When will Hillary Clinton give up her candidacy ?

*sigh* is right

I guess my apologies for not remembering over the course of 60+ posts between 5-10 different people across 5 different threads that you're Canadian and can't vote in the US elections.

Maybe you can overlook that oversight and focus on the larger point that I was making. Just replace "vote" with "support" and you got the idea, didn't you?

There was a typo in one of my last posts too, maybe you should devote some energy on pointing that out. You know, important stuff.

I tend to see the "battery" re candidates, who is for insulting whom, as similar if not equal - but some of all of that comes from multiply repetitive insulters over a fairly long stretch of time now; also, vacillating over time, re who is doing it more.

This, today, interests me -

A Slate article on an interviews that made the author question whether the poll about 1/3 of Bernie supporters not voting for Hillary if nominee is really the situation -

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2016/03/24/bernie_sanders_supporters_in_la_say_they_ll_back_clinton.html

I see more pro-Hillary posts here. But who's counting?


Alright then, go fight the invasion of the nasty hashtags if you think you must. Still, my advice is to keep it suave. Otherwise, chances are you will look just as crazy as they do... :-)

Obviously not you.

It's not the first time. You're not paying attention. I guess talking to your sockpuppets is super important stuff for you, but listening to others isn't.

Edit: FYI, I'm French, not Canadian.

I don't count the small beans.

There were plenty of similar articles to choose from saying the same thing.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-goodman/as-long-as-hillary-clinto_b_9571406.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/what-if-clinton-isnt-indicted/2016/03/29/81a1033e-f5d7-11e5-8b23-538270a1ca31_story.html
http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/267083-tom-delay-feds-ready-to-indict-clinton

Are ALL of these papers suspect? Does reading ALL of these papers make the reader rightwing?

Or does SAYING that make YOU in psychotic denial about Hillary Clinton's reality right now?

It's funny to see how Democrats can't deal with realistic criticism of Hillary Clinton in any way other than a desperate claim that the critic is a rightwing nut. You will see that the corruption of Clinton has chased many Democrats to the Independent and Green parties - or just to the non-engaged periphery of politics....and Bernie Sanders has lured them back in.

Hillary sucks ass as a candidate and a human. You don't have to be rightwing to see that. What's blocking your clear vision?

Hillary's lies: http://www.politifact.com/personalities/hillary-clinton/statements/byruling/false/

Thanks, CI.
Politifact listed 22 outright lies. (And this is only during part of this campaign...)

As a matter of fact, all politicians lie. It's only a matter of degree.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/13/opinion/campaign-stops/all-politicians-lie-some-lie-more-than-others.html?_r=0

Quote Lash:


Is Newsmax a website for right wing nut cases? Yes.

Is Tom DeLay a disgraced House Whip who can be expected to try to make things worse for the possible Democratic nominee? Yes.

Is Steve Malzberg a right wing lunatic who calls Ellen DeGeneres "Ellen Degenerate" because she came out as gay? Yes.

You're parading yourself as a converted conservative who is now so progressive that she can't bear voting for Hillary, (even though most Republicans consider her the strongest candidate), and when you attack Hillary, what do you do?

Quote Newsmax. Who quotes Tom DeLay. On the Steve Malzberg Show.

Your credibility is zero.

Right now, because Tom DeLay is speaking out about his friends in the FBI who have told him inside info on the Clinton email imbroglio, everybody is quoting Tom DeLay.

If he's lying about this information, it should come out soon.

Uh Oh. Well, we may as well hear about this now... Sounds like the shyt might be getting ready to hit the fan.

The FBI investigation of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has entered a new phase. Direct evidence of a cover up has been discovered in her emails.
Clinton Investigation Reveals a Devastating Cover Up

http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/3/31/1508655/-Clinton-Investigation-Reveals-a-Devistating-Cover-Up

It's also 5pm some place. Time for a drink.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-dem-primary-live-updates-and-results/2016/03/milwaukee-journal-sentinel-criticizes-hillary-clinton-221390

Largest circulation newspaper in Wisconsin crushes Hillary.
______________________________________
Excerpt from Wisconsin paper:
"Public officials keep secrets because they have something to hide — something they don't want the people they are supposed to be serving to know anything about," the board wrote, then referring to Clinton's paid speeches to Wall Street investment firms.
The paid speeches have been a sticking point in her battle with Bernie Sanders, who has repeatedly called on Clinton to release the transcripts of those speeches. Clinton has vowed to do so but only as long as all other candidates do the same.
"Clinton has a long track record of public service but an equally long record of obfuscation, secrecy and working in the shadows to boost her power and further her ambition," the board concluded. "We encourage voters to think long and hard about that record when choosing the next president."


Read more: http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-dem-primary-live-updates-and-results/2016/03/milwaukee-journal-sentinel-criticizes-hillary-clinton-221390#ixzz44WVB438k
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook

Oh, so more baseless attacks based ENTIRELY on speculation.

More of the same from you.

No. That was from the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel. I just shared it.
So: More of the same from the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, LOL!!!

Not only a cover up but I'll bet it has been ongoing one since she was first lady.

For something like this she needs to be tortured by having her fingernails filed and painted with a scarlet paint of some kind she can't wash off with water.

It's definitely a clear indicator of her low character and nefarious motives.