1
   

Am I crazy or is porn OK?

 
 
PamO
 
  1  
Reply Sat 2 Oct, 2004 08:25 pm
heh heh. Smile

i was serious tho.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Apr, 2005 09:13 am
ehBeth wrote:
Grand Duke - porn has changed a lot over the last 20 - 30 years. The industry has recognized the large female market, and is targeting it.

Have you read any of the Nancy Friday collections of womens fantasies? I've noticed a lot of her work makes men uneasy. I've got some theories about why that's the case, but I'll save 'em for now.

Women have been writing and creating porn for hundreds of years. Thousands if you count some of the extremely explicit Indian carvings done by women.


An interesting book on the subject.

http://www.nyupress.org/product_info.php?products_id=1347

Over the course of these same twenty-five years, there has been a proliferation of sexually explicit materials geared toward women, made available in increasingly mainstream venues. In asking "what is the relationship of women to pornography?" Juffer maintains that we need to stop obsessing over pornography's transgressive aspects, and start focusing on the place of porn and erotica in women's everyday lives. Where, she asks, do women routinely find it, for how much, and how is it circulated and consumed within the home? How is this circulation and consumption shaped by the different marketing categories that attempt to distinguish erotica from porn, such as women's literary erotica and sexual self-help videos for couples?

<snip>

In her pursuit to understand what women like and how they get it, Juffer delves into adult cable channels, erotic literary anthologies, sex therapy guides, cyberporn, masturbation, and sex toys, showing the varying degrees to which these materials have been domesticated for home consumption.

Representing the next generation of scholarship on pornography, At Home with Pornography will transform our understanding of women's everyday sexuality.



more on the history of erotic works
gotta love aldaily, they review everything

http://service.spiegel.de/cache/international/spiegel/0,1518,druck-350042,00.html



Quote:
New pornographic figurines from the Stone Age have been discovered in Germany. But researchers can't agree on what the 7,000-year-old sculptures mean. Were our ancestors uninhibited sex fiends, or was reproduction strictly controlled to improve mobility? An increasing number of finds seem to indicate the Stone Age was an orgy of sexual imagination.

The project itself was far from extraordinary. Workers near the Eastern German city of Leipzig were digging a ditch for a new gas line. Hum drum. But what they discovered was far from routine. A backhoe unearthed a 7,200-year-old, Stone Age garbage pit -- and it was filled with refuse from some of the first farmers on the European continent. Moreover, upon rushing to the site, archeologists discovered an 8.2 centimeter (3.2 inches) clay torso buried underground. The legs, abdomen and head were missing, but, according to the lucky archeologists, the figure still had its most important features intact: a "well-shaped behind" and a "short, but impressive" penis.

Since its discovery on August 19, 2003, the partially intact "Adonis from Chernitz" -- as it has been dubbed -- has been creating quite a stir at the state office of archeology in Dresden. Sculptors have carefully recreated the curve of the figure's buttocks and other anatomical minutiae are also clearly visible. Archeologist Harald Staeuble is amazed at the detail.

He's not the only one. The find is clearly a remarkable one -- and is the oldest clay figure ever found anywhere in the world.

And the project is becoming ever more fascinating as archeologists continue uncovering additional fragments while sifting through the Stone Age garbage pit. One fragment, which extends from the left calf to the pelvis, appears to be part of a female statue; Adonis, apparently, had a girlfriend. In fact, in an article soon to be published in the journal Germania, Staeuble speculates on how the pieces could fit together. He writes that "there is strong evidence that this is a copulation scene."

According to Staeuble, the fragments show that the man was standing with his pelvis at a slight angle. The woman in front of him was bent forward, almost at a 90-degree angle. Another indication that the two figures belong together is the fact that they are both made to the same scale -- both figures were originally just under 30 centimeters (11.7 inches) tall.

The only depictions of sexual activity known until now were Greek paintings, but they were created more than 4,000 years later. Given this enormous difference in time, the Saxony find has created some confusion. Some believe it was a toy. Archäo, a professional journal, speculates that it may have been "chic" to display these types of sculptures in the "houses of the first farmers between the Saale and Elbe rivers." Researchers speculate that the figure could also be evidence of a "fertility cult" -- a theory that sounds as straightforward as it is vague.


interesting article
0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Apr, 2005 09:31 am
I saw that. I've got aldaily as my home page.

What a great A2K thread...it brought back fond memories. Cav and Bi Bear. And where's PamO?
Never see Frank anymore or Princess P. Seems a little drabber around here.
0 Replies
 
smog
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Apr, 2005 10:11 am
panzade wrote:
I saw that. I've got aldaily as my home page.

While I don't have it as my home page, I've had it at the top of my favorite places ever since you (and maybe BPB?) first mentioned it.

Oh, and porn rocks, just so I stay on-topic.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Apr, 2005 10:21 am
It was/is a great thread.
ALDaily - now there is diversity of thought :wink:
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Apr, 2005 10:49 am
panzade wrote:
I saw that. I've got aldaily as my home page.

What a great A2K thread...it brought back fond memories. Cav and Bi Bear. And where's PamO?
Never see Frank anymore or Princess P. Seems a little drabber around here.


Oh yeah!

Well here I am.

Not sure what I said on this subject earlier...but my take is that I am much, much more bothered by people who get all up tight about porn than I am by people who enjoy it.

And I think the latter is a much healthier attitude than the former.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 May, 2005 05:14 pm
And now I've met Frank - and I love more about him than just our agreement in discussions about porn Cool
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 05/18/2024 at 03:15:04