80
   

When will Hillary Clinton give up her candidacy ?

 
 
Frank Apisa
 
  5  
Sat 21 Nov, 2015 08:42 am
@Lash,
Lash wrote:

Actually, not one of you thinks I'm deceptive or a phony.


Oh, I definitely do. I am almost certain you are deceptive and phony.

Quote:
You just hate that your disgusting behavior has been called out - and there are many members who take great delight in it. You just can't handle the truth.


MY disgusting behavior???

You have savaged Hillary Clinton. YOUR behavior is disgusting
.

Quote:
How can you care so little for your country to give the keys to a corrupt machine that is stealing all of us blind?


She must have stolen your husband.

Too bad that.

Get over it.


Quote:
You are culpable.


No, I am Frank Apisa.
Lash
 
  0  
Sat 21 Nov, 2015 08:59 am
@Frank Apisa,
Hillary Clinton savaged this country. I'm only calling attention to her behavior.

You don't insult me - but you do insult all women - when you make your small-minded misogynistic claim that the only reason a woman would disapprove Hillary Clinton is over a man. You prove with that crass, 1950s weaselly comment that you think woman are second-class citizens with a man-centered decision-making process.

Your outrageous misogyny smacks of the old boys snickering in the country club locker room over those they deem less-than.

Nice of you to trot out your true colors.
Baldimo
 
  0  
Sat 21 Nov, 2015 09:50 am
@izzythepush,
It's only circular because you keep repeating the same lies over and over again as if they are truth. You can't even get the issue correct. I never claimed you changed my posts, I claimed you deleted your own. That was the issue, not that you changed mine. There were no misleading statements about myself and you can't even prove it with posts because they all point back to you doing a bad copy and paste of my statements. The points were clear, you muddied the waters with lies and hatchet jobs on what was actually said.

This will continue until you can be honest. Since we know you can't be honest, this will be on going for some time to come.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  3  
Sat 21 Nov, 2015 10:08 am
@Lash,
Lash wrote:

Hillary Clinton savaged this country. I'm only calling attention to her behavior.

You don't insult me - but you do insult all women - when you make your small-minded misogynistic claim that the only reason a woman would disapprove Hillary Clinton is over a man. You prove with that crass, 1950s weaselly comment that you think woman are second-class citizens with a man-centered decision-making process.

Your outrageous misogyny smacks of the old boys snickering in the country club locker room over those they deem less-than.

Nice of you to trot out your true colors.


Hillary Clinton did not savage this country.

You are a disgrace to womanhood...and should never give lectures on misogyny. I have been an advocate for women's rights LONG before it became something men did.

In any case, I am not opposed to your obnoxious behavior because you are a woman...but because you are a human...and capable of much better. At least, I suppose you are capable of it...but I might be wrong.


revelette2
 
  5  
Sat 21 Nov, 2015 10:13 am
Poll: Clinton opens 25-point lead over Sanders
Quote:

Hillary Clinton surged to a 25-point lead over Bernie Sanders in the latest Bloomberg Politics national poll out Friday, as the former secretary of state continues to solidify her advantage among the Democratic base.

Clinton grabbed 55 percent, while Sanders took 30 percent. Former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley polled within the 5-point margin of error with 3 percent, while 8 percent said they were not sure and 4 percent said they were uncommitted.


Roughly six in 10 of the Democrats surveyed, however — 62 percent — said that they could still be persuaded on their choice for the nomination, while 37 percent said their mind is made up. Among Clinton supporters, 46 percent said they are set on their decision, while 54 percent said they could be persuaded. But among Sanders supporters, just 36 percent said they are decided and 64 percent could be persuaded in another direction.

Asked to answer a series of 15 questions about the candidate's qualities, those surveyed gave Clinton an advantage in 11, including on foreign policy, gun control and life experience. Voters preferred Sanders on issues related to reining in Wall Street, honesty and trustworthiness.

In the previous iteration of the survey conducted in September, Clinton picked up 33 percent to Sanders’ 24 percent, while Vice President Joe Biden, who has since ruled out a presidential run, earned 25 percent.

The poll was conducted Nov. 15-17 by Selzer & Co. of Des Moines, surveying 385 Democrats or Democratic leaners, with a margin of error of plus or minus 5 percentage points.


On the question of the thread, I don't think she will any time soon.

Frank Apisa
 
  5  
Sat 21 Nov, 2015 10:21 am
@revelette2,
I agree.

Hillary is not a quitter. Neither is Bernie Sanders, in my opinion.

They will battle it out through the primary season...and I think Hillary will prevail. I expect Bernie Sanders, even though he is an Independent, will endorse her when that happens.


0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  0  
Sat 21 Nov, 2015 10:34 am
@Frank Apisa,
I am a disgrace to "womanhood." My first LOL of the day. Thank goodness the womenfolk have such a sterling arbiter of which women are appropriate to represent their sex.

Mansplain women a little more for us, Frank?

You're a joke.

What are people buying??
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/clinton-money/

She is selling off our country to the highest bidder. It is WIDELY known. You are helping her.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jun/10/hillary-clintons-favors-to-foundation-donors-stret/?page=all
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/05/hillary-clinton-foundation-state-arms-deals
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/06/05/clinton-foundation-hiding-names-of-secret-foreign-donors-to-its-shell-charity-in-sweden/
Frank Apisa
 
  3  
Sat 21 Nov, 2015 10:57 am
@Lash,
Lash wrote:

I am a disgrace to "womanhood." My first LOL of the day. Thank goodness the womenfolk have such a sterling arbiter of which women are appropriate to represent their sex.

