80
   

When will Hillary Clinton give up her candidacy ?

 
 
Lash
 
  1  
Tue 5 Jan, 2016 06:48 pm
@revelette2,
I hear that, but I haven't even heard Trump dirt - and there has to be volumes.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Tue 5 Jan, 2016 08:27 pm
On claims of a crumbling Obama economy...

Auto industry reports highest annual sales ever in 2015, eclipsing past record set in 2000.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Tue 5 Jan, 2016 08:53 pm
@blatham,
What's more amazing is the simple fact that the US economy is stable and growing at about 1.7% while the rest of the world struggles - including Japan and Europe.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Tue 5 Jan, 2016 08:54 pm
After McCain lost his election attempt, Sarah Palin famously quit her governorship with a typically incoherent speech. It really wasn't difficult to discern what she was up to. That would have entailed work with a much diminished public profile and not a lot of recompense. Far, far better to join the long line of rightwing con-men and women who set their sights on soaking up money from gullible conservatives (see here http://thebaffler.com/salvos/the-long-con ).

And how did she do? Here's her pad in Scottsdale http://bit.ly/1TDpxtb
0 Replies
 
17j
 
  -1  
Tue 5 Jan, 2016 09:07 pm
@blatham,
Quote:
And folks on the right are now generally so locked into the closed universe of their own media system, they really don't have a clue about how this is going to fail them again. That will seem incomprehensible to them.


Is that anything like terrorism, Muslims and national security to the left?


They are in a fantasy land.
blatham
 
  5  
Tue 5 Jan, 2016 09:17 pm
@17j,
I'm sorry. Your question or assertion is unclear. Could you please rephrase as a coherent question or thesis.
17j
 
  -2  
Tue 5 Jan, 2016 09:29 pm
@blatham,
Quote:
Your question or assertion is unclear.


No, it is not. You just have no answer that suits your agenda.
blatham
 
  3  
Tue 5 Jan, 2016 10:24 pm
@17j,
No, really. I'll be quite happy to respond if you clarify your question or thesis. I'll do so as carefully as I'm able.

Or, I could put you on ignore. Your choice.
17j
 
  0  
Tue 5 Jan, 2016 10:58 pm
@blatham,
Quote:
Or, I could put you on ignore. Your choice.


Wrong again. It is your choice. Why would I change anything for you to read my posts. You should get over yourself.
roger
 
  3  
Wed 6 Jan, 2016 12:40 am
@17j,
Strictly speaking, it is our choice. Keep us laughing if you want to keep your audience.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  2  
Wed 6 Jan, 2016 05:13 am
Done.
roger
 
  1  
Wed 6 Jan, 2016 05:19 am
@blatham,
Guess he wasn't funny enough?
blatham
 
  1  
Wed 6 Jan, 2016 11:31 am
@roger,
A tad shy of the mark.
0 Replies
 
revelette2
 
  1  
Wed 6 Jan, 2016 04:57 pm
OK, I read about Broaddrick , and I tell you, the whole story sounds illogical. Look how long Bill Clinton kept silent to Hillary about Monica Lewinski. Why in the world would he have told Hillary about raping Broaddrick? Then Hillary supposedly acknowledging the rape charge by thanking Broaddrick for keeping silent? It makes no sense whatsoever. Hillary wouldn't do it in a million years.

The rape allegation against Bill Clinton, explained
georgeob1
 
  1  
Thu 7 Jan, 2016 12:57 pm
@revelette2,
Apart from what has already been widely reported, I don't claim any particular knowledge about what may have gone on between the Clintons. However, my experience in life very strongly suggests she very likely knew about her husbands proclivities to at least a substantial degree. The public record of her statements discrediting several of his accusers is also quite clear. Together this is not necessasarily a discredit to her in any way. However, it certainly does suggest a rather cynical degree of hypocrist behind her contrived and grossly exaggerated claims of a protracted "war on women" on the part of those who oppose her political ambitions.
blueveinedthrobber
 
  3  
Thu 7 Jan, 2016 07:59 pm
@georgeob1,
georgeob1 wrote:

Apart from what has already been widely reported, I don't claim any particular knowledge about what may have gone on between the Clintons. However, my experience in life very strongly suggests she very likely knew about her husbands proclivities to at least a substantial degree. The public record of her statements discrediting several of his accusers is also quite clear. Together this is not necessasarily a discredit to her in any way. However, it certainly does suggest a rather cynical degree of hypocrist behind her contrived and grossly exaggerated claims of a protracted "war on women" on the part of those who oppose her political ambitions.


