When will Hillary Clinton give up her candidacy ?

A longtime aide to New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R) told CNN on Tuesday that she plans to vote for Hillary Clinton, telling the network that for Republicans coping with Donald Trump "silence isn't an option."

This article highlights a heavyweight new player in conservative politics – the recently expanded “Koch network” – that coordinates big money funders and an integrated set of political organizations operating to the right of the Republican Party. As we will show, the rise of the Koch network may help to explain the increasingly extreme economic positions espoused by most GOP candidates and officeholders.

By now it has been established that Clinton did not comply with the letter of the law, though she thought her Email security setup did.

Regardless, the whole reason we have any type of national security setup at all is primarily to prevent Russia, the second largest military power in the world, from gaining an advantage on us which they will immediately turn into putting those Eastern European countries they held in subjugation until 1991 back into subjugation. That's over 100 Million people.

With Trump talking about disbanding NATO and letting Eastern and Western Europe stand undefended against Russian forces moving back in, talking about whether the evidence is sufficient that Hillary's Email server was hacked by Russians doesn't make much sense. Trump wants to turn all of Eastern, and possibly Western, Europe over to the Russians-that's our national security threat right there, not stupid Emails.

You are a living example of the episode in Seinfeld's "Bizzaro World." Where up is down and out is in.

It's completely logical to hold positions of a) hating the DNC, b) wanting Trump to lose, and c) voting for Clinton to bring about said Trump loss.
THAT is brave.

She might have believed that she was complying with federal law. But the way she avoided having the State Department vet her settup shows she had an idea that she was violating State Department internal policy.

Other than their ICBMs Russia isn't that potent of a force. Their threat to their neighbors was because their neighbors had no defenses at all. Now that we are stationing NATO forces in the Baltics the threat is pretty much over.

He is suggesting that America can't afford to keep being the world's global policeman, and that we need curtail our military presence in the world and have our allies start helping out in keeping the world an orderly place.

The way he's talking do you think Trump would go along with consenting to NATO troops in the Baltics? His answer would be, "We can't afford this any longer, what the **** did Estonia ever do for us? Let Putin have 'em all if he wants them. They're his problem."

Trump's position is not just unreasonable, a few years ago it would have been considered treason by many. At any rate, a guy who talks like Trump does on this issue can't be let anywhere near the Oval Office.

During a rally for Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump in Ashburn, Virginia on Tuesday, a school-aged boy shouted “take the bitch down” in an apparent reference to Democratic presidential rival Hillary Clinton.

Responding to a group of reporters sitting nearby, the child’s mother, who identified herself as Pam Kohler, defended her child’s “right to speak what he wants to,” noting that “he’s a minor so he can’t be interviewed.” When asked about his behavior, Kohler blamed “Democratic schools” for her child’s lewd language, the Los Angeles Times reported."

The NATO troops in the Baltics aren't American though. This is what Trump actually wants to see: other NATO partners stepping up to shoulder more of the burden.

It's not what I prefer, but a reduced American role in the world isn't unreasonable. Lot's of people like the idea.