@neologist,
neologist wrote:
FBM wrote:He's just describing the god of the gaps fallacy. What's wrong with that?
Nothing.
But god of the gaps is strictly non sequitur:
Mom says "Who spilled milk on the floor?"
Junior says "I dunno. Dog did it"
But a family would already know whether or not they have a dog. If the kid says, 'If you don't know, then there must be an invisible dog in the house that did it,' then we're looking at a god of the gaps-type claim.
Tyson didn't say anything out of line, as far as I can tell, and I don't see how it's a
non sequitur in the context he was discussing.