I disagree. If she was the videographer at Bill's alleged affairs that doesn't dilute, eliminate or refute the very real war on women.
Lash
 
  0  
Fri 8 Jan, 2016 03:16 am
@blueveinedthrobber,
It makes a lie of her alleged role in that war - if she vilified women he raped and sexually assaulted. And she did.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  -1  
Fri 8 Jan, 2016 03:48 am
Looks like we'll be hearing a lot from Clinton victims. I predict a Cosby-like Avalanche, unless they prefer to get paid off by the Clinton Machine.

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/264988-bill-clinton-rape-accuser-hillary-tried-to-silence-me#
Blickers
 
  3  
Fri 8 Jan, 2016 08:59 am
@Lash,
Oh, please, everyone knew about Juanita Broaddrick back in 1999. The alleged incident/infidelity, (on both sides) occurred when people were listening to ABBA on the radio. It isn't going to work. Of course, that won't prevent the Right from trying.
revelette2
 
  1  
Fri 8 Jan, 2016 09:43 am
@Lash,
It is so obvious, most people are going to see right through it, including GOP women.

GOP women urge Trump to drop talk of Bill Clinton sex scandals
Quote:

Republican women have a message for Donald Trump: Enough with Bill Clinton’s sex scandals.

It’s not that they’re waving Trump off the issue to help Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton. On the contrary, they’re worried that the more Trump talks about a troubled period of the Clintons’ marital history, the more likely it could backfire and rally independent and even some Republican women to the side of the former first lady.

GOP officials have mapped out a series of general election attacks on Clinton centered on her record as secretary of State, but that case could become harder to make if the debate is saturated by talk of 1990s-era sex scandals.

I’m uncomfortable with it, I just am,” Dwight said, adding that she particularly didn't like a candidate discussing it.

“She was as aghast by her husband’s behavior as the rest of us," she said of Clinton. The Democratic front-runner has "a ton of trip-ups” that’ll be ignored if Bill Clinton's past becomes a dominant theme.

“It’s a distraction,” said Donna Sytek, a former speaker of the New Hampshire House of Representatives and former state GOP chair. “We should be talking about the debt and security and any number of other things,” she said. “The women I know that are politically active are going to try to ignore it and encourage their candidates to talk about the larger issues."

On Fox News over the weekend, Trump said Clinton was not an “innocent victim” and “would go along with him” in her husband’s extramarital activities. Though his comments turn off some, they do resonate with some of his core supporters.

He should drag her through the mud,” said Ellen Voss, 55, a Trump supporter in North Carolina. “The Republicans need to fight brutal, dirty and pull no punches.”

It's the latest example of Trump helping his primary campaign while hurting the party in the long term, said Katie Packer, a Republican strategist who advises Republican candidates on messaging to women.

Packer's company, Burning Glass Consulting, has conducted a series of focus groups and polling in competitive general election states showing the issue is a political "minefield" for the party in a general election. Trump's campaign did not respond to requests for comment.


Why do you not come out of closet and admit this whole Bernie thing you been doing has just been one big con. I give you credit for thinking it up, it works as a great cover for you to go after Hillary while claiming to be a "progressive."
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

The Pro Hillary Thread - Discussion by snood
get this woman out of my view/politics - Discussion by ossobuco
Hillary Clinton hospitalized - Discussion by jcboy
Has Hillary's Time Come? - Discussion by Phoenix32890
I WANT HILLARY TO RUN IN 2012 - Discussion by farmerman
Hillary's The Secretary Of State..It's Official - Discussion by Bi-Polar Bear
Hillary the "JOKESTER"?? - Discussion by woiyo
Hillary Rebuked by Iraqi Leader - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.12 seconds on 11/16/2024 at 10:33:41