monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

@blatham,

blatham wrote:

I wrote an essay while at university on the question of knowledge versus certainty.

Ambrose Bierce wrote:

To be positive: To be mistaken at the top of one's voice.

Mark Twain wrote:

It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.

1 Reply

@blatham,

So you argued knowledge over certainty?

My knowledge tells me Obama was a failed president.

I am certain about very few things, but so should everyone else. Therefore we are left with our uncertain knowledge to guide us and mine leads me to the nearly certain conclusion that Obama was a lousy POTUS.

1 Reply

@Finn dAbuzz,

Like, the lousiest, eh, Finn?

Cheese-eatin ************.

1 Reply

@layman,

Maybe not the lousiest, but lousy nevertheless.

2 Replies

@Finn dAbuzz,

Finn dAbuzz wrote:

Maybe not the lousiest, but lousy nevertheless.

Neville Chamberlain may have been lousier, as the leader of a country, but he wasn't ever Prez of the U.S., so......

Obama makes Chamberlain look like General George "blood and guts" Patton, eh?

1 Reply

@layman,

LBJ was much lousier than Obama

1 Reply

@Finn dAbuzz,

Well, matter of opinion, I guess. Johnson was a complete pyschopathic liar and manipulator, sure, but at least his skills in that department far exceeded those of Obama, even if his plans and methods didn't really differ. Johnson was much more "effective" in that regard.

Like Hitler, before he made his fatal mistake of deciding to prematurely invade Russia, Johnson was effective in accomplishing his agenda and was, in that sense, a "great" leader of his country, I figure.

1 Reply

@Finn dAbuzz,

Quote Finn:

Quote:

Maybe not the lousiest, but lousy nevertheless.

When Obama first took office, the country had LOST 6 Million Full Time jobs in the previous year. In his last seven years, the country GAINED 14 Million Full Time jobs while Obama was in the White House. By contrast, his predecessor's Administration only produced 1.6 Million Full Time jobs.

Apparently, your idea of a lousy president is one who gets lots of people working.

0 Replies

@layman,

When Attila the Hun, and his teeming yellow horde, came across a western city surrounded by walls, he would call one of his trusted generals to ride up next to him.

Then, in full sight of the inhabitants manning the towers, he would take out his sword and chop off that general's head.

Then he would yell: "If that's what I do to my own homeboys, what in the **** do you think I'm gunna do to you if you put me to the trouble of busting down your walls, just to get your gold, and ****?"

Invariably, after a little reflection, the gates would swing open.

Then the hordes would trot on in and take everything of value, including the (attractive) women. After killing every sorry inhabitant of the city first, of course.

Now, that's what I would call "effective," ya know?

1 Reply

@Blickers,

Blickers wrote:

Whether it is a crime is not relevant at this time. The House has already ruled that interfering with an investigation is impeachable.

This whole "I know, let's get Trump impeached by claiming he's Putin's puppet" plan of the cheese-eaters is only the latest in a long (and never-ending) series of totally irrational attempts to overthrow the elected government.

First it was the recount.

Then it was the "sure-fire" plan to get electoral college delegates to violate their oaths.

Then it was the "sure-fire" emoluments clause bullshit, that was certainly going to run Trump out of office.

Then it was the 25th amendment "impairment" strategy that was gunna do the trick.

What next, cheese-eaters? It is just as certain that your insane dreams will continue as it is that Trump will remain in office, so "what next," I ask ya?

Let me guess, eh? Assassination, that it?

0 Replies

@layman,

Quote:

This guy aint real bright, eh?

Says layman, the coward, the language dunce, now the "expert" on things legal.

0 Replies

@oralloy,

Could you offer something beside oralloy uninformed opinions. All you do is deny deny deny. That isn't proof of anything.

Here you are, oralloy, except he is smarter.

Linda, you're not listening...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkxvlq25Kqw

1 Reply

@layman,

So that's where you Americans learned it.

0 Replies

@layman,

Quote:

Bernie Sanders Doesn’t Think Christians Are Fit For Public Office

I say again, people born in 1940 were not expected to live in their parents basements till age 40...

http://www.bearfabrique.org/Misc/bumpower.jpg

The guy actually looks MORE like a bum than Red Skelton's old Freddy the Freeloader character.

1 Reply

@gungasnake,

You have a vivid imagination. Not an accurate one or realistic or factual. But vivid nonetheless.

0 Replies

@oralloy,

Quote:

Flynn will not testify unless the witch hunt offers him immunity.

Funny thing, if they really want to conduct a witch hunt, the demopoop party has a substantial supply of real witches to go after...

http://photos1.blogger.com/img/93/6320/640/Hot%20Democrat%20Babes.jpg

The thing about not judging books by their covers doesn't apply to demopoop women...

0 Replies

@Blickers,

Blickers wrote:

Article 1 of the Impeachment of Richard Nixon:

That fact that the Democrats have in the past shamefully abused the law to lynch a president is not justification for them doing it again. It is instead justification for outlawing the Democratic Party in America.

Blickers wrote:

Whether it is a crime is not relevant at this time.

Give the Democrats a pass for committing actual crimes, and then lynch Republicans for doing nothing wrong?

Never!

Blickers wrote:

The House has already ruled that interfering with an investigation is impeachable.

Evidence that the Democrats have abused the law this way in the past just reinforces how important it is that we outlaw the Democratic Party.

2 Replies

@Finn dAbuzz,

Finn dAbuzz wrote:

I think blatham can probably be considered an intellectual (whatever the hell that means)

Blatham tries to craft the illusion of being an intellectual by pointing at established leftist intellectuals and saying "I think what they think."

But if Blatham has to do any thinking for himself he quickly runs into trouble and starts spouting name-calling and insults, then places the person who made him have to think on ignore.

Finn dAbuzz wrote:

and Debra Law does have legal knowledge.

She doesn't know some pretty basic legal concepts, and like Blatham she has to divert attention if actually called upon to think for herself. Thus her recent feminist nonsense when she couldn't adequately address your points.

1 Reply

@camlok,

camlok wrote:

Could you offer something beside oralloy uninformed opinions.

My posts have consisted of well-informed facts. Your dislike of reality doesn't make those facts untrue.

0 Replies

@oralloy,

Quote:

That fact that the Democrats have in the past shamefully abused the law to lynch a president is not justification for them doing it again. It is instead justification for outlawing the Democratic Party in America.

You could do that simply based on their women. There has to be some point beyond which ugly is illegal...

0 Replies

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know