@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:Remember, its a "well regulated" not a "Well armed" militia. We already limit ownership of severl types of weapons and the district courts have upheld that.
The term "well regulated militia" meant that the militia in question had trained enough that they were capable of fighting as a single coordinated unit instead of fighting as a bunch of uncoordinated individuals.
The purpose of the second half of the Second Amendment is to ensure the militia's unfettered access to advanced armaments.
No court has ever issued a ruling limiting the weapons of the militia, and no court ever will. Rulings dealing with non-militiamen are entirely different.
The only real limit is that the Second Amendment only covers individual weapons. Tanks and fighter jets aren't covered.