@argome321,
I have made this analogy before (and I'm not even claiming it's a particularly good one), but.. Let's say you hate snakes, and I don't.
Should I hate snakes?
Suppose you give me innumerable reasons "why" you hate snakes. Let's say I understand your reasons.
But let's say I still don't hate snakes.
Again, the questions is "
should I hate snakes?" If so, why?
Let me repost an excerpt from the author of the study I cited earlier:
Quote:The word provokes emotions, emotions of pain and hurt for older generations, emotions that seem to be lacking among the consciousness of youth. ... when they do know [the history of the word] it’s still kind of like ‘That doesn’t have anything to do with me. That was then.’ They don’t really have an emotional connection to the word....A lot of them don’t know that it’s negative. And if they do know it’s negative, they don’t really care that it’s negative
"...if they do know it’s negative, they don’t really care that it’s negative."
I think your underlying assumption is that "if they knew the history, and the pain it's caused, THEN they would care. They just need to be educated, that's all."
But what if they still don't care because, they say: "That doesn’t have anything to do with me. That was then."
What now?