2
   

Raise those flags!

 
 
roverroad
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Jun, 2004 07:52 pm
I get through life just fine thank you. Not as well as I did when Clinton was President though. I had a bigger bank account then. Not thanks to Bushman it's my boss that has the bigger bank account... I can't wait to vote this lying un-American warmonger out of white house. He thinks he's owed the white house. We need a president that realizes that he works for the people again.
0 Replies
 
GeneralTsao
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Jun, 2004 08:52 am
roverroad wrote:
I get through life just fine thank you. Not as well as I did when Clinton was President though. I had a bigger bank account then. Not thanks to Bushman it's my boss that has the bigger bank account... I can't wait to vote this lying un-American warmonger out of white house. He thinks he's owed the white house. We need a president that realizes that he works for the people again.


Unbelievable. Completely unbelievable that a person can be so misguided as to believe that his bank account size is directly attributable to any one person other than himself.

Have you forgotten that Clinton financed a faux economic recovery in 1993 by using bonds which came due in 2000? Remember the economy began tumbling in March, 2000? Remember the recession began in October, 2000?

Do you remember all the dotcom's in the 90s? Remember all the false hope and fictitiously-inflated stock values of the dotcom's?

How about the fraud discovered, during GW Bush's first two years, within Worldcom, Tyco, Adelphia, Tyson, and about a dozen other companies? All this fraud began during the Clinton years. Do you not see a link there, someplace?

Unbelievable!
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Jun, 2004 09:44 am
Bush is NOT A DICTATOR! There is simply no chance that Cheney would allow that.

As regards Worldcom, Tyco, Aldelphia, and though not included in the list above, Enron...perhaps we ought to search out connections between and relative donations to the two parties. There might even be a believable link there someplace.
0 Replies
 
kitchenpete
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Jun, 2004 10:09 am
GeneralTsao wrote:
roverroad wrote:
I get through life just fine thank you. Not as well as I did when Clinton was President though. I had a bigger bank account then. Not thanks to Bushman it's my boss that has the bigger bank account... I can't wait to vote this lying un-American warmonger out of white house. He thinks he's owed the white house. We need a president that realizes that he works for the people again.


Unbelievable. Completely unbelievable that a person can be so misguided as to believe that his bank account size is directly attributable to any one person other than himself.

Have you forgotten that Clinton financed a faux economic recovery in 1993 by using bonds which came due in 2000? Remember the economy began tumbling in March, 2000? Remember the recession began in October, 2000?

Do you remember all the dotcom's in the 90s? Remember all the false hope and fictitiously-inflated stock values of the dotcom's?

How about the fraud discovered, during GW Bush's first two years, within Worldcom, Tyco, Adelphia, Tyson, and about a dozen other companies? All this fraud began during the Clinton years. Do you not see a link there, someplace?

Unbelievable!


General - I hope YOU see the irony in criticizing the attribution of so much to a president and then making yoru own attributions to Clinton in the most undeserved manner.

Markets have their own logic, determined by many factors, one of which is political decision making. The dotcom boom/crash had little or nothing to do with Clinton, nor did the run of corporate frauds - the state of investment banking and the disregard for honesty was not a Democrat phenomenon any more than it was Republican.

I'm talking about something I know in detail. I'm a Forensic Accountant, specialising in fraud and money laundering prevention and detection.

Back the question...

Not my country or president but I know there was a big fuss about the Royal Ensign (the flag on Buckingham Palace, reprenting the Queen - not the Union Jack) NOT being flown at 1/2 mast after Princess Diana's death. The argument went that it never does, even after the death of a monarch, as it is symbolic of the continuity of the insitution of the head of state, not the person.

KP
0 Replies
 
Dartagnan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Jun, 2004 01:09 pm
McGentrix wrote:
It's just the liberal way of getting through life, mysteryman. They need to demonize and dehumanize anything logical or conservative. They can't be patriotic, they don't want others to be patriotic, and they can't be allowed to let themselves be happy.


This from someone who frequently depicts Hillary Clinton as the Whore of Babylon (and worse)? Demonizing, indeed. Come now, sir...
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Jun, 2004 11:17 pm
D'artagnan wrote:
This from someone who frequently depicts Hillary Clinton as the Whore of Babylon (and worse)? Demonizing, indeed. Come now, sir...


You mean she's not the Whore of Babylon?
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Jun, 2004 04:05 am
McG wrote:
It's just the liberal way of getting through life, mysteryman. They need to demonize and dehumanize anything logical or conservative. They can't be patriotic, they don't want others to be patriotic, and they can't be allowed to let themselves be happy.


You get more and more hateful all of the time, and there is less and clarity to your thought. Were you fair-minded, you would acknowledge that you are demonizing those who you castigate as liberal. Are you having a nervous reaction to the possibility that the Shrub might not be re-elected?

