I still think the northeast is blue
Maybe blue as in sad? Nah, we are evil. Evil people aren't sad.
hint: blue states and red states
Could be some green states - white states? Maybe Libertarian, gotta win the state first!
c.i., this goes back to both of us believe strongly - we need more viable parties. We don't have a democracy - we have a biocracy. And, they won't let any other political organization even get a viable foothold.
There isn't enough difference between either of the two parties to be a valid choice anyway. They're both bought out by corporations and the rich, we should actually have a diversity requirement for the Senate and House. How to make it happen?
Yessir, Bill. You've got that right.
It's almost a joke you know; both Bill and Hill are making millions - those "poor" liberals. I wonder what their tax bill looks like?
c.i.
Nancy Pelosi - worth $92M.... Some Democrat.
So, cjhsa, you don't think having a bunch of bucks and being intelligent go together?
Especially since they 'sacrificed' themselves for government service. When anybody 'sacrifices' themselves for ten-twenty years of government service, and becomes multi-millionaires, sacrifice doesn't seem to fit the bill. c.i.
Sacrifice is losing three limbs for your country - despicable is the Republican party:
http://www.ajc.com/news/content/news/0603/14cleland.html
Quote:To Cleland, defeat as painful as war injuries
"It was like the trauma of being suddenly and traumatically blown up, and I in effect relived all that hell of 35 years ago," Cleland said in an exclusive interview from his new office at Washington's American University. "It's been very tough to recover."
..
With a snicker, he added, "In my case, it turned out it didn't matter what I said or what I did with my vote. The president came after me, anyway," he said, referring to President Bush's five trips to Georgia to boost Chambliss' campaign.
The lowest moment for Cleland came when Chambliss aired a TV spot that attacked his voting record on homeland security issues and featured photos of Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein.
Cleland said at the time he was personally hurt by the ad, and during the interview this week he remained bitter.
"The charge that somehow I was unpatriotic, when really I had helped write the law on the homeland security legislation, all those lies that occurred in the campaign -- that was a trauma that was unexpected for me," he said. "I thought I had done a good job for the people of Georgia. I thought they knew me as someone who had served and sacrificed for the country, as someone who was willing to defend the country 35 years ago. . . . But the White House and the media image makers turned me into some kind of villain."
Anytime ya got a $92M woman telling you you're wealthy if you make more than $40K/year, there's something wrong with the picture.
All Democrats do this, and it's a easy generalization to make.
cjhsa wrote:Anytime ya got a $92M woman telling you you're wealthy if you make more than $40K/year, there's something wrong with the picture.
All Democrats do this, and it's a easy generalization to make.
A fully self contained hypocrisy by a neo-con, wow - it's a beaut, not less than three as I see it!
Yeah right pinhead. Explain away.
Comon, explain where the hypocrisy is in my statement, except for in the point it makes?
