@Debra Law,
You understand very little . Are you sure you know what I am proposing ? You have created both sides of the argument and found in your favour . That is delusional . Would it be alright with you if I told you what I am proposing ? I hope it doesnt affect your argument...
I was proposing (events have overtaken it) a compromise in that the full legal rights of heterosexual marriage be applied to homosexual unions, we just find a different name for it because it is the name that is creating the divisiveness . Of course arrogance and stupidity won the day . Who wants to compromise when you have a cause that makes you feel powerful and righteous . People like you just want to push others around, carrying on with bullshit about slavery . Really ? How dare you compare homosexuality with slavery ! You are truely an obnoxious desperate character .
Quote:you might of said the same thing to proponents of equal civil rights for our nation's black citizens
My service in helping black people pisses all over yours so dont get uppity with me .
Quote: An online urban online dictionary
Ok, Ok, I get it already..it was online...gees ! You would have done better to use a real dictionary :
Quote:De facto (/dɨ ˈfæktoʊ/, /deɪ-/, Latin: [deː ˈfaktoː]) is a Latin expression that means "in fact, in reality, in actual existence, force, or possession, as a matter of fact" (literally "from fact").
They are also known as common law marriages, defacto relationships, domestic relationships, close personal relationships, and domestic partnerships to name a few . The original concept of a "common-law marriage" is a marriage that is considered valid by both partners, but has not been formally recorded with a state or religious registry, or celebrated in a formal religious service . In effect, the act of the couple representing themselves to others as being married, and organizing their relation as if they were married, acts as the evidence that they are married . Your choice of a definition was silly and self serving .
