192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
layman
 
  -3  
Tue 6 Jun, 2017 02:28 pm
@revelette1,
Muhammad Ali wasn't "hiding" anything when he got into the ring. He was just takin care of business, that's all.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -3  
Tue 6 Jun, 2017 02:38 pm
@blatham,
Trump, he ROCKS, eh!?

Quote:
The Eric Trump Foundation employed no staff until 2015, and its annual expense ratio averaged 13%, about half of what most charities pay in overhead. His original seven-person board was made up of personal friends, an innocuous lot who helped sell tournament tickets, which last year ranged from $3,000 for a single all-day ticket to $100,000 for a pair of VIP foursomes.

For the first four years of the golf tournament, from 2007 to 2010, the total expenses averaged about $50,000, according to the tax filings. But in 2011, things took a turn. Costs for Eric Trump's tournament jumped from $46,000 to $142,000, according to the foundation's IRS filings. Why would the price of the tournament suddenly triple in one year?

"In the early years, they weren't being billed [for the club]--the bills would just disappear," says Ian Gillule, who served as membership and marketing director at Trump National Westchester during two stints from 2006 to 2015 and witnessed how Donald Trump reacted to the tournament's economics.

"Mr. Trump had a cow. He flipped. He was like, 'We're donating all of this stuff, and there's no paper trail? No credit?' And he went nuts. He said, 'I don't care if it's my son or not--everybody gets billed.' "


Stop stealin from your old man and pay the **** up, boy.
revelette1
 
  6  
Tue 6 Jun, 2017 02:39 pm
The tone conservative and pundits are taking on the tragic terrorist event in London can be properly placed on Trump's head. They just follow their leader in whatever he does.

By politicizing terror, Trump picked the wrong approach to global crisis (The Hill)

Quote:
After last weekend's attack in London, President Trump decided to criticize London Mayor Sadiq Khan on Twitter, and use the tragic event for his own political agenda. Most world leaders expressed sorrow, support and sympathy for the United Kingdom as they condemned the attacks. Trump, on the other hand, tried to use it as leverage for his keystone election promise: the "travel ban."

The president was heavily criticized for mischaracterizing Mayor Khan's remarks on Twitter, saying that, "At least 7 dead and 48 wounded in terror attack and Mayor of London says there is 'no reason to be alarmed!'" Mayor Khan's actual remarks did not refer to the actual terror attack, and instead to the increased police presence in London.

At least 7 dead and 48 wounded in terror attack and Mayor of London says there is "no reason to be alarmed!"
- Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 4, 2017

Khan's office responded with the statement: The mayor had "more important things to do than respond to Donald Trump's ill-informed tweet."

When tragic events occur, it is often difficult for world leaders and prominent figures to craft a perfect, non-clich d response that makes everyone happy.

However, instead of letting the dust settle, President Trump chose to continue the argument, tweeting: "Pathetic excuse by London Mayor Sadiq Khan who had to think fast on his 'no reason to be alarmed' statement."

Pathetic excuse by London Mayor Sadiq Khan who had to think fast on his "no reason to be alarmed" statement. MSM is working hard to sell it!
Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 5, 2017

Trump also used the horrific incident to attack political correctness as it pertained to his "travel ban," tweeting that "We must stop being politically correct and get down to the business of security for our people. If we don't get smart it will only get worse."

Trump's first tweet after the attack was more sympathetic, saying: "Whatever the United States can do to help out in London and the U. K., we will be there - WE ARE WITH YOU. GOD BLESS!"

Unfortunately, this side of President Trump is both rarely seen and bogged down by his unnecessary and often inappropriate tweets. After this attack in London, Trump's publicizing and sensationalizing the threat of terrorism is becoming more apparent.

Whatever the United States can do to help out in London and the U.K., we will be there - WE ARE WITH YOU. GOD BLESS!
- Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 3, 2017

Instead of using this political attention and news cycle to promote unity between the world's religions or propose and promote effective anti-terrorism policies, Trump decided to blatantly mischaracterize this terror attack to advance his domestic political agenda and broadly target the religion of Islam.

This is certainly not the only time that Donald Trump has mixed political aims and the fight against terrorism. Trump has threatened "sanctuary cities," which limit local cooperation with immigration authorities, by insisting he will cut off federal funding. New York City, for instance, would lose $190 million in Homeland Security funding.

