0
   

Let's talk about replacing GWBush in 2004.

 
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Jun, 2003 06:00 pm
Anybody in the pentagon understand the half life of radiation? c.i.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Jun, 2003 06:00 pm
PDid, I agree with that assessment; that the US is the most dangerous power that ever existed on the face of the earth. We all understand the reasons why; this administration has lost control of common sense. Even with "smart bombs," over three thousand Iraqi's were killed to go after one man, Saddam. c.i.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Jun, 2003 06:00 pm
2 or 3 weeks, isn't it? After all, we're now slim, trim and highly mobile - in other words, fast!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jun, 2003 12:05 pm
http://enemyoftheearth.org/cartoons/pantsonfire.jpg
0 Replies
 
Tartarin
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jun, 2003 12:40 pm
Front page, Washington Post, today:

Former Aide Takes Aim at War on Terror By Laura Blumenfeld
Washington Post Staff Writer

Monday, June 16, 2003

Five days before the war began in Iraq, as President Bush prepared to raise the terrorism threat level to orange, a top White House counterterrorism adviser unlocked the steel door to his office, an intelligence vault secured by an electronic keypad, a combination lock and an alarm. He sat down and turned to his inbox.

"Things were dicey," said Rand Beers, recalling the stack of classified reports about plots to shoot, bomb, burn and poison Americans. He stared at the color-coded threats for five minutes. Then he called his wife: I'm quitting.

Beers's resignation surprised Washington, but what he did next was even more astounding. Eight weeks after leaving the Bush White House, he volunteered as national security adviser for Sen. John F. Kerry (Mass.), a Democratic candidate for president, in a campaign to oust his former boss. All of which points to a question: What does this intelligence insider know?

"The administration wasn't matching its deeds to its words in the war on terrorism. They're making us less secure, not more secure," said Beers, who until now has remained largely silent about leaving his National Security Council job as special assistant to the president for combating terrorism. "As an insider, I saw the things that weren't being done. And the longer I sat and watched, the more concerned I became, until I got up and walked out."....

* * *

Into this tricky intersection of terrorism, policy and politics steps Beers, a lifelong bureaucrat, unassuming and tight-lipped until now. He is an unlikely insurgent. He served on the NSC under Presidents Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton and the current Bush. The oath of office hangs on the wall by his bed; he tears up when he watches "The West Wing." Yet Beers decided that he wanted out, and he is offering a rare glimpse in. ...

* * *

When Beers joined the White House counterterrorism team last August, the unit had suffered several abrupt departures. People had warned him the job was impossible, but Beers was upbeat. On Reagan's NSC staff, he had replaced Oliver North as director for counterterrorism and counternarcotics, known as the "office of drugs and thugs."...

* * *

"Randy's your model government worker," said Wendy Chamberlin, a U.S. Agency for International Development administrator for Iraq, who worked with Beers on counterterrorism on the NSC of the first Bush administration. "He works for the common good of the American people. He's fair, balanced, honest. No one ever gets hurt feelings hearing the truth from Randy."...


http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A62941-2003Jun15?language=printer
0 Replies
 
GreenEyes
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jun, 2003 12:51 pm
Hmmm... wonder what he didn't agree with?
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 Jun, 2003 12:54 am


New York Times
0 Replies
 
Tartarin
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 Jun, 2003 08:57 am
Yesterday, picking up some stuff at a laundry in town, I got into a conversation with a small hotel owner, avowed Republican. Quite an interesting conversation. But germane to this particular discussion was his horror of "the Northeast," where all bad things start "and California," he added after a pause. Bush's accent, of course, changes depending on who he's talking to, what his mission is. It's now admitted that many of his gaffes were planned PRECISELY in order to rope in the center of the country which doesn't want its pols to be smart-ass Harvard types who know how to pronounce the names of foreigners. What this says about our country -- and its fat middle -- doesn't do it much credit.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 Jun, 2003 09:12 am
Tartarin

Excellent piece from the WP! thank you
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 Jun, 2003 09:36 am
Ah, yes, the evil northeast. Not many people realize it, but Hitler was born in massachusets. About 3 doors down from the Kennedy compound... SARS was first spotted in Vermont, near a popular ski area...
0 Replies
 
GreenEyes
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 Jun, 2003 09:52 am
When in doubt... blame New England... we are the axis of all evil!
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 Jun, 2003 10:21 am
Hmmmm, we could invade on the 4th and have it won by the 12th and occupied by the end of July. Not a bad idea!
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 Jun, 2003 10:27 am
BillW, Before you attempt anything against Boston, you'd better make sure there's no Paul Revere. Wink c.i.
0 Replies
 
Tartarin
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 Jun, 2003 10:28 am
If you get a chance, listen to Charles Lewis of the Center for Public Integrity being interviewed today on Fresh Air (npr.org) about the deep corruption particularly with respect to officials/defense industry. He lays it out clearly, in detail.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 Jun, 2003 10:28 am
If I'm not mistaken, we already occupy the Northeast, don't we? Shocked
0 Replies
 
GreenEyes
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 Jun, 2003 10:40 am
Civil War Part II?
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 Jun, 2003 11:00 am
I think it is still blue!
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 Jun, 2003 11:36 am
Is GWBush beatable in 2004? That is the main question of this forum - I think, or I thought. ;( c.i.
0 Replies
 
GreenEyes
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 Jun, 2003 11:38 am
cicerone imposter wrote:
Is GWBush beatable in 2004? That is the main question of this forum - I think, or I thought. ;( c.i.



You are absolutely correct... we will try not go off track again!
0 Replies
 
Tartarin
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 Jun, 2003 11:39 am
For sure. We just need to do it. One goes for the jugular, another for the eyeballs. We know where the weak points are.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 07/08/2025 at 03:00:01