When will Hillary Clinton give up her candidacy ?

@Lash,

There won't be a contested convention.

@Lash,

The superdelegates are Democratic Party insiders, and Hillary is an insider. Frankly, I don't see the superdelegates going to Bernie even if he pulls even, or even just a touch ahead. He'd really have to move ahead to take the superdelegates.

Not to mention, to have Hillary ahead of the elected delegates and then give it to Bernie because of "momentum" or some other reason will drive black voters from the party.

1 Reply

@Blickers,

The school of thought to answer your comment on how Bernie could get superdelegates focuses on voters in each state pressuring the superdelegates to respect the will of the people in the state who voted for Bernie.

Threaten their mealtickets, and suddenly opposing Hillary isn't so scary.

Is it a shoe-in? No.

Can it happen? Oh yes. Look at the miracles that've happened already around Bernie's candidacy.

It's not about Hillary "giving" anything to him. It's about Bernie's people taking it from elitist superdelegates who locked in with Hillary before they even knew Bernie was in the race without a thought to the will of their voting constituents. They'll be tracking money changing hands among these lobbyist "superdelegates" and other "politicians."

Where would the black voters go?

0 Replies

https://scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/13173740_10206369464660745_2565197869235071222_n.jpg?oh=1eda4a01c51283bab3445ab77c8dc5a4&oe=57A31CA4

2 Replies

@Lash,

Thank goodness. The Hillary Email Imbroglio may have just broken open. We'll see who else picks up the story.

Looks legit.

I think she's in trouble.

...and his name is Guccifer. *snort*

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/05/04/romanian-hacker-guccifer-breached-clinton-server-it-was-easy.html

0 Replies

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/hacker-guccifer-i-got-inside-hillary-clinton-s-server-n568206

...and the thunder rolls....

1 Reply

@Lash,

...and the lightening strikes.

http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/report-hacker-extradition-to-u-s-connected-to-clinton-fbi-email-probe/

Extradicted to answer questions about Hill's fun with unsecured state secrets.

2 Replies

@Lash,

Quote:

Extradicted to answer questions about Hill's fun with unsecured state secrets.

Given the long long list of government secrets that was under government control that gotten out having her mail server in a boom closet might had been the safest place for it.

0 Replies

@Lash,

Quote the article:

Quote:

When pressed by NBC News, Lazar, 44, could provide no documentation to back up his claims, nor did he ever release anything on-line supporting his allegations, as he had frequently done with past hacks. The FBI's review of the Clinton server logs showed no sign of hacking, according to a source familiar with the case.

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz........

2 Replies

@Blickers,

Blickers wrote:

Quote the article:

Quote:
When pressed by NBC News, Lazar, 44, could provide no documentation to back up his claims, nor did he ever release anything on-line supporting his allegations, as he had frequently done with past hacks. The FBI's review of the Clinton server logs showed no sign of hacking, according to a source familiar with the case.

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz........

Yeah, she posts bullshit like that in spam-like sequences with comments like "Hillary's in big trouble!". It would be funny as hell if it wasn't pathetic and creepy.

3 Replies

@snood,

Quote snood:

Quote:

Yeah, she posts bullshit like that in spam-like sequences with comments like "Hillary's in big trouble!". It would be funny as hell if it wasn't pathetic and creepy.

Yes, she really gives any article a big buildup, even if nothing is there.

0 Replies

@snood,

Only the weak-minded can get so gleeful and hopeful about the possible destruction of someone they don't know. There are plenty of blogs and of course the National Enquirer that is skilled weaving outrageous false facts into their rag. Not to forget all the sleaze buckets anxious to polish lies and slurs scandleous enough to shock folks and also bolster the fears of those who don't follow the newspapers, who are identical to the uneducated/clueless/and the folks who don't let the truth spoil their hate parties because its so much more fun to play cops and robbers and hate those who might belong to a different party.
They don't even care if its true or not as long as it makes he other guy look bad.

When it's proven not true, these low-lifes ignore it and just pray their sleazy butts off that another one of the lowlifes they admire will invent another batch of lies they can crow and cackle about. Now thats worth a big frosty snort.

2 Replies

@snood,

Spoken like a true Clinton apologist. God, you people must be so tired.

1 Reply

@glitterbag,

It's leading the NEWS, gasbag.

0 Replies

@Lash,

Lash wrote:

Spoken like a true Clinton apologist. God, you people must be so tired.

You know you've been working twice as hard to tear her down as any of us have to defend her. Well you would know that, if you were sane.

1 Reply

@snood,

I'm reporting NEWS. Why defend her? Call CNN with your defense.

0 Replies

For people who don't understand the term neoliberalism and wonder why it is starting to be seen frequently as a descriptor for their political candidate and the Democrat party, this is an easily understood Salon article.

http://www.salon.com/2016/04/30/clintonism_screwed_the_democrats_how_bill_hillary_and_the_democratic_leadership_council_gutted_progressivism/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=socialflow

When will Hillary Clinton give up her candidacy ?

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know