Brooklyn Councilman Stephen Levin had this to say about the potential loss of funds: "I just want [to] make it clear...that the potential impact to New York City could be very, very devastating when it comes to counterterrorism funds. It would make New Yorkers less safe, it would make Americans less safe. We attract people from all over the world to this city."

Instead of constructing and lobbying for effective immigration and anti-radicalization policies, President Trump continues to take the route of punishing and blaming individual Muslims and Islam as a whole, which directly contributes to the schism that serves the cause of ISIS and Al Qaeda.

I, like all Americans should, want Donald Trump to succeed in addressing the threat of terrorism. He has already shown his ability to negotiate defense deals that benefit our security and the American people, specifically, on his recent trip to the Middle East.

However, in terrorists' minds, the goal of their attacks in major Western cities is to create fear and divide people. Unfortunately, Trump's rhetoric is only helping that mission.

His specific refutation of Mayor Khan's comments does not show a desire to heal and unify. The divisiveness he displays instead makes us weaker in the face of terrorism, not stronger.
revelette1
 
  6  
Tue 6 Jun, 2017 02:42 pm
@layman,
Oh, the irony, layman.

Trump Foundation diverted $100K in donations meant for charity: report (The Hill)

Quote:
According to the Forbes report, $100,000 of the donations was funneled through the Eric Trump Foundation back into Trump's golf courses for expenses incurred during the tournaments, despite donors being told that all their money would be used for charity.

In addition, more than $500,000 of donors' money over 10 years was re-donated to other charities, including some that were connected to Trump family members. At least four of those organizations also used Trump golf courses for charity tournaments.

According to the report, President Trump himself gave the order for the Trump Organization to begin billing the Eric Trump Foundation for hundreds of thousands of dollars.
layman
 
  -3  
Tue 6 Jun, 2017 02:44 pm
@layman,
Actually, Trump just wanted a paper trail, not the money (which didn't go to him anyway, just his charitable foundation). He didn't take anything, he gave the money back.

Quote:
Shortly before the spike in costs, the Donald J. Trump Foundation donated $100,000 to the Eric Trump Foundation--a gift explicitly made, according to Gillule, to offset the increased budget. Thus, the Eric Trump donors were still seeing their money go to work for kids along the same lines as previous years.
layman
 
  -3  
Tue 6 Jun, 2017 02:46 pm
@revelette1,
See my last post, Rev.

Quote:
the Donald J. Trump Foundation donated $100,000 to the Eric Trump Foundation--a gift explicitly made, according to Gillule, to offset the increased budget.


Just a standard "fake news" hatchet job by cheese-eaters, that's all.

Wise up, Girl.
revelette1
 
  5  
Tue 6 Jun, 2017 02:48 pm
@layman,
The money went to his golf courses for expenses, not any paper trail, actual money.
revelette1
 
  6  
Tue 6 Jun, 2017 02:49 pm
@layman,
It is from The Hill, not a liberal source.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -3  
Tue 6 Jun, 2017 02:54 pm
@revelette1,
Yeah, so? Getting reimbursed for value given is some kinda crime now, that the idea?

Like if I sell my $500 guitar to some guy for $500, then I have cheated him and stolen his mony?
layman
 
  -3  
Tue 6 Jun, 2017 03:01 pm
@layman,
layman wrote:
Just a standard "fake news" hatchet job by cheese-eaters, that's all.
Wise up, Girl.

Trump put something like $75 million of his own, personal, money into his campaign. But all the MSM would ever report was that a small portion of that was used by the campaign to pay the fair market value for use of hotel rooms he owned.

Anything to make it "sound" like he's taking money when he's actually giving it, eh?
0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  5  
Tue 6 Jun, 2017 03:09 pm
@layman,
Regardless of whether you think Trump should have been reimbursed, Trump misrepresented how the money would be dispersed. The people donating the money were told all of itwould be going to charity. As we see in the report, it was not the case. Trump's foundation is still being investigated because of practices such as the one described.
oralloy
 
  -4  
Tue 6 Jun, 2017 03:11 pm
@revelette1,
revelette1 wrote:
The tone conservative and pundits are taking on the tragic terrorist event in London can be properly placed on Trump's head. They just follow their leader in whatever he does.

