@snood,
snood wrote:
ehBeth wrote:
If you think maporsche thinks Mr. Sanders is a saint of any sort you haven't been reading his posts.
I was responding specifically to the statement "Bernie doesn't care about his chances to win (or words to that effect)"
IMO, The only person who at this stage of a campaign didn't care about their chances would be a selfless saint whose efforts were all "for the people".
Do you see the potential confusion you might engender by speaking for maporsche? If he has issue with what I say to/about him, don't you see the good sense in letting him be the one who says it? Can't maporsche most effectively clear up any misconceptions I or anyone has about maporsche?
I was sort of taken off guard snood.
My statement was meant in a joking manner (especially the hit piece part).
Even if taken literally though, making that statement wouldn't justify the response you made towards me (even if you'd forgotten that you and I have been pretty much in agreement on most of this Clinton/Sanders stuff). And I don't mean from an 'attacking' standpoint, but the content of your post doesn't make sense.
I said this: "Bernie Sanders does not care about his chance of winning the election."
You replied with this: "Geez, you really think this guy is a saint, don't you? No ambition, no ego, no human weakness? Why in the hell wouldn't he care about his chances? Because he does it all for his fellow man?"
It just doesn't fit.