When will Hillary Clinton give up her candidacy ?

Breitbart News has generated a lot of the angst and hate directed at me in the past number of months, with the Trump cult of personality being led to take all sorts of actions. Without a doubt, the several times Breitbart has declared me an enemy of Trumpism or mischaracterized my statements to be pro-Clinton there is a direct correlation to the wave of hate directed at my radio station. The latest wave began three days ago.

I cannot imagine Breitbart News does not realize it. I suspect they relish the fact that Trump fans who read the site are showing up on people’s doorsteps and harassing employers to fire employees. In my opinion, the site has become, intentionally or not, the digital Joseph Goebbels of the Trump movement, running a propaganda campaign masquerading as news.

Take samples and test. There is a known error curve (increasing over time) in carbon dating but that error curve is known, from tree ring tests. And given that some trees, like California's bristlecone pine can live 5000 years,

the fact is that unless the network itself is continuously and actively monitored there is generally no evidence left behind in a successful hacking.

We are left then with the question of what might be the likelihood that a successful hacking of an unsecured private network of a sitting Secretary of State occurred over a nearly four year period,

Sooooo, knowing the age of a living tree gives credibility to a test on the breakdown of carbon molecules in fossils and rock structures dating sometimes millions of years?

When the animal or plant dies, it stops exchanging carbon with its environment, and from that point onwards the amount of 14
C it contains begins to decrease as the 14
C undergoes radioactive decay. Measuring the amount of 14
C in a sample from a dead plant or animal such as a piece of wood or a fragment of bone provides information that can be used to calculate when the animal or plant died. The older a sample is, the less 14
C there is to be detected, and because the half-life of 14
C (the period of time after which half of a given sample will have decayed) is about 5,730 years, the oldest dates that can be reliably measured by radiocarbon dating are around 50,000 years ago, although special preparation methods occasionally permit dating of older samples.

So you attempt to argue that Carbon dating is wrong because it can't be used on rocks and fossils millions of years old. Meanwhile Carbon dating says that it can't test those things.

Never read Builder's posts

If Al Gore gets the Electoral College,

The rest of the world knows that it matters very much who wins in November,

Are you starting to use equivalence arguments yourself?

The editorial position of the New Yorker magazine is as well defdined (though different) as that of the National Review, and I think you know that.

It’s hard to know exactly when the Republican Party assumed the mantle of the “stupid party.”

Stupidity is not an accusation that could be hurled against such prominent early Republicans as Abraham Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, Elihu Root and Charles Evans Hughes. But by the 1950s, it had become an established shibboleth that the “eggheads” were for Adlai Stevenson and the “boobs” for Dwight D. Eisenhower — a view endorsed by Richard Hofstadter’s 1963 book “Anti-Intellectualism in American Life,” which contrasted Stevenson, “a politician of uncommon mind and style, whose appeal to intellectuals overshadowed anything in recent history,” with Eisenhower — “conventional in mind, relatively inarticulate.” The John F. Kennedy presidency, with its glittering court of Camelot, cemented the impression that it was the Democrats who represented the thinking men and women of America.

Rather than run away from the anti-intellectual label, Republicans embraced it for their own political purposes.