Edit: your statement seems to me to be very revealing, in that it has the character of projection . . .
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Jun, 2004 10:36 pm
D'artagnan wrote:


This from someone who frequently depicts Hillary Clinton as the Whore of Babylon (and worse)? Demonizing, indeed. Come now, sir...


What's worse than The Whore of Babylon? Willy has The Anti-Christ sewed up.
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Jun, 2004 11:20 am
Finn d'Abuzz wrote:
D'artagnan wrote:
This from someone who frequently depicts Hillary Clinton as the Whore of Babylon (and worse)? Demonizing, indeed. Come now, sir...

You mean she's not the Whore of Babylon?


Finn d'Abuzz wrote:
D'artagnan wrote:
This from someone who frequently depicts Hillary Clinton as the Whore of Babylon (and worse)? Demonizing, indeed. Come now, sir...

What's worse than The Whore of Babylon? Willy has The Anti-Christ sewed up.


Sorry, Finn, the second one wasn't any funnier than the first. Would you like to try coming up with a snappy retort one more time?
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Jun, 2004 12:47 pm
I give everyone permission to look up the skirt of the Whore of Babylon right here... http://www.remnantofgod.org/flash/whore/whore2.html

Warning: turn volume down before beginning or organ pipes will fall about your head.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Jun, 2004 01:02 pm
very intertaining and I learned alot too.
0 Replies
 
GeneralTsao
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Jun, 2004 01:06 pm
kitchenpete wrote:
GeneralTsao wrote:
roverroad wrote:
I get through life just fine thank you. Not as well as I did when Clinton was President though. I had a bigger bank account then. Not thanks to Bushman it's my boss that has the bigger bank account... I can't wait to vote this lying un-American warmonger out of white house. He thinks he's owed the white house. We need a president that realizes that he works for the people again.


Unbelievable. Completely unbelievable that a person can be so misguided as to believe that his bank account size is directly attributable to any one person other than himself.

Have you forgotten that Clinton financed a faux economic recovery in 1993 by using bonds which came due in 2000? Remember the economy began tumbling in March, 2000? Remember the recession began in October, 2000?

Do you remember all the dotcom's in the 90s? Remember all the false hope and fictitiously-inflated stock values of the dotcom's?

How about the fraud discovered, during GW Bush's first two years, within Worldcom, Tyco, Adelphia, Tyson, and about a dozen other companies? All this fraud began during the Clinton years. Do you not see a link there, someplace?

Unbelievable!


General - I hope YOU see the irony in criticizing the attribution of so much to a president and then making yoru own attributions to Clinton in the most undeserved manner.

Markets have their own logic, determined by many factors, one of which is political decision making. The dotcom boom/crash had little or nothing to do with Clinton, nor did the run of corporate frauds - the state of investment banking and the disregard for honesty was not a Democrat phenomenon any more than it was Republican.

I'm talking about something I know in detail. I'm a Forensic Accountant, specialising in fraud and money laundering prevention and detection.

KP


KP,
An excellent observation! The dotcom boom/crash was simple timing. Anyone could have been president and it is very likely the same exact things would have happened (just like the recent Space Plane launch happened without concern for who the President was at the time). Private enterprise tends to run on its own timetable, only hindered or not hindered by government regulations.

Regarding fraud (Enron, et al), yes, that too, does not particulary fall into Dem or Rep categories. But whether a government is permissive of such things can be an issue. This falls into the camp of Leadership.

I do not know if there are direct ties to Bill Clinton himself. I do know that a lot of the fraud had apparently begun in the 1990s. I doubt, but don't know if there were palms being greased so that government oversight agencies overlooked the bookkeeping discrepancies of these criminally-operated companies.

BTW, I do NOT believe that GW Bush is responsible for "catching" these crooks. I think their houses of cards collapsed on their own.

General Tsao
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Jun, 2004 04:16 pm
blatham wrote:
I give everyone permission to look up the skirt of the Whore of Babylon right here... http://www.remnantofgod.org/flash/whore/whore2.html

Warning: turn volume down before beginning or organ pipes will fall about your head.



That's a pretty sicko bunch that came up with that one Mr. Mountie. These some of your kin?
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Jun, 2004 04:17 pm
I'm inspired . . . i'm gonna go kill me some Papists . . .
0 Replies
 
Rick d Israeli
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Jun, 2004 04:33 pm
Bring it on Setanta! :wink:
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Jun, 2004 04:35 pm
Sit still, Rick, so's i can draw a bead on ya . . .
0 Replies
 
Rick d Israeli
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Jun, 2004 04:37 pm
Missed me.
0 Replies
 
Rick d Israeli
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Jun, 2004 04:40 pm
You did hid the girl next door though.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Jun, 2004 04:40 pm
She a Papist?
0 Replies
 
Rick d Israeli
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Jun, 2004 04:41 pm
Ehh....

1 - 0 for Setanta. Now I have to shoot some Protestant kid.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Raise those flags!
  3. » Page 4
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.17 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 06:52:36