25
   

Regarding the Attacks in Paris:

 
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Nov, 2015 03:47 am
@izzythepush,
Quote:
The main difference between IS and the Tea Party is that IS is mostly made up of young impressionable people, but the Tea Party is full of people old enough to know better.


That some statement even for a asshole such as yourself as off hand I do not remember any tea party person cutting people heads offs or calling for let alone doing mass murders of innocents unless you are going to try to sell the idea that such lone wolves nuts as Eric Robert Rudolph or ‎Timothy McVeigh was tea parry members in good standings who actions/murders happen to predate the very existence of the tea party.

My cute little English guy while the tea party members are right wing nuts they are not the same as ISIS members.
hawkeye10
 
  0  
Reply Sun 22 Nov, 2015 04:16 am
Quote:
The U.S. won’t in any circumstances agree to a political settlement for the civil war in Syria that leaves Assad in power because he’s lost all legitimacy, Obama said. As long as Assad stays there is no way to unite the country’s various factions for the fight against Islamic State.

More from Bloomberg.com: Republicans Accuse Obama of Going Soft on the Islamic State

“It would not work to keep him in power,’’ Obama said at a news conference Sunday in Kuala Lumpur. “This is a practical issue, not just a matter of conscience.’’

There is an increasing awareness on the Putin’s part that the extremist group is a much bigger threat to Russia than losing an embattled ally in Assad or anything else in the region, Obama said.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/obama-firm-ousting-assad-says-084432291.html

The Prick says as he knows that Hollande is coming to see him in a couple of days to talk about this very subject. If I were Hollande I would say **** Obama, and throw in with Putin and Iran to go against Daesh. The US has been useless on this for years anyways, and it probably will not change till Obama is replaced.

0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  3  
Reply Sun 22 Nov, 2015 04:18 am
@BillRM,
You've got teabaggers like Layboy talking about nuking all Moslems and you're too stupid to see the obvious parallels. Your Dubya did more damage than a thousand ISes.
izzythepush
 
  3  
Reply Sun 22 Nov, 2015 04:27 am
@layman,
Says the lickspittle who quotes Goebbels and is currently pissing his pants over what happened the other side of the Atlantic. You can't get more cowardly and fascistic than that. Spare a thought for the decent Americans who don't wish to be associated with garbage like you.
izzythepush
 
  4  
Reply Sun 22 Nov, 2015 04:29 am
@layman,
What would you know about enquiring minds? You need a mind for that, and you've fallen at the first hurdle.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  0  
Reply Sun 22 Nov, 2015 05:44 am
@izzythepush,
Dizzy-boy, ya sho nuff aint got no game. Lawd only knows why ya think yo a playa.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Sun 22 Nov, 2015 06:02 am
@layman,
God only knows why you think anybody gives a monkeys. You're a complete fake, and a racist, bigoted, fuckwitted fake to boot. Your antics may go down well in Pigfuck central, but not when you have to deal with human beings.
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Sun 22 Nov, 2015 08:38 am
@izzythepush,
Quote:
You've got teabaggers like Layboy talking about nuking all Moslems


Unless all Muslims are members of ISIS I had no desire to killed all Muslims and had stated over and over that of the three main religions Islam is if anything have a history of being more peaceful then the other two.

In history when Christians was killings Jews in large numbers in Europe the Ottoman Empire.offer shelter to them.

An no one in power in the tea party movement is talking about mass killings of Muslims that I am aware of.unlike ISIS desires toward all non-Muslims.
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Nov, 2015 09:57 am
@izzythepush,
Probably not in the hotel room.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  0  
Reply Sun 22 Nov, 2015 12:33 pm
@BillRM,
You don't seem to have any desire not to see all Moslems nuked either.
layman
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 22 Nov, 2015 01:29 pm
@izzythepush,
Quote:
You're a complete fake, and a racist, bigoted, fuckwitted fake to boot.


Keep tellin me what I is, eh, Dizzy? That way I learn more about you all the time.

Lemme ax ya: Is I a fake racist, ya figure? Just how "complete" is alla that there fraud, I wonder?

BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Sun 22 Nov, 2015 03:30 pm
@izzythepush,
Quote:
You don't seem to have any desire not to see all Moslems nuked either.