Mansplain women a little more for us, Frank?

You're a joke.

What are people buying??
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/clinton-money/

She is selling off our country to the highest bidder. It is WIDELY known. You are helping her.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jun/10/hillary-clintons-favors-to-foundation-donors-stret/?page=all
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/05/hillary-clinton-foundation-state-arms-deals
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/06/05/clinton-foundation-hiding-names-of-secret-foreign-donors-to-its-shell-charity-in-sweden/



You are an out-of-control bitch, Lash. And I do think your ultimate objective is to sabotage the Democrats chances of winning the White House. If it is not your objective...it is what you are doing nonetheless.

Do your best. You've got lots of company.

I will continue to oppose people like you as forcefully as possible.

In any case, Hillary Clinton is not going to give up her candidacy...and my guess is she will win the nomination...and the election.
Lash
 
  -3  
Sat 21 Nov, 2015 11:33 am
@Frank Apisa,
You are an out of control bitch, Frank, who is corrupt, an establishment party plant, and a misogynist. Yawn.

Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Sat 21 Nov, 2015 12:34 pm
@Lash,
Lash wrote:

You are an out of control bitch, Frank, who is corrupt, an establishment party plant, and a misogynist. Yawn.




Nice try. Laughable...but a nice try.
Lash
 
  -1  
Sat 21 Nov, 2015 12:54 pm
@Frank Apisa,
A mirror image of you, Frank. Laughable. Get a clue.
0 Replies
 
RABEL222
 
  1  
Sat 21 Nov, 2015 04:12 pm
@Lash,
As a matter of fact if you have been paying attention you realize that I dont trust your opinion any farther than I can throw my 2 story house.
0 Replies
 
RABEL222
 
  2  
Sat 21 Nov, 2015 04:19 pm
@Lash,
So you dont mind that I dont refer to Bernie as saint Bernie but are ok with Shyt Hillary? Well one dosent need much of an explanation for your sudden conversion to democrat. I think its called hate. A common conservative affliction.
Lash
 
  -1  
Sat 21 Nov, 2015 04:37 pm
@RABEL222,
I became a Democrat because of hate?

Is it so much easier for you to believe that far-fetched, emotion-driven conspiracy theory - or that I respect an honest guy who I hope will be president?

I'm not a Democrat. I'm an Independent.

I've been socially liberal for most of my life.

I'm more socially liberal than you are right now.

Try to understand that I am like millions of other people in that I support Bernie Sanders and have no respect for HRC. There are many more like me. I understand that you know some Republicans may pretend to support Bernie, they hope he wins the primary because they believe the GOP nominee can more easily beat a "Democrat Socialist." I'm sure they exist.

I'm a dyed in the wool Bernie Sanders supporter.

It's that simple. There doesn't have to be any crazy conspiracy theory attached to it.
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Sat 21 Nov, 2015 05:10 pm
@revelette2,
Oh dear.
0 Replies
 
revelette2
 
  3  
Sun 22 Nov, 2015 08:14 am
I wish Rabel and Frank would just give it a rest already. I think she is sincere in her support of Bernie Sanders and somewhere along the way she changed her political views for real. On the other hand, I agree her hatred of Hillary Clinton seems more obsessive than her support for Bernie Sanders and she has in effect turned herself into a plant to defeat Hillary Clinton at all cost, not sure how far that will go but she has said she will not vote for Trump, beyond that, I am betting she will vote republican rather than Hillary.

I don't see Hillary any more corrupt than any other politician other than Sanders who is more ideology and ethically driven than getting elected. I do know Sanders has said he will support who ever wins the democrat ticket and that is the main difference in Sanders and Lash. I guess her Damascus Road experience didn't quite give her the same zealousness as it did Paul.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Sun 22 Nov, 2015 09:35 am
Is there any other country whose people begin their speculations about, and their arguments for and against candidates, so far ahead of any actual voting? Is any other country even close in obsessive-compulsive jockeying years before the voting?
djjd62
 
  1  
Sun 22 Nov, 2015 02:15 pm
@snood,
just north of you, we had our longest election period in our entire history, 76 days from the election being called to voting day, of course we already knew who the leaders were
snood
 
  2  
Sun 22 Nov, 2015 03:20 pm
@djjd62,
djjd62 wrote:

just north of you, we had our longest election period in our entire history, 76 days from the election being called to voting day, of course we already knew who the leaders were


Yes, I'd heard before that Canada was very sensible in the conduct of their elections.
I guess the years- long freak show version of presidential election is a uniquely American thing, like out of control gun violence.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Mon 23 Nov, 2015 02:30 am
@snood,
Our elections are usually about a month to six weeks long.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

The Pro Hillary Thread - Discussion by snood
get this woman out of my view/politics - Discussion by ossobuco
Hillary Clinton hospitalized - Discussion by jcboy
Has Hillary's Time Come? - Discussion by Phoenix32890
I WANT HILLARY TO RUN IN 2012 - Discussion by farmerman
Hillary's The Secretary Of State..It's Official - Discussion by Bi-Polar Bear
Hillary the "JOKESTER"?? - Discussion by woiyo
Hillary Rebuked by Iraqi Leader - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.13 seconds on 11/14/2024 at 10:04:08