blacksmithn wrote:I ignore no fact. I ignore a baseless supposition.
The inspectors were, in fact, forced to leave Iraq because WE were about to attack. As for total disclosure, well Saddam claimed repeatedly to have no WMDs, turning over documents which purported to explain their disposition and allowing said inspections. History has shown who exactly was right and wrong on that issue, at the unfortunate cost of 1000 American lives, untold Iraqi casualties and billions in taxpayer funds pissed away without cause.
If you ignore no fact,then these reports should interest you...
http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/meast/9812/16/iraq.strike/
Butler's report discussed events that had taken place since mid-November, when Baghdad last agreed to cooperate fully with U.N. Special Commission (UNSCOM) inspectors.
"Iraq's conduct ensured that no progress was able to be made in either the fields of disarmament or accounting for its prohibited weapons programs," the report said.
Butler late Tuesday ordered UNSCOM staff out of Baghdad. The entire staff was evacuated before dawn on Wednesday.
"I regret that I had to report the facts yesterday, which is that (unfettered access) had not been given, and we can't adequately do our jobs under these circumstances," Butler told reporters at the United Nations on Wednesday.
Notice the date...December 16, 1998
Clinton was president.
http://www.iraqwatch.org/bulletins/vol1iss2may02.htm
Read that article,it supports what I said also.
If you would do a little work,you would see that the inspectors were FORCED OUT by Iraq in 1995.That was after the gulf war,and long before we thought about invading.
So,your argument doesnt hold water.