@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:Yes, it is interesting (the excerpts that is) and it makes sense.
Yes, that's why I posted it . . .
Quote:There is a place for federal ownership of land, but it must be for specified purposes and not for indefinite periods.
Why are you repeating what the contents of the link I have already provided have stated?
Quote:(I would think that anything and everything the federal government does should be guided by the requirement that it must serve the interest of the entire country)
Yes, that, too, was in the linked material I provided.
Quote:
Of course we have been, much to our own peril, moving steadily away from the Founder's wise and prudent concerns over a federal leviathan, largely because such a governmental beast is necessary to advance progressive precepts.
Could you please provide some examples of the progressive precepts of which you speak that require a governmental beast?
Quote:Left to the States, massive pockets of injustice and inequity would exist throughout the nation, and a mere pittance, if anything, would be spent on the disadvantaged.
Could you explain how you came to this conclusion?
Quote:It is also interesting how the Founders notion that the government could never be trusted, but the people, generally, always should be, has, after a little less than 240 years, been completely turned on its head.
Explain.