That desire only exist in your very very sick mind.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2015 02:33 am
@BillRM,
When you dodge the question it's very obvious, as is the reason why. Most of the time you talk gibberish, don't try banter, you only look more of a slobbering cretin.
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2015 02:52 am
@izzythepush,
As I stated your comments concerning others posters here are not only without any foundation in reality but also revealed a very sick mind indeed.

I am surprise that the UK NHS is not knocking on your door to get you into one of their mental health programs, even given their fundings cut backs of late.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2015 04:14 am
@layman,
izzythepush, bobsal, and glitterbag are best just put on ignore.

The only thing any of them ever do is spout name-calling, so no one will actually miss anything by blocking them out.

If their name-calling breaks through ignore, instead of responding in kind, it is better to submit an abuse report.

If everyone keeps returning fire against the name-callers, pretty soon the moderators will start suspending people again. It's not worth it.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2015 04:24 am
@oralloy,
Quote:
If everyone keeps returning fire against the name-callers, pretty soon the moderators will start suspending people again.

But it will not be you unless you do it wrong.

Quote:
It's not worth it.
Sure it is, with a little bit of work we could turn this into a nifty club house, and all the cool kids would come. We would even get some of those great people who left a few years ago back....they pop in and say that they miss their old A2K, they would find out that it is great again, trust me.
Finn dAbuzz
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2015 03:03 pm
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:

izzythepush, bobsal, and glitterbag are best just put on ignore.

The only thing any of them ever do is spout name-calling, so no one will actually miss anything by blocking them out.

If their name-calling breaks through ignore, instead of responding in kind, it is better to submit an abuse report.

If everyone keeps returning fire against the name-callers, pretty soon the moderators will start suspending people again. It's not worth it.


izzy yes, the others no
hingehead
 
  3  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2015 08:06 pm
Found this via twitter - presentation based on the analysis of the demographic data we have of the radicalised 'islamists'

https://life.eui.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/OLIVIER-ROY-what-is-a-radical-islamist.pdf

Really interesting. Particularly his conclusions about religion's centrality to radicalisation. Hint: not much. It's really just an excuse. These knobends have little interest in their religion, or those who practice it, even those born into it reject their families and other muslims. Converts see the religion as a vehicle to 'exact revenge' on a world that 'frustrates and isolates them'.

So basically very big babies with weapons.


Quote:
Nevertheless frustration and resentment against society seems to be the only “psychological” trait that is regularly shared. Psychologists that study
radicalisation (Fethi Benslama in France) detect a psychological (not psychiatric) state of “suffering”, a discrepancy between their expectations
and their social outcome, a need of recognition, in a word a narcissist crisis, which makes them more open to either nihilism or to the narrative of heroism that Al Qaeda or Daesh offer to them.

The religious dimension offers them a framework of personal re-structuration: the truth, the good, a clear set of norms, brothers in arms, a clear objective, and salvation, although the latter is not necessarily understood in terms of the paradise as described in the Koran. In fact few of them speak explicitly about paradise.

The nihilist dimension (revenge, suicide) seems to supersede the utopian one (to build a new and just society). Radicals are neither happy nor funny
people.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2015 10:45 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Finn dAbuzz wrote:
oralloy wrote:
izzythepush, bobsal, and glitterbag are best just put on ignore.

The only thing any of them ever do is spout name-calling, so no one will actually miss anything by blocking them out.

If their name-calling breaks through ignore, instead of responding in kind, it is better to submit an abuse report.

If everyone keeps returning fire against the name-callers, pretty soon the moderators will start suspending people again. It's not worth it.

izzy yes, the others no

Bobsal and glitterbag also offer nothing but grotesque namecalling.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2015 10:46 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:
But it will not be you unless you do it wrong.

The difference between "right retaliation" and "wrong retaliation" is a subtlety that I'm probably not capable of pulling off.


hawkeye10 wrote:
Sure it is, with a little bit of work we could turn this into a nifty club house, and all the cool kids would come. We would even get some of those great people who left a few years ago back....they pop in and say that they miss their old A2K, they would find out that it is great again, trust me.

I don't know that a "club that would attract cool people" sounds too appealing, but it would be nice to bring back the intellectuals.

But I don't perceive any way of getting rid of the namecallers other than putting them on ignore.
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 09:45:42