When will Hillary Clinton give up her candidacy ?

@glitterbag,

Quote:

I contemplated your wise council....

Very good, that's all I needed to know.

Carry on, grasshopper.

0 Replies

@glitterbag,

It's much less headachy with Builder on ignore. Just sayin'.

2 Replies

@snood,

She's just testing out her typos; no harm done.

0 Replies

@snood,

snood wrote:

It's much less headachy with Builder on ignore. Just sayin'.

Come on Snood, the kid amuses me.

0 Replies

@parados,

Quote:

Clinton AND others were careless -

He said extremely careless. Don't you deluded arrogant assholes ever get tired of supporting a corrupt piece of **** like Clinton?

5 Replies

@cermak,

Welcome to A2k, from me and all the other arrogant deluded assholes.

1 Reply

@glitterbag,

I want an answer, not a welcome.

1 Reply

@cermak,

Wow, you actually thought I was offering you a welcome? I gave you my answer, I shouldn't have included all the other arrogant deluded assholes. Not all of the ADA's support Hillary, some are Bernie supporters. I don't think we have many low brow, underachieving humps with a chip on their shoulder who support Trump. Are you a Trump supporter, Skippy. God knows they need all the help they can get.

1 Reply

@cermak,

cermak wrote:

Quote:
Clinton AND others were careless -

He said extremely careless. Don't you deluded arrogant assholes ever get tired of supporting a corrupt piece of **** like Clinton?

Hey buddy, you haven't been here long. Don't you think you might want to take it a little slow with the profane insults?

0 Replies

@glitterbag,

A live one, GB. Came in guns a blazin'. Seems familiar though. Might be a sneaker.

1 Reply

@snood,

Yep, I think he/she has been here before using a different name.

1 Reply

@glitterbag,

Best batten the hatches, and toss out some storm drogues.

Might be a wise move. Rolling Eyes

0 Replies

@cermak,

cermak wrote:

Quote:
Clinton AND others were careless -

He said extremely careless. Don't you deluded arrogant assholes ever get tired of supporting a corrupt piece of **** like Clinton?

There's got to be a diagnosis for this phenomenon: going to humiliating lengths to deny the overwhelming facts in your stupid face to continue to support Hillary Clinton.

"Deluded arrogant assholes" sounds right.

0 Replies

@cermak,

I didn't realize Clinton sent all those emails to herself and then responded to herself. Clearly I was mistaken and it was ALL Clinton's doing in your fantasy world.

1 Reply

@parados,

The people who sent her communication trusted that the goddam Secty of State was following security protocol. The people who stripped security restrictions off of emails did so at Hillary's command.

Why do you support her in her crimes? You know she's guilty. What's in it for you? She got away with scamming the American public again. She and her husband are above the law thanks to people like you. Do you think you and your children are going to benefit from that?

What are you thinking??

1 Reply

@Lash,

Quote:

The people who sent her communication trusted that the goddam Secty of State was following security protocol. The people who stripped security restrictions off of emails did so at Hillary's command.

It's funny how you know things the FBI investigation didn't find.

If anyone actually stripped security restrictions from a document that would have met the standard that Comey said wasn't met. But amazingly, Comey didn't charge anyone with something he didn't have evidence you seem to think exists.

1 Reply

@parados,

Oh they know it. You do too. We all know it.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/265367-clinton-defends-telling-aid-to-send-data-through-nonsecure-channel

The only thing we don't know is why you're her sycophant. What's in it for you?

1 Reply

@Lash,

Actually, you don't know ****.

Quote:

Clinton on Sunday defended her actions and said the talking points were “never sent” in a non-secure fashion.

Quote:

State Department spokesman John Kirby said officials see no indication the document was ever sent to the email account Clinton used, which was hosted on a private server.

“We did do some forensics on that and found no evidence it was actually emailed to her,” Kirby said at a daily news briefing on Friday. “We have found no indication that the document was emailed to former Secretary Clinton. There are other ways it could have found its way to her for her use.”

Kirby also said the fact that the talking points were initially set to be sent via a secure system did not necessarily mean they were classified.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/hillary-clinton-emails-nonsecure-gop-217510#ixzz4Dizgt7VK
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook

Now.... tell us about this email you have in your possession that contains classified information but the State Department and the FBI have never seen.

1 Reply

54% of Rasmussen polled respondents think Hillary Clinton should have been indicted.

http://m.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/july_2016/most_disagree_with_decision_not_to_indict_clinton

I'm not sure her skating out of accountability once again will ensure she's coronated at the convention. People are furious.

0 Replies

@engineer,

Quote:

They didn't even conclude she was "negligent" which is the standard for charges.

Your correct. The term used was "extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.". .. or Gross negligence.

I am glad you are happy to support her and I expect your trust her to protect sensitive information in the future. I am happy you admit you will support a liar as your CIC. You will get the Govt you deserve.

1 Reply

When will Hillary Clinton give up her candidacy ?

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know