When will Hillary Clinton give up her candidacy ?

In the normal course of events you are right, but if everyone's real worst nightmare comes true and Trump is president, who knows how it will end up. Trump demoted his main guy in his campaign, but he didn't get rid of him. He has lots of ties to Putin/Russia and took money in bribes in Ukraine. As for Stein, she went to some celebratory dinner in Russia in 2015 really trashing the US while saying nothing about Russia abuses of the press and gays.

Hopefully Hillary will be president, I am little worried because apparently the documents FBI had are going to be released so then we will have rehash a lot of information and it might bring her numbers down.

WE CAN ONLY HOPE.

The FBI declined to comment for this story.

The bureau has come under fire for its decision to turn anything over to Congress — a highly unusual step that the agency said is “consistent with our commitment to transparency with respect to the FBI’s investigation of former Secretary of State Clinton’s use of a personal email server.”

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) said in a statement, “This will neither serve the interests of justice nor aid Congress in its responsibilities and will merely set a precedent for the FBI to turn over closed case files whenever one party in Congress does not like a prosecutorial decision.

This has been done in the name of transparency, but as this precedent chills the cooperation of other witnesses in the future, I suspect the Department of Justice will later come to refer to it by a different name – mistake.”

Brian Fallon, a spokesman for Clinton’s campaign, said the handing over of documents was “an extraordinarily rare step that was sought solely by Republicans for the purposes of further second-guessing the career professionals at the FBI.” But he added that “if these materials are going to be shared outside the Justice Department, they should be released widely so that the public can see them for themselves, rather than allow Republicans to mischaracterize them through selective, partisan leaks.”

Rep. Jason Chaffetz, who has been among the legislators aggressively pushing for more information on the Clinton case, said Wednesday, “Clearly, there are things that could and should be made public. Even [Clinton is] asking for that.” But he added that his staff would look at the materials inside the secure facility to prevent leaks.

giujohn wrote:

WE CAN ONLY HOPE.

....that Hillary will be president. Glad you're on board guijohn

Don't worry about this Rev. If the FBI after 18 months of investigation couldn't find anything then neither will Congress.

This was going to stay in the news all election cycle no matter what. Nothing new here.

What it will do, is cause the public to be sick and tired of rehashing the same old tripe and it'll increase the resolve of Clinton supporters, independents, and probably a few republicans who are sick and tired of this game as well (and who can't stomach voting for Trump). Or it will boost the campaign of Gary Johnson which will also result in a Hillary victory.

Nothing new. Nothing to worry about.

As part of his trip to Argentina, President Obama co-hosted a press conference yesterday with President Mauricio Macri, and a reporter asked about the “optics” of Obama continuing with his schedule in the wake of the terrorist attack in Brussels. The American leader’s response raised some eyebrows.

“Groups like ISIL can’t destroy us, they can’t defeat us. They don’t produce anything. They’re not an existential threat to us. They are vicious killers and murderers who perverted one of the world’s great religions.

“And their primary power, in addition to killing innocent lives, is to strike fear in our societies, to disrupt our societies, so that the effect cascades from an explosion or an attack by a semi-automatic rifle.”

The president went on to explain that he believes in reminding terrorists about the weakness by rejecting their efforts to change how we live.

But for some on the right, there was an important problem. What does Obama mean ISIS isn’t “an existential threat”? How could he possibly say that?

I get the sense that there’s some confusion about the meaning of the word “existential,” so let’s take a moment to clarify. It refers to our existence – an existential threat is a threat that puts our existence in jeopardy. If, for example, a killer points a loaded gun at someone, the person at the other end of the barrel is facing an existential threat because the gunman might kill them.

ISIS is obviously dangerous and capable of deadly acts of terrorism, but to see these terrorists as an existential threat to our entire country is ridiculous. Not to put too fine a point on this, but the United States is a profoundly strong country, with the largest economy and largest military on the planet. ISIS, meanwhile, is a death cult with guns, suicide vests, and delusions of grandeur packaged in an effective online media operation.

As we’ve seen too often, ISIS militants kill innocents indiscriminately, and efforts to destroy the network must obviously continue. But to believe ISIS is an existential threat is to believe that the terrorists may succeed in eliminating the United States altogether. Our whole country will simply be wiped from the map.

And that’s bonkers. You can agree or disagree with the president’s decision to stick to his schedule, and attend diplomatic and social events abroad, but Obama’s assessment of the kind of threat ISIS poses to the United States was clearly correct.

Please spend millions of dollars

You're right, he's infallible. How could I be so wrong about him?

You assertion that the FBI didn't find anything is simply false.

They didn't find anything prosecute-able.