@blatham,
Precisely how are the Republicans
working so hard to obstruct investigations into the Russian's attempts to
manipulate the 2016 election?
Prominent Republicans, including the chairs of the investigating committees and sub-committees have all acknowledged the efforts took place. Is refusal to blindly accept that they succeeded constitute obstruction in your mind?
The Democrats started out assuming that the Russians won Trump the presidency and have been working very hard, ever since, to prove that assumption; littering the political landscape with wild claims and innuendo, but I suppose that's simply evidence of rectitude, since we all know the assumption to be correct.
Sounds like you're preparing the field for the arrival of a bad outcome:
no compelling evidence of collusion
Of course that phrase alone is intended to hedge your bet so that you can, at a later date, declare there was plenty of evidence found but none of it rose to the high standard of "compelling" and thus Mueller wasn't
forced to indict and the House wasn't
forced to impeach. I fully expect a post from you somewhere down the line where you indict the Republicans for moral corruption based on the fact that they refused to do the right thing in the face of evidence that was only slight less than
compelling, because, after all, morally upright people don't wait, until they have no other choice, before they do the right thing.