an upset in a reliably Republican district that sent Newt Gingrich to Washington and voted for Trump in 2016?
I've been getting Alerts on my cellphone from WaPo and Vox that have reported that Handel appears to have "eked' out a win over Ossof, and Trump has "narrowly" avoided an embarrassing loss. With a 53/47 victory by Handel?
It's pretty clear that certain MSM outlets have chosen to report the news with the sort of partisan spin you would expect from the War Room of a political campaign HQ. The Washington Post and New York Times are the worst offenders, but not the only ones.
This is from WaPo on line though:
Quote:Handel won by almost 11,000 votes and by more than four percentage points, and Ossoff failed to reach the 48 percent mark that he topped in the initial round of voting in April.
Factual and without spin.
Quote:Handel’s victory, however, revealed as much about Trump’s lingering problems among Republicans as it did the challenges facing Democrats. In a ruby-red district that her Republican predecessor won in November by 23 points, Handel struggled with Trump’s looming presence over the race. She won not with an embrace of the president but by barely mentioning his name.
WaPo has to find the silver lining in the dark cloud, but while this point is quite overstated it's not completely off the mark, but the actual mark is not a major surprise or vastly significant. While the Democrats clearly were looking to make this a national race and a referendum on Trump, time and time again congressional races prove to be far more local that party strategists would like. It shouldn't startle anyone, least of all the GOP or the White House, that the outcome of this race cannot be perceived as an overwhelming endorsement of the Trump presidency, or that Handel didn't run as a surrogate for Trump. The Democrats wanted a referendum on Trump, but towards the end of the campaign, Ossoff abandoned that strategy and doubled down on the centrist message he had formulated from the start, hoping to woo away enough Republican voters to win. If all of his California donors actually knew what he was saying during the race, they may not have dipped into their pockets so often and as deeply.
Handel didn't so much run away from Trump as she ran to and as Handel. WaPo would like us to believe Handel considered Trump toxic when it was much more the case that she knew associating herself with him alone was not a winning strategy. The only one who might have thought that running as a Georgia Peach version of Trump was a guaranteed victory was Trump himself. It's not as if Handel ran as an anti-Trump Republican though. So this victory only told us what we already knew, Trump is not likely to win any Republican a seat in a district where the Democrat is favored, but he's not likely to kill a Republican's chances for victory in a district in which they are the favorite. Of course the GOP and White House would like to see the former changed, but to do that Trump has to achieve things the voters will like and the Democrats are doing all that is within their power (and the power of their allies) to prevent this.
Quote:Despite the contest’s national sheen and implications, many voters here said they made their decision based less on Trump and more on how they view the two candidates
Uh, duh!
I will say that with this article WaPo didn't try to spin this as any sort of victory for the Democrats, (How could they though, when that approach has been attempted and failed with each special election held so far.) and they did point out something the Democrats should be worried about: Nancy Pelosi may be more toxic than Donald Trump
Quote:Moreover, Ossoff’s loss raises real concerns about the continued potency of Republican attacks against Democrats by tying them to House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.). The anti-Ossoff campaign seemed to veer from issue to issue given the week, but the one constant thread over the last four months has been linking him to Pelosi.
According to one Republican involved in the effort, the Democratic leader had a name identification of 98 percent among voters in the Georgia district, and her disapproval ratings were 35 percentage points higher than her approval numbers.