@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
So he's asking them to lie, or drop the investigation. You can't have it both ways, there's enough evidence, hearsay or circumstantial, to warrant an investigation and until the investigation is concluded they don't know.
What Trump did was highly questionable at the very least, then you add both his and Flynn's lies into the mix, Trump's cackhanded attempts to shut down the investigation, Comey's sacking, Flynn cowering behind the 5th amendment and Trump whining about being persecuted, you'd have to be lacking a sense of smell not to conclude that something stinks big time.
Well, clearly he didn't ask them to drop the investigation. At least not based on any of the allegations from unconfirmed sources. If you know otherwise, provide us with evidence.
He only "lied" if there is evidence that he did collude with the Russians and I know that you don't have any such proof, because no one does.
So we are left with you distorting the facts to serve the narrative you and the Opposition want to advance.
I'm not trying to have it anyway but truthful.
The investigation should proceed, but only ideological assholes have determined what the result of the investigation will, beforehand, be.
Fortunately, in this country at least, innuendo and the sense of smell of partisans, doesn't get people convicted.
If you believe he's guilty that's fine. You are under no obligation to offer proof for your opinions. If you can't (and you can't) then very few people will or should buy your nonsense, but in any case neither your opinion nor any other in this forum can convict anyone, let alone the president of the United States.