Trump is right to point out that we need to protect ourselves before the terrorists strike here again.

The Left doesn't like him saying this because they are on the same side as the terrorists.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -2  
Tue 6 Jun, 2017 03:17 pm
@revelette1,
Quote:
Trump misrepresented how the money would be dispersed. The people donating the money were told all of itwould be going to charity.


Wrong again.

Your selective quote from the Hill:

revelette1 wrote:
According to the Forbes report, $100,000 of the donations was funneled through the Eric Trump Foundation back into Trump's golf courses for expenses incurred during the tournaments, despite donors being told that all their money would be used for charity.


But, as was also reported by Forbes in that very same article (but omitted):

Quote:
Shortly before the spike in costs, the Donald J. Trump Foundation donated $100,000 to the Eric Trump Foundation--a gift explicitly made, according to Gillule, to offset the increased budget. Thus, the Eric Trump donors were still seeing their money go to work for kids along the same lines as previous years.


The charitable recipients (the "cancer patients") did not receive a nickel less, the money was not "stolen" from them, and the donors were not being misled in the least.

Wise up, Girl.
layman
 
  -1  
Tue 6 Jun, 2017 03:31 pm
@layman,
I mean, like, suppose I let my son live rent-free in a house I own for many years. Then I decide, that for accounting purposes, etc., it would be better if he paid for his use.

So I agree to "sell" it to him for $100,000. But I give him $100,000 to pay for it before the "sale" goes through. I've really fucked that poor boy over, right, Rev?

Trump gets audited by the IRS every single year, he says. He has a team of tax experts a mile long preparing his returns. If there was something "improper" about any of this, they wouldn' have allowed it (their ass would be on the line, if they did).
0 Replies
 
camlok
 
  -1  
Tue 6 Jun, 2017 03:31 pm
@layman,
Quote:
The FBI, like all Americans, never had any intention of "prosecuting" Bin Laden. They were determined to cap his sorry ass on sight, that's all.


And you have capped your reputation as an insufferable liar who will say anything, weave the nuttiest lies, just to get yourself out of your self induced jams.

So now all Americans a group that hates a fundamental principle of the US, the rule of law.

With all the lies you tell you ought get get of your shovel and get yourself a trackhoe.

Quote:
That death warrant was eventually executed, notwithstanding Obama's objections to it.


You just got thru lying about how "all Americans" blah blah blah. Keep on diggin', layman.
camlok
 
  -1  
Tue 6 Jun, 2017 03:33 pm
@snood,
I thought that you were smarter than to tie your wagon to Izzy and his nutty notions, Snood.
0 Replies
 
ossobucotemp
 
  2  
Tue 6 Jun, 2017 03:33 pm
Rest period now (in other words, an osso tangent):

I just found out that General Flynn doesn't like Colin Kaepernick, a person I like from afar; this is not immediately Trump related, just a few comments re him if you read the text. I am guessing Kaepernick doesn't play golf, at least not on a Trump course. He'd probably be great at it if he does play.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/is-this-mike-flynns-secret-twitter-account-5


I also recently read that Sadiq Kahn wants to cancel any trip there to England by Trump (not in that same article). Hmm. The porridge thickens.
layman
 
  -1  
Tue 6 Jun, 2017 03:39 pm
@camlok,
Quote:
So now all Americans a group that hates a fundamental principle of the US, the rule of law.


Nice try, cheese-eater.

"U.S laws" don't apply to foreign enemies who are trying to kill you on a battlefield during war.

They don't get "trials," they get their ass smoked, that's all.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  0  
Tue 6 Jun, 2017 03:47 pm
@maporsche,
No I mean sometimes when the "opposition" fails the nation suffers and that shouldn't be something to wish for.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  0  
Tue 6 Jun, 2017 03:50 pm
@ossobucotemp,
ossobucotemp wrote:

I also recently read that Sadiq Kahn wants to cancel any trip there to England by Trump (not in that same article). Hmm. The porridge thickens.


Now see this is the sort of the thing that would make me not like him. If it has to do with his religion, only he knows and I don't care.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.77 seconds on 11/25/2024 at 12:49:25